#01Nov 10, 2026
cs.CV
Toward Foundation Detection Models via Example-Based Grounding in EM-DETR
Sheethal Bhat, Bogdan Georgescu, Awais Mansoor and 3 more
DeepLearning (DL)-based Computer-Aided Diagnostic (CAD) systems have shown great promise in supporting clinicians, but their performance heavily depends on the availability of large, well-annotated datasets. In medical lesion detection, the scarcity of comprehensive, stan dardized annotations and the heterogeneity of existing datasets limit the development of robust foundation models. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to building a multi-domain foundation model for le sion detection by integrating diverse medical image datasets annotated for both anatomical structures and abnormalities. We first propose a student-teacher training strategy to effectively combine datasets with heterogeneous label spaces, mitigating catastrophic forgetting, and im proving feature learning. In addition, building on our previously pro posed example-based EM-DETR framework, we adapt it to jointly learn from multiple domain-specific datasets, enabling fine-grained, example driven detection across modalities. Our model achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results, with image-level AUC scores exceeding previous SOTA by 1% point on four key findings in CXRs. We achieve a leading mAP50 in CXRs and mammography, surpassing EM-DETR trained on a single dataset by 2-3% points. This approach paves the way for scalable foundation models in medical imaging that leverage heterogeneous data while maintaining robust and generalizable performance.
#02Nov 10, 2026
cs.CV
SpecValley: Aggregation as Spectral Valley in Dense Heterophilic Graphs
Christoph Jahn, Delvin Bacho, Urs Waldmann and 1 more
Node classification in heterophilic graphs remains an open problem: aggregating over neighbourhoods can damp precisely the part of the signal that carries the labels. The field has answered with ever more expressive propagation operators, leaving the aggregation step that precedes them fixed by degree normalisation. However, degree normalisation acts as a spectral valley in its own right, attenuating a fixed middle band whose position at lambda equal 1 is set by the normalisation rather than by the data, exactly where the eigenvalues of dense graphs accumulate. We therefore begin with the representations rather than the propagation, in two stages: a learnable aggregation followed by an ordinary spectral filter. The first, SpecValley learns the position, sharpness and flank gains of the valley for every graph. We show formally how the aggregation operator and downstream filter interact. We establish that the response 1 minus lambda of degree normalisation vanishes exactly at that accumulation point. A spectral energy budget shows that what aggregation removes from a band, no linear spectral filter can recover. Crowding alone says nothing about the benefit. That is decided by how much label energy the valley removes, which we measure for every graph. SpecValley achieves strong results across heterophilic benchmarks, and a controlled ablation over aggregation operators and downstream filters attributes the gain to aggregation rather than the filter.
#03Nov 10, 2026
cs.CV
AutoThreshold: Joint Confusion-Profile Learning for Adaptive Mask Binarization
Shaokai Wu, Xunchu Zhou, Pinzhi Wang and 5 more
A single validation-tuned threshold can become brittle when dense-score distributions shift. We introduce AutoThreshold, a post-hoc policy that predicts the joint mass of positive and negative pixels over score bins. This target directly parameterizes threshold-indexed confusion counts, avoiding products of independently estimated prevalence and class-conditional rates. Softmax normalization and cumulative decoding yield coherent, monotone confusion profiles; a plug-in decoder then selects a threshold for any $F_β$ objective without retraining the head. Across three independently trained Kvasir pipelines transferred to four polyp datasets, Joint exceeds continuous Otsu by $0.0080 \pm 0.0046$ external macro Dice, with positive gains in 3/3 runs. On the reference pipeline, three head seeds achieve $0.6324 \pm 0.0027$, 0.0085 above Otsu; direct-utility Ridge achieves 0.6342, with the paired difference interval spanning zero. The same Joint checkpoints outperform Otsu for $F_{0.5}$, Dice, and $F_2$. On developmental KITTI Road leave-one-corruption-family-out evaluation, Joint improves over scalar regression by 0.0082 [0.0064, 0.0101], while direct utility is 0.0022 higher. These results establish joint confusion prediction as a useful, metric-retargetable inductive bias, without claiming Bayes-optimal $F_β$ decisions.
#04Nov 10, 2026
cs.CV
UniFlow-RS: Unified Generative Prediction for Heterogeneous Remote-Sensing Tasks
Jianlong He, Liang Liao, Jing Xiao and 2 more
Remote-sensing foundation models increasingly unify representations across sensing modalities and downstream tasks, yet their prediction mechanisms remain largely task-specific. Separate decoders, prediction heads, and objectives leave prediction fragmented across tasks. This naturally raises a question: can heterogeneous remote-sensing tasks share the prediction process? UniFlow-RS answers this question with a single latent flow-matching predictor shared across tasks. This requires addressing two key challenges: unifying heterogeneous prediction spaces and harmonizing joint optimization across tasks. First, we cast heterogeneous task outputs into structured visual targets in a common latent space, allowing them to be modeled by the same pretrained flow predictor. Task-dependent conditioning further accommodates differences in input configurations. Second, we optimize all tasks with a common Flow Matching objective, eliminating task-specific prediction losses. To mitigate optimization mismatch across tasks and modalities, we introduce Task-Modality Adaptive Timestep Sampling (TMAS), which dynamically allocates training timesteps according to the online learning state of each task-modality group. Using a single shared model, UniFlow-RS handles six tasks and thirteen datasets, surpassing recent task-specific state-of-the-art methods on several benchmarks while remaining competitive on the others. Beyond these benchmarks, the same checkpoint demonstrates strong zero-shot transfer across unseen datasets, task settings, occlusion conditions, and near-infrared false-color imagery, without target-specific adaptation.
#05Nov 10, 2026
cs.CV
What Factors Matter for Collection-Level Counting with Human-AI Collaboration?
Seoyun Jeong, Logan Lawrence, Owen L. Martin and 3 more
Many scientific and policy decisions require estimating the total number of target objects across a large image collection. Exhaustive human labeling is often infeasible, while raw model predictions can be biased, especially under domain shift. Recent human-AI estimation methods combine imperfect model predictions with limited human verification to obtain reliable collection-level estimates. However, existing work provides little guidance on how practitioners should choose among models, estimators, and adaptation strategies for a new deployment. We study these choices within a common human-in-the-loop counting framework across 12 tasks spanning biomedical microscopy, ground-level and aerial wildlife surveys, and overhead imagery of urban structures. Our results show that modern multimodal models provide a strong, training-free starting point for many tasks, while fine-tuned detectors become more advantageous at larger labeling budgets and across repeated deployments. Estimation efficiency improves further when model predictions are used to prioritize which units humans label, rather than sampling uniformly. We also find that each model's ranking quality can be estimated with a small pilot set, yielding practical guidance for selecting strategies on new counting tasks. In a field deployment on aerial pronghorn surveys, a task-specific adaptation of these methods meets the survey's $\pm 5\%$ tolerance after reviewing a median of only $3.2\%$ of collected images.