ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

Enhancing Preference Detection using Eye Movement Cascade and Multilayer Combinatorial Fusion

Yuanhong Wu, Mary Tsaryk, Sam Watson and 3 more

Understanding how visual attention influences human preference formation is a fundamental problem in consumer behavior and cognitive science. In this work, we investigate how eye movement patterns can be used to predict preference decisions when subjects compare two alternatives. To address this problem, we analyze an eye-tracking dataset, where subjects view pairs of face images and their gaze behavior is recorded throughout the decision process. We model this problem using multiple machine learning classifiers and apply the Multi-layer Combinatorial Fusion (MCF) framework to iteratively combine diverse models. The MCF framework expands models to a large pool of model fusions and then reduces them based on cognitive diversity, repeating this process across layers until diversity diminishes. Experimental results show that MCF significantly improves performance over individual models. The best single model achieves a Pre@k of 0.90, which is improved to 0.9143 after the first layer of MCF, and further increased to 0.9286 in the second layer. This progression demonstrates that the second layer not only surpasses the performance of the first layer but also outperforms the best individual model, highlighting the effectiveness of leveraging diversity through multi-layer fusion.

#02Nov 12, 2026

cs.DS

Combinatorial Bernoulli Factories with Polynomially Many Coins

Renato Paes Leme, Rad Niazadeh

We provide an efficient implementation of combinatorial Bernoulli factories. Such a factory turns coins of unknown biases $x$ into a random vertex of a polytope $P$ whose mean is exactly $x$. For every affine slice of the cube (the class of polytopes that admit a factory), we give a single algorithm whose expected number of coin flips and running time at every interior $x$ are polynomial in the dimension and in $1/{δ_*}$, where ${δ_*}=\min_i\{x_i,1-x_i\}$ is never supplied to the algorithm. For perfect matchings this gives $O(n^{8}{δ_*}^{-2}\log(n/{δ_*}))$ flips, while the factory of Niazadeh, Paes Leme, and Schneider [STOC 2021] spends at least $n^{2n-1}$ flips in expectation at the uniform doubly stochastic matrix. For other polytopes, our method rounds exactly given a point deep inside $P$ and the promise that $x$ is far from the boundary of $P$.

#03Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

A Convex-Analytic Reformulation for Poisoning Attacks on Logistic Regression

Carina Moreira Costa, Maria Eduarda Pinheiro, Martin Schmidt

We study data poisoning attacks on logistic regression with $\ell_2$-regularization, where an attacker chooses the features of a fixed number of injected observations with prescribed labels to maximize the logistic loss on the clean training data. Strong convexity of the defender's problem yields an exact reformulation through its first-order optimality conditions. Using convex conjugacy of the softplus function, we replace the sigmoid relations by a single convex optimality-gap inequality and express the attacker's objective as a concave function. A change of variables makes the stationarity condition affine, leaving bounded bilinear equalities as the only nonconvex constraints. We derive finite bounds on all variables involved in these equalities, including a global bound on the coefficient norm and tighter bounds obtained by preprocessing based on convex optimization. Experiments on eight binary classification datasets evaluate attack effectiveness and compare the two reformulations when solved with \textsf{SCIP}. Attacks obtained by local optimization degrade predictive performance on most datasets, while the convex-analytic formulation produces substantially stronger reported dual bounds within a fixed time limit.

#04Nov 12, 2026

cs.IR

Sheaf-Inspired Structured Scoring Extensions of LightGCN for Collaborative Filtering

Ksenia Belkovskaya, Timur Lidzhiev, Maria Stebliy and 1 more

Graph-based collaborative filtering learns user and item representations by propagating embeddings over a user--item interaction graph. We investigate a modular, sheaf-inspired scoring extension placed on top of a three-layer LightGCN backbone. The motivation comes from cellular sheaves, where local vector spaces are related by linear restriction maps; here, this idea motivates structured, pair-dependent transformations of user and item embeddings rather than a change to graph propagation. We compare the identity inner-product scorer, diagonal, rank-one low-rank, and full matrix residual scorers, and a parameter-matched residual MLP baseline (\texttt{mlp\_full}) on Amazon-Book, Gowalla, MovieLens-1M, and Yelp2018. We report ranking quality and catalog coverage at cutoffs 10 and 20. The selected structured variants show modest, dataset-dependent changes in ranking quality and sometimes substantial changes in coverage. Our method is inspired by sheaf geometry but does not construct a cellular sheaf or implement sheaf-Laplacian diffusion; the experiments therefore do not establish a causal benefit from sheaf geometry itself.

#05Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

Negative-Only Policy Optimization for One-Sided Verifiable Rewards

Jiacheng Xu, Shuo He, Fuxiang Zhang and 2 more

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) typically relies on a verifier that can reliably judge whether sampled solutions are correct. However, in many realistic settings, complete verification is generally unavailable, while cheap checks can only falsify failures. We formalize this regime as one-sided verifiability (OSV): verified negatives are reliable counterexamples, but verified positives are merely non-falsified candidates and may contain many false positives. This asymmetry makes standard RLVR unreliable, because reinforcing verified positives can directly reward shortcuts that pass partial checks. To address this issue, we propose Negative-Only Policy Optimization (NOPO), which treats verified positives as unlabeled and updates the policy only by suppressing trusted verified negatives. Specifically, NOPO combines a reference-relative negative suppression loss with a group-level adapter that scales each update by the proportion of non-falsified responses. Across unit-test, constraint-check, and LLM self-verifiers, NOPO improves pass@k over baselines on code, logic, and math benchmarks when oracle rewards are unavailable. These gains persist under inference-time scaling and cross-benchmark transfer.