ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 10, 2026

cs.AI

Multimodal Abstention That Preserves Acquired Correct Answers

Jinyuan Zhang

Adding abstention to a task-adapted multimodal model can discard correct answers, including capabilities acquired during adaptation. We formulate abstention repair as maximizing correct abstention on unanswerable questions under a budget on newly lost correct answers. We propose ReFrain (Regression-Free Abstention), which combines a linear probe on first-token logits, threshold calibration on held-out image clusters, and a deterministic veto that replaces rejected outputs with the displayed "none of the above" option while preserving all other responses. "Regression-free" denotes zero loss on the calibration set at the zero-budget target. All abstention methods in our main comparison start from the same answering-SFT checkpoint; we separately track lost correct answers, repaired errors, and retained SFT gains. On Qwen2.5-VL-3B, ReFrain at zero budget retains all 57 SFT-gained answers with no losses and improves correct abstention by 7.30 percentage points. At a 0.5% calibration budget, it reaches 74.05% correct abstention with 8 losses and retains 55 gains; CLIP-UP EmbLoRA reaches 64.65% with 62 losses, 41 repairs, and 40 retained gains. The same probe at its default threshold loses 298 correct answers. With models and thresholds frozen, confirmation on 228 independent question clusters yields 66.05% correct abstention and no losses at the 0.5% point, exceeding EmbLoRA by 32.72 percentage points. Ordinary refusal SFT achieves higher correct abstention at greater regression cost. Code and reproduction materials: https://github.com/ModeLiberaL/ReFrain.

#02Nov 10, 2026

cs.CV

From Video Frames to Robot Meta-Frames: A Unified Latent Interface for World Action Models

Guoqiang Liang, Yiqi Lin, Yanzhe Chen and 2 more

Pretrained video diffusion models (VDMs) offer a powerful foundation for World Action Models (WAMs), which jointly predict robot actions and future observations. Building such models requires injecting low-dimensional robot signals (e.g. proprioception, actions, and values) into a latent space shaped by natural videos, and a key design choice is the interface through which these signals enter: existing schemes treat it as a formatting detail, spending a separate latent frame on each signal or bolting on dedicated encoders and decoders. We argue that signal injection is instead a distribution-alignment problem: how well a representation matches the prior of the pretrained VDMs during denoising. Using the relative reconstruction error of a frozen VDM denoiser as a probe, we find that conventional spatial encodings sit far off this prior, whereas frequency-domain packing yields latents that the denoiser corrects far less. Motivated by this diagnostic result, we propose MetaWAM, which folds all robot signals into a single unified meta-frame: each signal is assigned to a disjoint frequency-domain channel band and lifted to the spatial latent by an inverse DCT, yielding a decodable interface aligned with the pretrained VDM prior without any added module or architectural change. A fixed band layout together with slot-aware routing lets the same meta-frame support policy, world-model, and value prediction over a shared set of robot variables. On RoboCasa, MetaWAM reaches 68.9% success while collapsing the per-signal frames into one and cutting inference latency by 39%, and attains 85.0% success on three real-world Franka tasks. Code and models are available at https://github.com/showlab/MetaWAM

#03Nov 10, 2026

cs.CV

Location Matters: Sparse Latent-Variance Attacks for Face Privacy against Diffusion Personalization

Shuting Yang, Shuxin Li, Linyan Dai and 4 more

Text-to-image diffusion models can learn and reproduce an individual's identity from only a few reference photos, creating risks of unauthorized and misleading content generation. Proactive defenses address this risk by adding adversarial perturbations to facial images before release, thereby disrupting identity acquisition during downstream personalization. However, existing methods typically rely on dense $L_\infty$-bounded perturbations, whose accumulated distortions can become visible around facial structures. Recent methods improve protected-image quality, but often at the cost of reduced protection effectiveness. In this paper, we propose Sparse Encoder Attack on Latent Variance (SEAL), a sparse adversarial protection framework that modifies only 5% of the spatial locations in a facial image. SEAL combines a differentiable top-k masking scheme that jointly optimizes perturbation locations and values with a variance-oriented objective over the frozen VAE encoder's latent distribution to disrupt identity-consistent representations. A saliency-guided dispersion penalty further discourages perturbation concentration in perceptually salient facial regions. Experiments on CelebA-HQ and VGGFace2 show that SEAL achieves the best protected-image quality among the compared methods, exceeding 41 dB PSNR with 0.97 SSIM and at most 0.07 LPIPS, while reducing identity similarity to at most 0.15 after diffusion personalization. These results demonstrate that sparse location optimization enables strong identity protection while preserving high visual quality. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Lvxan/SEAL

#04Nov 10, 2026

cs.CV

Medical Image Segmentation: Foundation Model Adaptation versus Task-Specific Training

Emre Kutlusan, Yongmin Li

Foundation models pretrained on large natural-image collections are increasingly adapted for medical image segmentation, in the expectation that they will replace models trained for each task. Most comparisons, however, use data from the training distribution and a single task-specific baseline whose configuration is rarely justified, and therefore provide limited evidence of performance at new clinical sites. It also remains unclear how much of a foundation model must be adapted, and what determines this. We adapted a foundation model, DINOv2, with strategies ranging from tuning only its bias terms to full fine-tuning, and compared it with U-Nets and ResU-Nets trained from scratch. Experiments covered colonoscopy, breast ultrasound and dermoscopy, with testing on held-out data from the training source and on independent datasets from other institutions. The adapted foundation model generalised better on every external dataset. Within the training distribution, the task-specific models remained competitive when training data were abundant, and delineated boundaries more precisely, while the foundation model more often missed small lesions. Only a small fraction of the foundation model required adaptation, and the capacity needed was determined by the imaging domain rather than by the adaptation method. A widely used polyp test set was also found to duplicate images from another benchmark. Foundation-model adaptation is therefore warranted where models must work across sites, with capacity selected on the target domain.

#05Nov 10, 2026

cs.CV

What Factors Matter for Collection-Level Counting with Human-AI Collaboration?

Seoyun Jeong, Logan Lawrence, Owen L. Martin and 3 more

Many scientific and policy decisions require estimating the total number of target objects across a large image collection. Exhaustive human labeling is often infeasible, while raw model predictions can be biased, especially under domain shift. Recent human-AI estimation methods combine imperfect model predictions with limited human verification to obtain reliable collection-level estimates. However, existing work provides little guidance on how practitioners should choose among models, estimators, and adaptation strategies for a new deployment. We study these choices within a common human-in-the-loop counting framework across 12 tasks spanning biomedical microscopy, ground-level and aerial wildlife surveys, and overhead imagery of urban structures. Our results show that modern multimodal models provide a strong, training-free starting point for many tasks, while fine-tuned detectors become more advantageous at larger labeling budgets and across repeated deployments. Estimation efficiency improves further when model predictions are used to prioritize which units humans label, rather than sampling uniformly. We also find that each model's ranking quality can be estimated with a small pilot set, yielding practical guidance for selecting strategies on new counting tasks. In a field deployment on aerial pronghorn surveys, a task-specific adaptation of these methods meets the survey's $\pm 5\%$ tolerance after reviewing a median of only $3.2\%$ of collected images.