#01Oct 15, 2026
cs.AI
MLExpert: Towards a Generalist Agentic Model for Autonomous Machine Learning Engineering
Shangheng Du, Jinxin Shi, Shuaiyu Zhang and 7 more
Large language models (LLMs) are expanding from assisting scientific research and engineering to autonomously developing and improving AI systems, advancing AI for AI (AI4AI) as a pathway toward recursive self-improvement (RSI). Workflow-driven machine learning engineering (MLE) systems provide a practical path toward this pursuit through complex orchestration that manages long-horizon experimentation, while recent MLE systems adopt model-directed interaction, allowing models to autonomously organize experiments and adapt optimization strategies based on execution feedback. However, feedback from each experiment reflects several preceding decisions, and a long MLE run contains many such costly experiments. Training must therefore select useful supervision from long interaction trajectories and learn from intermediate outcomes. We propose a post-training method for autonomous long-horizon MLE optimization and apply it to train MLExpert, a 35B Mixture-of-Experts agentic model. We design the Kaggle-MLE Factory to construct executable tasks and an interaction harness for model-directed experimentation. Hierarchical agentic SFT transfers general tool-use and coding capabilities to MLE through outcome-guided supervision. Windowed Interaction RL (WIRL) treats the multi-turn decisions between successive experiment results as an execution window and assigns it a shared outcome-based reward. Asynchronous collection and policy correction support policy updates before the trajectory ends. On MLE-Bench Lite, MLExpert improves the average medal rate of the base model from 37.9% to 72.7%, achieving performance comparable to larger frontier models such as Kimi-K3 and GLM-5.3. Further experiments show that MLExpert improves performance on NatureBench Lite, agent scaffold optimization, and algorithm optimization, suggesting that the learned optimization capability generalizes to other tasks.
#02Oct 15, 2026
cs.LG
Baselines and Score Centering in Policy Gradient Estimation
Shuo Han, Ziqing Hu
Reinforcement learning has become a widely used approach to post-training large language models. In a typical implementation, learning is off-policy: The policy generating the responses differs from the policy being trained because of training-inference mismatch or policy staleness in asynchronous training. This discrepancy is commonly addressed by importance sampling, whose ratio is usually regularized in practice through truncation, masking, or clipping. Under regularized importance sampling, the importance-weighted policy gradient is no longer invariant to constant shifts in the reward. This invariance is recovered by using the covariance between the reward and the importance-weighted score as the estimand, which coincides with the policy gradient when the ratio is not regularized. This note develops this covariance perspective for both sequence-level and token-level importance sampling. The covariance perspective reveals the roles of the group-mean baseline and score centering in policy gradient estimation. Both perform centering in covariance estimation, but they differ in the mean being subtracted: The group-mean baseline uses a sample mean, whereas score centering uses a population mean. The two lead to distinct unbiased covariance estimators with different variances. Whether both forms of centering should be used simultaneously depends on whether importance sampling is applied at the sequence level or at the token level. With sequence-level importance sampling, score centering adds no benefit once the group-mean baseline is used; with token-level importance sampling, using the group-mean baseline without score centering generally introduces bias when the importance ratio is regularized.
#03Oct 15, 2026
cs.LG
Explore Once, Evaluate Many: Multiple Policy Evaluation for Stochastic Linear Bandits
Spyros Dragazis, Yilei Chen, Aldo Pacchiano
We study how to evaluate $K$ target policies simultaneously in stochastic contextual bandits with linear reward structure. Given a known $d$-dimensional feature map and reward-free access to policy queries, we propose PRISMA (Policy evaluation through Regularized Information Sharing and Mixture Allocation), an algorithm that estimates every target policy's value to accuracy $\varepsilon$ with probability at least $1-δ$. The algorithm uses $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\!\left( \frac{(L^2S^2+β^2)(1\veeρ^\star)}{\varepsilon^2} \cdot \log(K) \right)$ context draws and reward observations, where $ρ^\star\le d$ is an instance-dependent measure of the difficulty of designing a shared sampling distribution. Here, $L$, $S$, and $β$ bound the feature norm, reward parameter norm, and reward noise, respectively, and the suppressed factors are logarithmic in $K$, $d$, and $1/δ$. Our method combines reward-free planning, a regularized sampling design, and a single ridge regression estimator shared across all target policies. An adaptive doubling procedure selects the regularization scale without knowledge of $ρ^\star$. The guarantees require no numerical lower bound on second-moment eigenvalues and have no explicit dependence on the cardinalities of the context and action spaces. Policy-query costs are accounted for separately, with $K$ queries per shared planning context.
#04Oct 15, 2026
cs.LG
Query-Efficient Rejection Sampling for Parallel Masked Diffusion
Shiyuan Zhang, Xuheng Li, Qiwei Di and 1 more
Masked diffusion models (MDMs) accelerate generation by unmasking multiple tokens in parallel, but sampling these tokens independently ignores their correlations and biases the output. Anari et al. (2026) corrected this bias with rejection sampling, decomposing the log acceptance probability into a sum of token-level terms, but the evaluation requires one score query per unmasked token. We propose the Single-Increment Rejection Sampler (SIRS), which provides an estimate of the log acceptance probability from a single randomly sampled increment at the cost of one query. SIRS then converts a Poisson number of clipped estimates into accept/reject decisions through a Bernoulli factory adapted from Chen et al. (2026). Since each query returns the conditionals of all remaining tokens in the block, we further Rao-Blackwellize each increment by averaging over these tokens at no extra cost, thereby reducing clipping. We show that the KL-divergence between the data distribution and the SIRS output is bounded by a clipping term plus the model's training error. With exact scores, parallel decoding pays the full within-block dependence, whereas SIRS pays only the part beyond the clipping range.
#05Oct 15, 2026
cs.LG
Lean Graph Search for Formal Theorem Proving
Yihan Xu, Jia-Chen Gu, Junyi Zhang and 7 more
Retrieving relevant lemmas is crucial for formal theorem proving, enabling provers to build machine-checkable proofs from established mathematical results. Recent retrieval systems match library declarations to a target theorem or its intermediate proof steps, but make limited use of multi-hop dependencies among declarations. These dependencies can reveal supporting lemmas that are not necessarily lexically similar to the target theorem but recur in proofs of related problems. To this end, we propose LeanGraphSearch, a graph-based retrieval method for Lean 4 that constructs a graph from Mathlib's forward dependencies and traverses it to uncover supporting lemmas through multi-hop dependency chains. Specifically, LeanGraphSearch links each declaration to the premises it depends on, uses a graph-based ranking algorithm to propagate relevance from semantically matched declarations to their dependencies, and reranks the expanded candidates against the original query. Across two mathematical retrieval benchmarks, LeanGraphSearch improves recall by up to 12% over the strongest baseline, LeanSearch v2, on MathlibQR and increases coverage of complete annotated proof routes on MathlibMPR, covering up to 3.7% of extra groups. More importantly, we evaluate whether these retrieval gains translate into improved end-to-end theorem proving by integrating LeanGraphSearch into an iterative proving loop guided by Lean feedback. Across three theorem proving benchmarks, LeanGraphSearch improves pass rate at {8, 16, 32} reflection turns by as much as 40% compared to vanilla prover and at most 10% compared to LeanSearch v2, showing higher accuracy-cost efficiency. These findings highlight the value of dependency graph search for theorem proving and motivate further research on structure-aware search for proof discovery.