ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

A Convex-Analytic Reformulation for Poisoning Attacks on Logistic Regression

Carina Moreira Costa, Maria Eduarda Pinheiro, Martin Schmidt

We study data poisoning attacks on logistic regression with $\ell_2$-regularization, where an attacker chooses the features of a fixed number of injected observations with prescribed labels to maximize the logistic loss on the clean training data. Strong convexity of the defender's problem yields an exact reformulation through its first-order optimality conditions. Using convex conjugacy of the softplus function, we replace the sigmoid relations by a single convex optimality-gap inequality and express the attacker's objective as a concave function. A change of variables makes the stationarity condition affine, leaving bounded bilinear equalities as the only nonconvex constraints. We derive finite bounds on all variables involved in these equalities, including a global bound on the coefficient norm and tighter bounds obtained by preprocessing based on convex optimization. Experiments on eight binary classification datasets evaluate attack effectiveness and compare the two reformulations when solved with \textsf{SCIP}. Attacks obtained by local optimization degrade predictive performance on most datasets, while the convex-analytic formulation produces substantially stronger reported dual bounds within a fixed time limit.

#02Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

AeroZoo: A Benchmark of Well-Posed Flow Problems for Foundation Models of Aerodynamics

Peter Sharpe, Carmelo Gonzales, Corey Adams and 2 more

Neural surrogates for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are trained and ranked on datasets that each vary one design family in one flow domain. Such datasets cannot test the least that an aerodynamic foundation model must do: predict CFD-quality incompressible flow in seconds for new shapes in new enclosures. On DrivAerML, larger models and longer training barely lower Transolver's error; doubling the training cases cuts it by about 12% up to 400 cases, exhausting the dataset. We introduce AeroZoo, a benchmark and training corpus of 3,815 time-mean solutions to the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) equations with a transition model, across seven geometry families, eight enclosure configurations and Reynolds numbers from $10^3$ to $10^8$. Each sample poses a well-posed PDE problem in the form a solver receives it: the boundary meshes grouped by condition type, the prescribed values and the fluid properties. The 2,816 samples with a stable time mean form the canonical benchmark: two tasks, engineering metrics and 22 frozen splits, disjoint in geometry, that hold out geometry families, enclosures, boundary-condition layouts and Reynolds ranges. On the random split, boundary-condition tokens cut GeoTransolver's median velocity error from 76.9% to 8.4% of the inlet speed in single-seed runs (uniform inlet flow: 11.0%). ISLA, a transformer for boundary-driven PDEs, reaches 5.3% over four seeds, about 4 times the change from a finer mesh. On the same test samples, a held-out geometry family barely changes ISLA's error relative to uniform flow, and a held-out enclosure or boundary-condition layout raises it 2.4 to 9.2 times. The data and the scoring code will be released.

#03Nov 12, 2026

cs.CL

Goal Encoding in LLMs

Arnab Sen Sharma, Eric Todd, Sheridan Feucht and 7 more

We investigate whether and how LLMs encode goals: internal neural representations that precede and guide action, and that are flexible enough to be realized through many different execution paths. We construct a coding setting with multiple sub-tasks that allows us to evaluate goal-seeking behavior and the selection of sub-goals. In this setting, we localize an encoding of the next sub-goal in the outputs of a sparse set of attention heads. The same heads can be used to decode the LM's future actions in natural language (e.g., "I'm checking if a word is a palindrome"). We verify that this encoding is causal for next action and is plastic: transplanting it into a different environment, e.g., another programming language, triggers the same operation realized with a different sequence of tokens. The LM also sustains the encoding throughout the action's execution, which is puzzling because a transformer LM without recurrence cannot carry a state forward for more tokens than it has layers left. We propose that it does not need to. Under a non-recurrent goal-seeking (NRGS) account, the LM frequently re-reads the goal from the task specification, compares it with the progress visible in the growing context, and pursues what remains. We test the predictions of this account with targeted causal interventions.

#04Nov 12, 2026

cs.DS

Sketching Language Models for Context Attribution

Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta, Grigoris Velegkas and 1 more

Context attribution asks how removing parts of a prompt changes a language model's output. We study leave-one-out (LOO) attribution for a prompt of $n$ tokens and a fixed measurement function. Computing all LOO values directly requires $n$ model evaluations. Under a stability assumption, our algorithm estimates all LOO values to error proportional to $\varepsilon$ with constant probability using $O(\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}/\varepsilon)$ evaluation calls. To complement our upper bound, we prove a matching $Ω(\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}/\varepsilon)$ lower bound on the number of evaluation calls in an oracle model. Empirically, we verify coefficient decay consistent with stability and evaluate the performance of our sketching algorithm on a small language-model retrieval task. Technically, our result is based on a sketching algorithm for arithmetic circuits whose Taylor coefficients satisfy the stability condition recently introduced by Gunn [Gun26]. A direct adaptation of their forward differentiation sketches would require $\widetilde{O}(\log(n)/\varepsilon^2)$ evaluation calls. Our key observation is that we can apply forward differentiation to the backpropagation circuit, with only constant overhead over a forward sketch of the same Taylor degree. This reduces the variance of the sketches and is key to our improved evaluation bound. Our lower bound builds on the techniques of Amsel, Chen, Duman Keles, Halikias, Musco, and Musco [ACDH+26, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications] for lower bounding the number of matrix-vector queries to estimate the diagonal elements of random matrices.

#05Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

Symmetry in Time: A Representation Theory of Linear Recurrent Memory

Anif N. Shikder, Ramit Dey, Jan Minac and 1 more

State space models (SSMs) are an emerging alternative to Transformers. SSMs offer linear-time inference and parallel training, but most implementations make the parallel scan efficient by making the recurrence diagonal: each channel of the hidden state is multiplied by an input-dependent real or complex number. These numbers commute, so the state records which inputs occurred but not their order. We formalize this with representation theory, which explains and fixes the state-tracking failures previously reported for SSMs. The state update defines a linear representation of the monoid of input sequences, and we show that an SSM tracks a group at every sequence length exactly when that group is a quotient of the group generated by its transition matrices. Two consequences follow. Diagonal real- and complex-valued SSMs can track only commutative groups, while the transition matrices of any SSM that can track a group must split into independent blocks over the real, complex, and quaternion numbers. We then introduce HyperSSM, which adds quaternion channels while keeping linear-time inference and parallel training. Trained only on final answers, HyperSSM solves the group tasks of recent state-tracking benchmarks exactly with at most five state numbers. This includes $S_5$ with 32 generators, where previous SSMs are at chance, and HyperSSM generalizes to sequences 25 times longer than those seen in training. Because the theory says what the transitions must encode, the learned weights of the linear recurrence can be interpreted directly. We demonstrate this by recovering the calibration of a real gyroscope, the rotations of imperfect qubit gates and the geometry of protein backbones.