#01Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
Objects as Addresses: Instance Binding in Vision Transformer Attention
Khalil Sabri, Guillaume-Alexandre Bilodeau, Nicolas Saunier and 1 more
Humans naturally parse visual scenes into coherent individual objects rather than scattered features, a capability cognitive science calls object binding. While recent work shows that pretrained Vision Transformers (ViTs) intrinsically acquire this ability, how native self-attention computations mechanistically keep object instances separate remains unresolved. By studying this across eight pretrained ViTs, we found that instance separation is expressed more strongly in attention routing than in token content: selected query-key relations distinguish individual objects more reliably than value similarity or residual representations. Inside heads, patches belonging to one individual tend to read from a common image region, which we term their attention address. Visually distinct parts of one person share an address, whereas identical duplicated instances receive separate, movable addresses. These shared destinations arise in part because query interactions with the spatial structure of keys direct attention toward consistent regions for one object and elsewhere for another. In DINOv2 and most other backbones we tested, editing this query component at the selected head redirects its attention address toward another individual. Grouping patches by this query component separates same-category instances, reaching .615 FG-ARI versus .289 for the same clustering of final-layer features, which tend to merge them.
#02Nov 12, 2026
cs.RO
ProtoVis-Nav: Prototypical Visual Imagination for Visual-Spatial Aligned UAV Navigation
Guangyuan Sui, Yunzhong Hou, Chi Harold Liu
Vision language navigation (VLN) is very challenging for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) since small errors in 3D motion prediction can lead to navigation errors and collisions. Unable to fathom execution outcomes in 3D environments, existing methods often struggle to predict accurate navigation waypoints from language instructions. To solve this, we introduce the Prototypical Visual Imagination framework, shortened as ProtoVis-Nav, which forces the model to imagine an outcome-associated local visual representation for the intended next UAV movement. Specifically, we predict feature prototypes and use their linear combination to estimate the visual feature of the target region. In this manner, the VLN model first imagines the local visual representation of the next intended location, and then uses predicted prototypes as context for generating the final action, promoting alignment between visual context and waypoint outputs. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the ProtoVis-Nav framework and show substantial improvements over existing baselines.
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.CL
ArchSpace: Recording, Reviewing, and Referencing LLM Architecture Research
Jie Wang, Tong Zhu, JiaHao Kuang and 8 more
Model architecture shapes the scaling behavior, training efficiency, and inference cost of LLMs, making it a central focus of both industry and academia. In industry, teams such as those behind DeepSeek, Qwen, and Kimi routinely introduce architectural innovations, yet public reports rarely document which ideas succeeded, which were abandoned, and why. In academia, limited compute and inconsistent baselines often restrict evaluations to small-scale, single-point comparisons, making it difficult to establish whether improvements hold at larger scales or translate into broader impact. ArchSpace addresses both gaps as a public platform for Recording, Reviewing, and Referencing Architecture Researc}: each proposal is recorded with its experiments and reasoning, reviewed by the community, and referenced by later work. To evaluate ideas before costly large-scale training, ArchSpace leverages scaling laws to predict model loss at larger scales from smaller experiments, a practice widely adopted in industry. We provide initial references that make the platform usable: Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe. Ideas validated through this review can in turn become new baselines, and ArchSpace thereby aims to broaden the range of ideas that shape the next generation of models.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.LG
Two mathematical models of knowledge distillation
Audrey Xie, Ludwig Schmidt, John Duchi
Many hypotheses compete to explain the successes of knowledge distillation. To help address this, we propose and analyze a mathematical model of distillation, which suggests that distillation's performance comes not from obtaining better models but from easier to optimize landscapes. For generalized linear models trained with stochastic gradient descent, we prove that distillation fits performant student models asymptotically more quickly than non-distilled models. In rank-1 matrix approximation, we characterize conditions on the target matrix under which gradient descent with distillation converges strictly faster than training on the supervised objective. The theory helps delineate the ways distillation provides benefits (i.e., in optimization speed, not in generalization), and experiments on real datasets corroborate the theoretical predictions.
#05Nov 12, 2026
cs.CL
Learning When Diffusion Language Models Should Regenerate
Minhae Oh, Jeonghye Kim, Jinwoo Koo and 4 more
Remasking allows diffusion language models to revisit generated text, but effective correction requires knowing when and what to revise. Our diagnosis on Sudoku reveals two gaps. Hidden states contain error information that token confidence does not reliably expose, and remasking an isolated error usually reproduces it when the surrounding context remains fixed. These findings motivate DiVR , a verifier that predicts whether a partially generated sequence will reach a correct answer. Trained on the final correctness of the model's own trajectories, DiVR decides when to regenerate a block and which alternative to retain, while the generator itself stays unchanged. On five reasoning benchmarks with LLaDA-8B-Base, DiVR raises the average accuracy of the fine-tuned generator from 35.3\% to 43.4\% at $1.9$-$3.5\times$ the cost of greedy decoding, above search baselines that use $3.8$-$7.4\times$. It also complements post-training such as supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, and generalizes to other generators, including Dream.