#01Nov 12, 2026
cs.LG
Two mathematical models of knowledge distillation
Audrey Xie, Ludwig Schmidt, John Duchi
Many hypotheses compete to explain the successes of knowledge distillation. To help address this, we propose and analyze a mathematical model of distillation, which suggests that distillation's performance comes not from obtaining better models but from easier to optimize landscapes. For generalized linear models trained with stochastic gradient descent, we prove that distillation fits performant student models asymptotically more quickly than non-distilled models. In rank-1 matrix approximation, we characterize conditions on the target matrix under which gradient descent with distillation converges strictly faster than training on the supervised objective. The theory helps delineate the ways distillation provides benefits (i.e., in optimization speed, not in generalization), and experiments on real datasets corroborate the theoretical predictions.
#02Nov 12, 2026
cs.CL
Goal Encoding in LLMs
Arnab Sen Sharma, Eric Todd, Sheridan Feucht and 7 more
We investigate whether and how LLMs encode goals: internal neural representations that precede and guide action, and that are flexible enough to be realized through many different execution paths. We construct a coding setting with multiple sub-tasks that allows us to evaluate goal-seeking behavior and the selection of sub-goals. In this setting, we localize an encoding of the next sub-goal in the outputs of a sparse set of attention heads. The same heads can be used to decode the LM's future actions in natural language (e.g., "I'm checking if a word is a palindrome"). We verify that this encoding is causal for next action and is plastic: transplanting it into a different environment, e.g., another programming language, triggers the same operation realized with a different sequence of tokens. The LM also sustains the encoding throughout the action's execution, which is puzzling because a transformer LM without recurrence cannot carry a state forward for more tokens than it has layers left. We propose that it does not need to. Under a non-recurrent goal-seeking (NRGS) account, the LM frequently re-reads the goal from the task specification, compares it with the progress visible in the growing context, and pursues what remains. We test the predictions of this account with targeted causal interventions.
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
K2V: Generative Keyframing For Physically Plausible Video Generation
Felix O'Mahony, Daniel Olmeda Reino, Roberto Cipolla and 1 more
Video diffusion models are able to generate samples with high-quality appearance and textural qualities. However, content produced by these methods is known to exhibit significant physical errors. This is because, in a classical video generation setting, all physical reasoning must take place simultaneously and exclusively within the diffusion process.We propose to resolve these issues by redistributing the task of physical reasoning onto a language model-backed keyframe generation module, which allows for explicit reasoning in language, and fine-grained control over the appearance of the video at important moments in the video. We then condition a video generation model with these keyframes, reducing the role of the diffusion model to the simpler task of interpolating between physically-correct intermediate states, rather than inferring an entire sequence with diffusion. Results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the Physics-IQ Verified benchmark and PhyGenBench.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
FLEX-LBP: Learning Local Binary Patterns with Exact Binary Inference for Texture Classification
Mohamed Alimoussa, Amal El Kaid
Local Binary Patterns (LBP) remain among the most widely used texture descriptors, from industrial inspection to medical imaging. Yet their radius, sampling angles, color transform and thresholds are fixed by hand for each dataset. We present FLEX-LBP, which learns these parameters by backpropagation while every forward pass computes exact binary codes and hard histogram counts. A straight-through estimator acts only in the backward pass, so the deployed descriptor is an interpretable hard-binary LBP with 90 learnable parameters and unchanged inference cost. In a controlled ablation on six color texture benchmarks, the component worth learning is dataset-dependent. One configuration, applied unchanged everywhere, learns the geometry and thresholds with the color transform frozen. It improves the nearest-neighbor accuracy of the identical fixed descriptor by 3.55 points on average over five seeds, significantly on five of six benchmarks and never significantly worse. With a linear discriminant readout, it gains 0.9 points; the fully learned descriptor gains 2.7 and has the highest mean. FLEX-LBP is more accurate than five classical LBP-family descriptors, PCANet and a neural LBP on five of six benchmarks. Its mean nearest-neighbor accuracy exceeds that of frozen ImageNet ResNet-50 features (23.5 million parameters). On the Kather colorectal cancer histology benchmark, the fully learned descriptor reaches 93.8%, significantly above the best classical descriptor (Completed LBP, 92.8%). The learned radii adapt in directions that recur across seeds. Noise drowns single-pixel comparisons and illuminant change flips inter-channel ones; median sampling or gray-world normalization restores 96-97%. The code is available as a drop-in PyTorch layer at https://github.com/medalimoussa/FLEX-LBP.
#05Nov 12, 2026
cs.LG
Towards a Theory of Learnability via Debate
Tosca Lechner, Vinayak Pathak, Sivan Sabato and 1 more
Debate has been recently proposed as a training protocol that is hoped to produce more aligned models even as model capabilities scale. The idea is that the human, instead of providing supervision in the form of labels, judges a debate between two models that compete to prove the correctness of opposite labels. It can be shown that functions of a much higher computational complexity can be correctly judged in this way, compared to the complexity of functions that can be directly evaluated using a computationally weak evaluator. This suggests that perhaps debate can be used to teach very complicated functions to models. However, previous work has largely ignored the fact that this is a training protocol, and simply analyzes the game being played between the two debaters for a known judge. We take the first steps towards understanding the learning problem implicit within the protocol, by formulating it as an online learning problem. We show that once we formulate the learning problem precisely, there are cases where the best way to learn given access to a judge is different from running an adversarial debate. This motivates us to define a cooperative version of the protocol, whose learnability we characterize using a combinatorial dimension. We also consider the possibility of the human judge being fallible and occasionally judging the debate incorrectly. We show that a small number of errors in judgement can lead to a large error in learning.