#01Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
Where and Why is Grounded Reasoning Useful?
David Yan, Le Xue, Forrest Huang and 4 more
Grounded reasoning, where a model outputs text coordinates of relevant locations in chain-of-thought reasoning, is a common strategy for solving complex visual reasoning problems. However, the benefits and limitations of grounded reasoning are understudied. We study where and why grounded reasoning is most useful. To do so, we introduce a chain-of-thought analysis method to measure how much a model uses its outputted grounding in its thinking trace and perform a detailed ablation study of a grounded reasoning training recipe. We find that grounded reasoning improves counting but shows no significant gain over baselines without coordinate grounding across a wide range of spatial reasoning and perception benchmarks. Using several synthetic tasks, we show that grounded reasoning is most useful when a task requires undescribable references, which are visual concepts that are difficult to describe in language. However, we observe that many existing visual reasoning benchmarks are solvable with only describable text references. To close this gap, we introduce BrickVision, a new benchmark that requires undescribable visual references to solve.
#02Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
Improving Context-Shift Robustness of Convolutional Networks via Context-Regularized Cross-Entropy
Jinen Setpal, Chaoyue Liu
Image classification models often encounter objects in diverse and unpredictable contexts at test time, which may differ substantially from those seen during training. This phenomenon, termed context shift, exposes a key fragility in neural networks: when models rely on non-causal contextual cues for prediction, shifts in context can lead to significant performance degradation. In this paper, we propose a novel training framework to improve the robustness of convolutional neural networks under context shift. Our approach leverages spatial feature attribution to guide models toward making predictions that rely less on contextual regions and more on object-relevant features. As a first step, recognizing a theoretical limitation of existing feature attribution methods we introduce a new variant, ContrastiveCAMs, which produces more faithful attribution maps of model predictions. Building on ContrastiveCAMs, we further propose Context-Regularized Cross-Entropy (CR-CE), a modification of the standard cross-entropy loss that regularizes the model's attention by suppressing the influence of contextual regions, thereby improving robustness to context shift. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on several medium-to-large scale datasets (Waterbirds, Spawrious, ImageNet/ImageNet-BG, Hard-ImageNet), and report consistent improvements in context-shift robustness.
#03Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
SplatAnything: Gaussian Spacing Normalization for Feed-forward 3DGS across Arbitrary Scenes
Hao Yu, Zhenwei Wang, Yongzhen Hu and 7 more
We identify a key limitation of existing feed-forward 3DGS methods: Gaussian attributes are typically predicted in a radial-distance-normalized space that canonicalizes a global radial statistic of the reconstructed geometry, while the spacing between neighboring Gaussian centers can still vary substantially across scene scales and camera configurations. This mismatch induces systematic shifts in Gaussian-scale targets, leading to ambiguous supervision. To address this, we propose SplatAnything with Gaussian Spacing Normalization (GSNorm), which canonicalizes a robust scene-level statistic of Gaussian spacing to provide a more consistent spatial reference for Gaussian prediction. To rigorously assess our method, we further establish a systematic benchmark spanning diverse datasets, input sparsity levels, and challenging extrapolated viewpoints. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SplatAnything achieves state-of-the-art performance, with particularly strong gains under substantial variations in scene scale and viewpoint.
#04Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
4D Point Splatting for mmWave Radar Micro-Doppler Differentiable Rendering
Adnan Armouti, Guanyue Qian, Rajalakshmi Nandakumar
Millimeter-wave radar resolves the micrometer displacements of a moving body as micro-Doppler, enabling gait, gesture, activity, pose and vital-sign sensing. Each task relies on a downstream model trained on real data, yet radar datasets lag orders of magnitude behind vision and language. Brute-force collection will not close that gap, and existing synthesis methods (forward-only simulators, learned generators and static-scene inverse renderers) cannot fit a real capture of a moving body, leaving a sim2real gap. We present 4D Point Splatting (4DPS), a physics-based differentiable renderer that fits an explicit moving scene to a real capture. Using the synchronized camera to initialize the room and body, we represent the scene as oriented points carrying material, normal and velocity, and splat each point into range and Doppler bins. Our output is the raw complex return a real radar records, so we apply the same signal processing on the rendered data to obtain any representation for training any SOTA downstream model. We fit 235 sequences on HuPR and 100 on RT-Pose, two datasets with different radars. Our reconstructions set the state of the art, with median correlations of 0.940 and 0.830 on range-azimuth, 0.829 and 0.695 on range-Doppler, and 0.988 and 0.966 on micro-Doppler. Our renders also set the state of the art in downstream sim2real gap. On RT-Pose, a pose model trained on them reaches 21.9 cm MPJPE on real data, against 16.7 cm for real training and 127.6 cm for the RF-Genesis baseline, where both the rendered- and real-trained models learn nearly the same features. Our custom CUDA kernels fit a sequence in 5.7 minutes on HuPR and 12.9 on RT-Pose on one H100, making dataset-scale inverse rendering of mmWave radar possible for the first time. This work can enable synthetic data generation for any human-centered downstream task and model, and scene editing for data augmentation.
#05Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
Do You Miss the Nights We Spent Crafting Figures? Rethinking Teaser and Framework Figures in the Age of Generative AI
Xiaoqi Zhao, Youwei Pang, Kailai Zhou
Scientific figures give research ideas a visual form through choices of abstraction, composition, and emphasis. Generative AI offers new ways to realize these choices, raising questions about explanatory clarity and purposeful visual expression. We examine these questions through a visual retrospective of 371 motivation and framework figures from 200 papers. The corpus comprises a quota-based main sample of 160 papers spanning four temporal periods and a separate purposive style-contrast sample of 40 papers. A single multimodal judge evaluates six dimensions of communication and design, with three repeated judgments per figure. We attempt source-constrained revisions of all 371 figures, of which 369 pass the recorded fidelity checks. Original-figure ratings show no uniform decline across periods. Revisions increase mean clarity ratings by 0.428 points and decrease aesthetic coherence ratings by 0.111 points on a five-point scale. Gains in the six-dimension average are larger for main-sample motivation figures than for frameworks. Case analyses show that added explanation can clarify comparisons while leaving typographic hierarchy and visual economy unresolved. These model-based findings support researcher-led design, with AI assisting exploration and authors retaining responsibility for explanatory purpose, composition, and scientific relationships. The accompanying atlas and evaluation records are available at https://ntu-ai4x.github.io/Rethinking_Figures/index_en.html.