#01Sep 1, 2026
cs.LG
CATeye: Coupled Attribute-Topology Invariance Learning for Voucher Abuse Detection
Tian Tian, Shuaicheng Niu, Hao Kuang and 3 more
Voucher abuse poses a major challenge in e-commerce, where malicious users exploit promotional vouchers for profit. Unfortunately, fraud patterns evolve rapidly over time and across regions, causing distribution shifts that degrade existing detection models unless retrained frequently. To tackle this, we propose the Coupled Attribute-Topology Invariance Learning framework (CATeye). The key challenge arises from coupled attribute-topology shift, where edges built from attribute proximity cause environment-driven attribute shift to induce shifted topology, thereby amplifying variant signals through GNN message passing. CATeye sees through such coupled shifts with two learnable selectors. First, an Attribute Invariance Selector (AIS) learns node-adaptive masks to filter out non-invariant attributes. Then, conditioned on retained invariant attributes, an Edge Invariance Selector (EIS) samples an invariant subgraph and isolates non-invariant edges. Using the resulting invariant and non-invariant components, CATeye constructs multiple views and applies view-specific objectives to emphasize domain-invariant representations while suppressing domain-specific variations. Experiments on both a proprietary dataset from Lazada, a major Southeast Asian e-commerce platform, and a public benchmark show that CATeye consistently outperforms nine strong domain generalization and graph anomaly detection baselines, achieving up to an 8.61% improvement in average F1 score over the strongest baseline. Source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Tian0426/CATeye.
#02Sep 1, 2026
stat.ML
On the Reliability of Generative Augmentation: A Wasserstein-Based Theoretical and Empirical Study
Chathurika S Abeykoon, Mathias Nthiani Muia, Mallory Goldstein
Generative data augmentation is widely used to mitigate class imbalance, yet its theoretical effect on downstream generalization remains poorly understood. In this work, we develop a statistical framework for conditional generative augmentation and analyze its impact on classification risk. We formalize augmentation as a distribution-mixing process and show that the resulting risk distortion is controlled by both the augmentation strength and the class-conditional Wasserstein discrepancy between real and generated distributions. We further derive a capacity-dependent generalization bound based on Rademacher complexity, revealing an explicit trade-off between hypothesis complexity, augmentation intensity, and generative fidelity. Empirically, we evaluate the framework on binary and multiclass imbalanced classification tasks using Conditional GAN and Conditional WGAN-GP augmentation. Across datasets, CWGAN-GP consistently achieves lower Wasserstein discrepancies than CGAN, indicating improved distributional fidelity. However, improved fidelity does not necessarily translate into superior classification performance, with classical oversampling methods often remaining competitive. These findings support the central theoretical prediction that augmentation reliability is governed by distributional approximation error rather than predictive performance alone. Overall, this work establishes generative augmentation as a distributional perturbation process whose reliability can be quantified through Wasserstein-based measures and supported by finite-sample generalization guarantees. The proposed framework provides a principled foundation for evaluating synthetic data quality beyond classification accuracy alone.
#03Sep 1, 2026
cs.AI
Can LLMs Discover Scientific Laws in Real and Parallel Worlds?
Yiming Huang, Ziche Liu, Zhuohang Wu and 11 more
Scientific equation discovery has long been central to scientific progress, proceeding through iterative cycles of hypothesis generation, observational testing, and refinement under scientific constraints. As LLM capabilities advance and their role in AI for Science expands, it remains an open problem whether they can genuinely discover scientific laws and how this ability should be evaluated. Existing evaluations, however, often either simplify discovery through synthetic settings or reuse published targets that may already be familiar to LLMs. We therefore introduce SCILAWS-BENCH, a benchmark for scientific law discovery built from published research and real scientific data. It comprises 118 problems drawn from 381 scientific papers, covering 291 candidate laws and roughly 8M real data points across six scientific disciplines. Each problem is instantiated in two complementary settings: (1) SCILAWS-REAL asks models to propose laws from fixed real observations and evaluates held-out predictive fit and scientific validity derived from the source literature, and (2) SCILAWS-PARALLEL asks models to actively query residual-calibrated worlds and recover synthesized hidden laws derived from published forms. This two-setting task design preserves each problem's scientific context while separately evaluating fixed-record law discovery and active recovery of a newly synthesized hidden law. We find that predictive fit can diverge from scientific validity, memorization shapes whether models reproduce or move beyond published formulas, and our best-of-N study reveals a selection bottleneck. Our work provides a paper-grounded benchmark and new empirical perspectives for evaluating AI for scientific discovery. Project page: https://yiyihum.github.io/SciLaws-Bench
#04Sep 1, 2026
cs.CL
Scaling Near-Optimal SFT-RL Annotation Budget Allocation from Small to Large LLMs
Jingtan Wang, Arun Verma, Xiaoqiang Lin and 4 more
How to divide a fixed annotation budget between supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) during LLM post-training remains an open problem. Existing work characterizes only broad trends (e.g., SFT dominates in low-data regimes), lacks a principled allocation framework, and does not examine whether the optimal ratio transfers across model sizes. We frame this problem in terms of near-optimality: rather than seeking a single optimal SFT-RL ratio, we characterize the near-optimal region, the set of allocations within a specified tolerance of peak performance. Empirically, this region is wide even for small tolerances (2-10%), widens with model scale, and transfers reliably from small proxy models to large target models. This yields a practical strategy: small proxy-model experiments suffice to identify a transferable near-optimal region, eliminating the need for exhaustive large-scale search. Our results hold consistently across tasks, model families, and both preference-based off-policy and reward-supervision on-policy RL methods. We further analyze how the asymmetry in annotation costs between SFT and RL data shifts the near-optimal region.
#05Sep 1, 2026
cs.LG
Gradient-Update Mismatch: Rethinking Conflict-Free Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Jing Xiao, Xinhai Chen, Qinglin Wang and 5 more
Training Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) requires jointly optimizing physics residual and initial/boundary condition loss terms, which often induce conflicting gradients. Gradient surgery methods mitigate this issue by constructing directions from loss-specific gradients to reduce conflict before optimizer transformation. However, even when the constructed direction is conflict-free, this property may not be preserved after optimizer transformation. Let $a_t$ denote the direction constructed by gradient surgery, $u_t$ the optimizer proposal, and $\mathcal{C}_t$ the conflict-free cone induced by the loss-specific gradients. We show that modern optimizers can transform $a_t$ through mechanisms such as historical state, adaptive scaling, preconditioning, or decoupled weight decay, so $a_t \in \mathcal{C}_t$ does not generally imply $u_t \in \mathcal{C}_t$. We refer to this optimizer-induced discrepancy in conflict-freeness between $a_t$ and $u_t$ as Gradient-Update Mismatch (GUM). Accordingly, we propose Gradient-Update Alignment (GUA), which projects $u_t$ onto $\mathcal{C}_t$ to obtain the aligned update $p_t$ and applies $p_t$ to the parameters. When the optimizer maintains internal state, GUA further adjusts this state toward targets reconstructed from the applied update. We conduct extensive experiments and find that GUM is widespread across momentum, adaptive, and curvature-based optimizers, with conflict rates reaching up to 86.3%. Across all PINN settings, GUA achieves conflict-free applied updates and consistently improves various gradient surgery methods, reducing the relative $L_2$ error by up to 98.2% in individual settings. Data and code are available at https://github.com/JingXiao10/GUA.