#01Nov 12, 2026
cs.LG
Towards a Theory of Learnability via Debate
Tosca Lechner, Vinayak Pathak, Sivan Sabato and 1 more
Debate has been recently proposed as a training protocol that is hoped to produce more aligned models even as model capabilities scale. The idea is that the human, instead of providing supervision in the form of labels, judges a debate between two models that compete to prove the correctness of opposite labels. It can be shown that functions of a much higher computational complexity can be correctly judged in this way, compared to the complexity of functions that can be directly evaluated using a computationally weak evaluator. This suggests that perhaps debate can be used to teach very complicated functions to models. However, previous work has largely ignored the fact that this is a training protocol, and simply analyzes the game being played between the two debaters for a known judge. We take the first steps towards understanding the learning problem implicit within the protocol, by formulating it as an online learning problem. We show that once we formulate the learning problem precisely, there are cases where the best way to learn given access to a judge is different from running an adversarial debate. This motivates us to define a cooperative version of the protocol, whose learnability we characterize using a combinatorial dimension. We also consider the possibility of the human judge being fallible and occasionally judging the debate incorrectly. We show that a small number of errors in judgement can lead to a large error in learning.
#02Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
FLEX-LBP: Learning Local Binary Patterns with Exact Binary Inference for Texture Classification
Mohamed Alimoussa, Amal El Kaid
Local Binary Patterns (LBP) remain among the most widely used texture descriptors, from industrial inspection to medical imaging. Yet their radius, sampling angles, color transform and thresholds are fixed by hand for each dataset. We present FLEX-LBP, which learns these parameters by backpropagation while every forward pass computes exact binary codes and hard histogram counts. A straight-through estimator acts only in the backward pass, so the deployed descriptor is an interpretable hard-binary LBP with 90 learnable parameters and unchanged inference cost. In a controlled ablation on six color texture benchmarks, the component worth learning is dataset-dependent. One configuration, applied unchanged everywhere, learns the geometry and thresholds with the color transform frozen. It improves the nearest-neighbor accuracy of the identical fixed descriptor by 3.55 points on average over five seeds, significantly on five of six benchmarks and never significantly worse. With a linear discriminant readout, it gains 0.9 points; the fully learned descriptor gains 2.7 and has the highest mean. FLEX-LBP is more accurate than five classical LBP-family descriptors, PCANet and a neural LBP on five of six benchmarks. Its mean nearest-neighbor accuracy exceeds that of frozen ImageNet ResNet-50 features (23.5 million parameters). On the Kather colorectal cancer histology benchmark, the fully learned descriptor reaches 93.8%, significantly above the best classical descriptor (Completed LBP, 92.8%). The learned radii adapt in directions that recur across seeds. Noise drowns single-pixel comparisons and illuminant change flips inter-channel ones; median sampling or gray-world normalization restores 96-97%. The code is available as a drop-in PyTorch layer at https://github.com/medalimoussa/FLEX-LBP.
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.LG
AeroZoo: A Benchmark of Well-Posed Flow Problems for Foundation Models of Aerodynamics
Peter Sharpe, Carmelo Gonzales, Corey Adams and 2 more
Neural surrogates for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are trained and ranked on datasets that each vary one design family in one flow domain. Such datasets cannot test the least that an aerodynamic foundation model must do: predict CFD-quality incompressible flow in seconds for new shapes in new enclosures. On DrivAerML, larger models and longer training barely lower Transolver's error; doubling the training cases cuts it by about 12% up to 400 cases, exhausting the dataset. We introduce AeroZoo, a benchmark and training corpus of 3,815 time-mean solutions to the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) equations with a transition model, across seven geometry families, eight enclosure configurations and Reynolds numbers from $10^3$ to $10^8$. Each sample poses a well-posed PDE problem in the form a solver receives it: the boundary meshes grouped by condition type, the prescribed values and the fluid properties. The 2,816 samples with a stable time mean form the canonical benchmark: two tasks, engineering metrics and 22 frozen splits, disjoint in geometry, that hold out geometry families, enclosures, boundary-condition layouts and Reynolds ranges. On the random split, boundary-condition tokens cut GeoTransolver's median velocity error from 76.9% to 8.4% of the inlet speed in single-seed runs (uniform inlet flow: 11.0%). ISLA, a transformer for boundary-driven PDEs, reaches 5.3% over four seeds, about 4 times the change from a finer mesh. On the same test samples, a held-out geometry family barely changes ISLA's error relative to uniform flow, and a held-out enclosure or boundary-condition layout raises it 2.4 to 9.2 times. The data and the scoring code will be released.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.LG
Physically Interpretable Basin Selection in Discrete-Variable Origami Design
Lucy Liu, Leon M. Kamp, Katia Bertoldi and 1 more
Automatic differentiation has enabled rapid progress on continuous-variable mechanical design problems, but gradient-based optimization still struggles with discrete variables. The standard approach is to optimize using a continuous relaxation of the choices, then commit to the nearest discrete design at the end. Why this procedure selects unfavorable basins is poorly understood. Here, we introduce a practical, interpretable design problem inspired by origami, in which automatic differentiation is used to design shapes with a target functional behavior. Each origami sheet has a fixed geometry, and a bilevel optimization framework tunes which one of four discrete hinge types to place at each fold. Baseline gradient-based design settles into basins with a large discretization gap: relaxed optimization solves 97% of runs, but the final, discrete solutions succeed only half the time. We find that the gap can be relieved with a surprisingly simple modification. An initialization prior uniformly biased toward the stiff, flat hinge option boosts the final solve fraction from 49% to 69%. Applying the prior adds no additional compute and leaves the optimization process unchanged. Compared to the baseline, sheets produced with the prior have greater geometric compatibility and mechanical stiffness. Directly penalizing frustration and floppiness in the outer loss function produces an even greater improvement than the prior does, raising the solve fraction to 78% and indicating that these properties help distinguish the unfavorable basins. Our results demonstrate that loss landscapes for mechanical design can have physically meaningful basins that are not robust to discretization and cause solves to fail. Targeting these basins' physical signatures, even with just an initialization bias, helps avoid them.
#05Nov 12, 2026
quant-ph
Programming Quantum Circuit Parameters with Large Language Models
Tiago de Souza Farias, Caio Moraes Porto, Matheus da Silva Fonseca and 3 more
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the ability to generate parameters for variational quantum circuits without conventional optimization. However, the conditions under which this approach is effective remain unclear. Here, we investigate a frozen, general-purpose LLM that generates complete circuit parameter vectors from symbolic circuit and Hamiltonian descriptions, with optional iterative energy feedback. We evaluate the approach on general random Hamiltonians, structured parent Hamiltonians, and molecular systems. For general Hamiltonians, LLM-generated parameters exhibit larger energy errors than conventional Adam optimization, while additional feedback generally provides limited improvement. In contrast, for structured Hamiltonians, the LLM can generate promising low-energy parameter configurations, suggesting that identifiable physical and mathematical structure facilitates parameter inference. We also show that direct LLM predictions of minimum energies can violate the Hamiltonian spectral lower bound, whereas generated circuit parameters allow independent evaluation of physically realizable energy expectation values. Finally, we investigate blind circuit interpretation and find that the LLM can predict measurement outcomes even when it fails to identify the underlying quantum algorithm. These findings highlight the role of problem structure, the limitations of iterative LLM optimization, and the importance of independently verifiable predictions in quantum parameter programming.