ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 10, 2026

cs.CV

TaoMate-R1: Temporal Role Specialization for Streaming Multi-Reference Video Generation

Qijun Gan, Chenwei Zhang, Xinyang Li and 2 more

Streaming multi-reference video generation establishes a scene from specified people and objects, then continues it under changing instructions. We introduce TaoMate-R1, a streaming multi-reference generator that organizes adaptation parameters through temporal role specialization. It assigns separate low-rank adapters to scene establishment and continuation on a frozen backbone. Each adapter performs both denoising and context writing for its role; Self Gradient Forcing jointly trains the roles through the history they construct. This allocation contrasts with operation-based specialization, which separates denoising from context writing across all chunks. A fixed-replay gradient analysis characterizes the update directions admitted by the two sharing schemes. On 32 multi-reference cases, we compare the schemes at the same two-adapter budget. Across ten approximately two-minute streams with changing instructions and shared teacher-audio conditioning, TaoMate-R1 reduces the mean boundary luminance jump from 1.96 to 0.613, with higher boundary feature similarity. It also achieves higher mean CLIP and DINO temporal similarity across short interactions, long streams, and public reference compositions. These results support grouping adaptation parameters by scene establishment and continuation for streaming multi-reference generation. Our code and model are released at https://github.com/TaoLiveAIGC/TaoMate-H3.

#02Nov 10, 2026

cs.CR

GARD: Gradient-Guided Adversarial Representation Defense against Backdoors in Multimodal Contrastive Learning Models

Yuhong Wang, Yujun Cai, Lei Feng and 1 more

Multimodal contrastive learning models such as CLIP are vulnerable to backdoor attacks with diverse trigger structures, ranging from localized patches to globally distributed perturbations, with recent attacks increasingly optimizing these triggers in the representation space. Existing post-hoc defenses based on clean fine-tuning may leave backdoors active, while trigger-inversion methods depend on accurately estimating the attack target and trigger. We observe that backdoored encoders exhibit structure-dependent representation sensitivity: global perturbations preferentially expose distributed backdoors, whereas local patch perturbations are more effective for localized backdoors. Based on this observation, we propose Gradient-Guided Adversarial Representation Defense (GARD), a target- and trigger-agnostic post-hoc defense. GARD optimizes complementary global and local adversarial probes to maximally displace clean-image representations, and then realigns the perturbed representations with detached clean anchors while preserving image-text alignment. The resulting model requires no additional computation at inference time. Across six visual backdoor attacks and two CLIP visual backbones, GARD reduces the attack success rate below 1% in all 12 evaluated attack-backbone combinations while maintaining competitive clean accuracy. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of adversarial representation probing for repairing backdoored multimodal contrastive encoders.

#03Nov 10, 2026

cs.RO

ForeseeDrive: Future-Token Conditioning for Anticipatory Generative Driving

Shaokai Wu, Xunchu Zhou, Pinzhi Wang and 8 more

Generative driving planners can represent diverse ego futures, but a downstream scorer can choose only among sampled candidates; it cannot recover an absent maneuver. We present ForeseeDrive, which turns future scene evolution into a deployable interface for shaping candidate generation. Rather than reconstructing dense future states or scoring a fixed menu, ForeseeDrive derives query-indexed tokens from logged actor motion, occupancy evolution, route interactions, and TTC margins, and predicts the same token space from present context at deployment. The tokens condition trajectory geometry before candidates materialize. A zero-token-gated residual path and candidate-preservation loss limit unnecessary drift, while a TTC-margin guard targets brittle safe-to-unsafe boundary crossings. Under their respective benchmark protocols, ForeseeDrive reaches 89.2 PDMS on NAVSIM navtest, 0.41\,m average L2 and 0.05\% collision rate on nuScenes validation, and a 76.50 driving score on Bench2Drive. Controlled DiffusionDrive/NAVSIM diagnostics show an exact zero-token no-op, a small aligned-over-shuffled selected-PDM advantage under preservation, mixed oracle-best quality, and localized TTC-boundary failures. Together, the benchmark results and bounded mechanism tests support future-conditioned generation as a practical interface for anticipation. Code is included in the supplementary materials.

#04Nov 10, 2026

cs.CV

UniFlow-RS: Unified Generative Prediction for Heterogeneous Remote-Sensing Tasks

Jianlong He, Liang Liao, Jing Xiao and 2 more

Remote-sensing foundation models increasingly unify representations across sensing modalities and downstream tasks, yet their prediction mechanisms remain largely task-specific. Separate decoders, prediction heads, and objectives leave prediction fragmented across tasks. This naturally raises a question: can heterogeneous remote-sensing tasks share the prediction process? UniFlow-RS answers this question with a single latent flow-matching predictor shared across tasks. This requires addressing two key challenges: unifying heterogeneous prediction spaces and harmonizing joint optimization across tasks. First, we cast heterogeneous task outputs into structured visual targets in a common latent space, allowing them to be modeled by the same pretrained flow predictor. Task-dependent conditioning further accommodates differences in input configurations. Second, we optimize all tasks with a common Flow Matching objective, eliminating task-specific prediction losses. To mitigate optimization mismatch across tasks and modalities, we introduce Task-Modality Adaptive Timestep Sampling (TMAS), which dynamically allocates training timesteps according to the online learning state of each task-modality group. Using a single shared model, UniFlow-RS handles six tasks and thirteen datasets, surpassing recent task-specific state-of-the-art methods on several benchmarks while remaining competitive on the others. Beyond these benchmarks, the same checkpoint demonstrates strong zero-shot transfer across unseen datasets, task settings, occlusion conditions, and near-infrared false-color imagery, without target-specific adaptation.

#05Nov 10, 2026

cs.RO

One Policy for 100 Household Tasks: Our Solution for the 2026 BEHAVIOR Challenge

Ilia Larchenko, Gleb Zarin, Atindra Nair and 4 more

We describe our solution for the 2026 BEHAVIOR Challenge: 100 long-horizon household tasks in the OmniGibson simulator. We placed 9th on the final leaderboard, the only independent team in the top 10. The core of the solution is a single vision-language-action (VLA) model, one checkpoint for all 100 tasks, built on our 1st-place 2025 solution, which is based on $π_{0.5}$. On the 50 tasks shared with 2025, its Q rises from 0.260 to 0.371; across all 100 tasks it scores 0.392. Our main conclusion from 2025 was that the model was undertrained, so most of the 2026 work went into training the model for longer, optimizing some training parameters, making each training step slightly faster and reducing the gradient noise: a migration from 50 to 100 tasks (semantic stages built from the demonstrations' skill annotations, task and stage embeddings of new tasks warm-started from similar old ones, and a 21-dimensional action space matching the teleoperation controls); variance-reduced multi-sample flow matching with a simple noise-vs-compute model that picks the number of action-expert samples per observation without ablations; and a 200k-step training run, about one pass over the 211M frames of the demonstrations. A cloud evaluation infrastructure keeps a shared record with provenance, episode diagnostics and restorable simulator states, and runs six simulators on one GPU together faster than real time. On top of the learned policy, 14 tasks are routed to a GPT-6 Astra coding agent that controls the robot through observation and motion tools, starting every episode from a frozen copy of its own practice session on training instances. Across these 14 tasks, Astra's mean Q is 0.639, against 0.108 for the learned policy. The public submission included only part of the Astra results and scored 0.446 Q with 27.3% full-task success.