#01Aug 6, 2026
cs.LG
RRC: Unlocking Generative Reward Models in LLM Reinforcement Learning via Ranking-Based Reward Construction
Chenglong Wang, Ziming Zhu, Yifu Huo and 9 more
Recent advances in reward modeling show a paradigm shift from discriminative reward models to generative reward models. However, despite their strong capabilities in response ranking, generative reward models have not realized their potential in reinforcement learning (RL). Our analysis reveals that this limitation arises from a mismatch between the comparative nature of generative reward modeling and the scalar scoring paradigm adopted by existing RL algorithms. To bridge this gap, we propose a Ranking-based Reward Construction (RRC) approach, which enables generative reward models to provide more effective RL learning signals by deriving rewards from relative preference rankings. RRC introduces two complementary strategies: self-competitive ranking, which exploits comparisons among sampled responses, and anchor-guided ranking, which enables scalable ranking-based reward construction with a small set of reference responses. Experiments across open-ended chat and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that RRC substantially improves RL training with generative reward models, achieving consistent gains over existing reward construction approaches. Our code can be found at https://github.com/wangclnlp/RRC.
#02Aug 6, 2026
cs.AI
Beyond Top-K: Replacing Black-Box Retrieval with Interpretable Agentic Operations
Sagar Tamang, Ayush Vyas, Tabarakul Hazarika
Retrieval-augmented generation over long documents is dominated by one design: chunk the text, embed the chunks, and surface the top-k nearest neighbours of the query. We argue that for an important class of documents -- financial statements, audit reports, regulatory returns -- this design is structurally unsound, and we make the argument measurable. On a 780-page government financial report, 86.8% of content lines are table rows, thousands of near-identical figures compete in one embedding space, and a figure inherits its unit from a header a median of 13 lines above it -- so a chunk boundary routinely separates a number from whether it is in lakh or crore, an error of two orders of magnitude. A table-aware chunker built as a steelman fixes the unit problem but leaves 27-30% of numeric chunks with no fiscal-year header at every chunk size we tried. We propose READ (Reliable Embedding-free Agentic Document-search), in which an agent reads the raw document through three deterministic operations -- normalized lexical search, structural navigation, and bounded span reads -- exposed over the Model Context Protocol, so a trajectory is a replayable audit trail, not an opaque similarity score. On 51 verified questions READ answers 58.8% against dense retrieval's 15.7% (p_Holm = 2 x 10^-5) -- or 35.3% tuned, which READ still leads by 23.5 points (p_Holm = 0.017). An agent given the same loop but a top-k tool reaches only 27.5%, locating the gain in the interface rather than in iteration. We also report what the evidence does not support: BM25 is statistically indistinguishable from READ, so our result separates embedding-based from embedding-free retrieval, not agentic from lexical search.
#03Aug 6, 2026
cs.CL
Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization
Xian Sun, Wei Chow, Yingshuo Wang and 4 more
Language models increasingly condition their answers on external signals, and a single misleading one can turn a correct answer wrong. The obvious remedy, training models to resist such signals, hides a failure mode: a model that ignores all context looks robust yet is useless when the context is worth trusting. We recast the problem as selective trust and introduce MIST, a human-annotated benchmark that renders each reasoning item under four matched conditions (clean, misleading, correct-context, and irrelevant-context), together with SC2W, a paired metric counting how often a misleading signal flips a clean-correct answer to wrong. Across a comprehensive benchmark study, we observe that such a susceptibility is universal. We then propose SCOPE, which mines clean-correct/misleading-wrong failures and optimizes a standard Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) objective over matched preference pairs balanced equally across all four conditions, rather than over misleading items alone. Our approach substantially reduces SC2W on popular open-sourced models while preserving accuracy when the added context is clean, correct, or irrelevant. With this work, we argue that models should be judged on selective trust, not on resistance alone.
#04Aug 6, 2026
cs.LG
BaKron: Efficient Quantization with Kronecker-Factored Hessians
Johann Birnick, Rayan Saab
We accelerate a family of algorithms for neural network quantization whose geometry is informed by any Kronecker-factored approximation of the Hessian. GPTQ-style adaptive rounding typically uses one-sided information derived from input activations. Two-sided Kronecker-factored Hessian approximations can additionally capture correlations across output coordinates, but applying GPTQ directly in the vectorized weight domain is computationally expensive. Building on the two-sided adaptive-rounding formulation used by BoA and YAQA, we introduce BaKron, an efficient solver that combines anti-diagonal parallelism with a recursive divide-and-conquer construction. For an $m\times n$ weight matrix, BaKron uses $O(m+n)$ sequential steps while reducing the total work from $O(m^2n^2)$ to $O(mn(m+n))$. Thus, it matches the cubic scaling of GPTQ while exploiting richer curvature information. Moreover, BaKron is modular with respect to both the base quantizer and the Hessian estimator. We also provide practical benchmarks, consider a range of Hessians that BaKron can be called with, find an efficient technique to compute these Hessians, and evaluate the algorithm experimentally.
#05Aug 6, 2026
cs.AI
Improving the Realism of Synthetic Clinical Benchmarks Under Utility Constraints
Omid Bazgir, Md Nasir, Jacob Hoffman and 6 more
Synthetic clinical benchmarks for enterprise AI agents can pass existing utility checks and still remain structurally unrealistic, especially in privacy-sensitive healthcare settings where operational data are hard to access. We study how to improve such benchmarks without breaking the downstream utility checks already used in practice. We formulate benchmark revision as utility-constrained realism improvement: dataset changes should increase realism while staying above an operational utility floor. We instantiate this idea on a care-gap benchmark derived from Synthea-generated patients exercised through demonstration electronic health record workflows and then processed by the same downstream pipeline as operational data. Realism is measured through missingness structure, simplicity, structural plausibility, and population alignment. The baseline benchmark is extremely thin: sampled-pair missingness is 79.44%, only 12.75% of rows are actionable, 38.94% of patients have zero actionable measures, and top-three token concentration reaches 100.0%. Two deterministic revisions improve these panels while remaining above the current utility floor, whereas a naive densification control preserves unrealistic templating. We further show that internal benchmark realism and source fidelity to an aggregate operational reference are related but distinct objectives. These results suggest that synthetic benchmark quality should be optimized explicitly, with utility treated as one constraint rather than as sufficient evidence of realism.