#01Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
Unbundling Multimodal Vision Encoding
Ellis Brown, Chris Hoang, Shengyi Qian and 9 more
How multimodal language models should encode visual input remains up for debate. Most models use a pretrained vision encoder, while some recent recipes train the encoder from scratch with the language model or remove it entirely. Vision encoders bundle together three design choices: a visual prior from upstream pretraining, dedicated vision capacity, and pre-fusion placement of that capacity (i.e., before the multimodal backbone). Because published models also differ in data, architecture, and compute, comparing them cannot isolate the effect of each choice. We disentangle these choices via a controlled framework where we pretrain all models from scratch on common data and compare them on visual question answering and language benchmarks at matched lifetime compute. We find that the visual prior is not necessary; an encoder trained jointly from scratch is on par with a pretrained one, without a separate training stage. What matters instead is dedicated vision capacity: an encoder-free model trails on visual understanding even when its backbone is enlarged by the encoder's parameter count. Yet that capacity need not precede multimodal fusion, as vision-only modules added in-fusion to early backbone layers perform comparably to a pre-fusion encoder and can lower time to first token. These results also hold across backbone sizes, when encoder pretraining is treated as free, and when starting from a pretrained language model. Overall, our findings favor dedicated vision capacity trained jointly with the backbone and placed early within it.
#02Nov 12, 2026
cs.AI
Al-Ghasali: A Computational Framework for Simulating Islamic Jurisprudential Rulings via Finite State Automata and Large Language Models
Elnaserledinellah Mahmoud Abdelwahab
This paper presents Al Ghasali, a computational framework designed to formalize and simulate Islamic jurisprudential (Fiqh) rulings. Building upon recent set theoretic formalizations of al sabr wa al Taqsim that extract minimal operational rules as simple Horn clause logical programs, this work proves that the semantics of closed Fiqh chapters collapse completely to deterministic Finite State Automata (FSA). We establish a formal computational hierarchy, demonstrating that restricting formalization to finite propositional Horn theories guarantees decidability and constant time (O(1)) verdict extraction after offline compilation. The framework formally proves that hierarchical compositions of sub-chapter FSAs preserve this O(1) complexity, and that temporal juristic requirements, such as Tartib (order), are deterministically flattened into static ontological states, preserving the memoryless property of the automaton. To generate human-readable juristic summaries, Al Ghasali incorporates Large Language Models (LLMs) via an architecture where the deterministic FSA strictly controls the probabilistic LLM. Crucially, the paper formulates sufficient design safety conditions for this FSA LLM integration, ensuring strict adherence to the epistemological boundaries of Usul al Fiqh. To neutralize the risk of LLM hallucination, the system employs a Grammar Guided Constrained Decoding mechanism. We formally define the mapping function that dynamically constructs unambiguous right linear grammars from the FSA execution history. The paper mathematically proves that this architecture, augmented by a Bounded Neutral Lexicon and Valence Locking, guarantees the absolute absence of Decisional Hallucination, Juristic Factual Hallucination, and Semantic Inversion reducing the LLM to a pure linguistic transformer of deterministic juristic facts
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.AI
Ballad: Bandit-Based LLM Routing for Automated Heuristic Discovery
Samidha Verma, Ankit Anand, Sayan Ranu
Modern automated heuristic discovery (AHD) systems increasingly rival hand-crafted heuristics by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to iteratively mutate and refine solutions. A natural assumption is that more powerful and more expensive models consistently yield better heuristics. We challenge this empirically: across multiple NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems, we find no consistent advantage for larger, costlier models. This raises a deeper question: given a pool of LLMs spanning frontier and freely hosted or open-weight models, how should one adaptively select which model to invoke at each step of the search? The challenge is non-trivial. The optimal LLM may shift over the course of a run, and because one LLM's output seeds the context for subsequent calls, each model's reward signal is non-stationary and entangled across the heuristic population, thus violating the independence assumptions of classical online decision-making settings. We address this through Ballad (Bandit-based LLM Routing for Automated Heuristic Discovery), an online bandit algorithm that learns to orchestrate a pool of LLMs into an ensemble that matches or exceeds what any soloist LLM achieves alone. This orchestration is powered by an LLM selection policy that favors rare, high-scoring heuristics over stable averages, a DAG-based credit propagation mechanism through the genealogy of the heuristic population, and discounting of stale observations to remain attuned to each model's current utility. Across five NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems and a pool of four models of varying capability and cost, Ballad not only matches the best individual LLM in hindsight but, in several cases, surpasses every individual model while reducing API cost by up to 65.6% relative to always using the strongest model.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.DS
Sketching Language Models for Context Attribution
Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta, Grigoris Velegkas and 1 more
Context attribution asks how removing parts of a prompt changes a language model's output. We study leave-one-out (LOO) attribution for a prompt of $n$ tokens and a fixed measurement function. Computing all LOO values directly requires $n$ model evaluations. Under a stability assumption, our algorithm estimates all LOO values to error proportional to $\varepsilon$ with constant probability using $O(\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}/\varepsilon)$ evaluation calls. To complement our upper bound, we prove a matching $Ω(\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}/\varepsilon)$ lower bound on the number of evaluation calls in an oracle model. Empirically, we verify coefficient decay consistent with stability and evaluate the performance of our sketching algorithm on a small language-model retrieval task. Technically, our result is based on a sketching algorithm for arithmetic circuits whose Taylor coefficients satisfy the stability condition recently introduced by Gunn [Gun26]. A direct adaptation of their forward differentiation sketches would require $\widetilde{O}(\log(n)/\varepsilon^2)$ evaluation calls. Our key observation is that we can apply forward differentiation to the backpropagation circuit, with only constant overhead over a forward sketch of the same Taylor degree. This reduces the variance of the sketches and is key to our improved evaluation bound. Our lower bound builds on the techniques of Amsel, Chen, Duman Keles, Halikias, Musco, and Musco [ACDH+26, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications] for lower bounding the number of matrix-vector queries to estimate the diagonal elements of random matrices.
#05Nov 12, 2026
cs.LG
Towards a Theory of Learnability via Debate
Tosca Lechner, Vinayak Pathak, Sivan Sabato and 1 more
Debate has been recently proposed as a training protocol that is hoped to produce more aligned models even as model capabilities scale. The idea is that the human, instead of providing supervision in the form of labels, judges a debate between two models that compete to prove the correctness of opposite labels. It can be shown that functions of a much higher computational complexity can be correctly judged in this way, compared to the complexity of functions that can be directly evaluated using a computationally weak evaluator. This suggests that perhaps debate can be used to teach very complicated functions to models. However, previous work has largely ignored the fact that this is a training protocol, and simply analyzes the game being played between the two debaters for a known judge. We take the first steps towards understanding the learning problem implicit within the protocol, by formulating it as an online learning problem. We show that once we formulate the learning problem precisely, there are cases where the best way to learn given access to a judge is different from running an adversarial debate. This motivates us to define a cooperative version of the protocol, whose learnability we characterize using a combinatorial dimension. We also consider the possibility of the human judge being fallible and occasionally judging the debate incorrectly. We show that a small number of errors in judgement can lead to a large error in learning.