#01Nov 12, 2026
quant-ph
Programming Quantum Circuit Parameters with Large Language Models
Tiago de Souza Farias, Caio Moraes Porto, Matheus da Silva Fonseca and 3 more
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the ability to generate parameters for variational quantum circuits without conventional optimization. However, the conditions under which this approach is effective remain unclear. Here, we investigate a frozen, general-purpose LLM that generates complete circuit parameter vectors from symbolic circuit and Hamiltonian descriptions, with optional iterative energy feedback. We evaluate the approach on general random Hamiltonians, structured parent Hamiltonians, and molecular systems. For general Hamiltonians, LLM-generated parameters exhibit larger energy errors than conventional Adam optimization, while additional feedback generally provides limited improvement. In contrast, for structured Hamiltonians, the LLM can generate promising low-energy parameter configurations, suggesting that identifiable physical and mathematical structure facilitates parameter inference. We also show that direct LLM predictions of minimum energies can violate the Hamiltonian spectral lower bound, whereas generated circuit parameters allow independent evaluation of physically realizable energy expectation values. Finally, we investigate blind circuit interpretation and find that the LLM can predict measurement outcomes even when it fails to identify the underlying quantum algorithm. These findings highlight the role of problem structure, the limitations of iterative LLM optimization, and the importance of independently verifiable predictions in quantum parameter programming.
#02Nov 12, 2026
stat.ML
Quantifying structural stability of transparent models for general insurance pricing
Félix Côté, Marie-Pier Côté
The short duration of general insurance contracts leads to rapid distributional shifts in the data, warranting regular model updates. This process may yield a post-update model that differs considerably from the pre-update model in both predictions and structure. Structural stability is upstream of predictive stability, yet existing structural stability metrics are mostly restricted to simple decision trees. Thus, we first introduce the notion of functional transparency, characterising models with a prediction function that can be expressed as a sum of univariate functions for main effects and bivariate functions for pairwise interactions. Then, we propose the Mean Squared Shape function distance, a metric to quantify the structural stability of functionally transparent models, which are particularly relevant in actuarial science. Using three public auto insurance datasets, we present a benchmark study to demonstrate the usefulness of our metric in identifying a stable and accurate transparent model. Generalised linear models with centred numerical covariates are stable, and explainable boosting machines (EBMs) offer a compromise between stability and performance. We also find that stabilisation strategies, such as sequential modelling and fixed hyperparameters, can substantially improve stability for both EBM and XGBoost models, with negligible impact on performance.
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
Spatial Foundry: A Multimodal Dataset for Spatial Intelligence
Ethan Lin, Yang Song
Spatial intelligence requires connecting visual observations to the geometry, objects, and persistent state of an environment. Images alone leave these relationships implicit, while disconnected annotations make it difficult to study appearance, camera motion, and scene changes under a common reference. We introduce Spatial Foundry, a collection of 5,280 furnished residential 3D scene configurations with editable assets and aligned visual, geometric, and temporal data. Its modalities include floor plans, perspective and panoramic RGB, metric depth, point clouds, meshes, instance-level 3D bounding boxes, and camera trajectories paired with video. Shared scene coordinates link observations across views and time; editable source scenes enable additional camera paths and controlled object changes. We describe the data representation and construction workflow, and discuss applications in floor-plan-conditioned 3D generation, geometric reconstruction, instance-level perception, camera-conditioned video generation, shared world modeling, and scene editing. Controlled camera and scene variations support spatial perception and world-model research. The public project page provides videos and an interactive colored point-cloud preview.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
BrickFlow: Connectivity-Guided Brick Reconstruction
Peter Kulits, Cordelia Schmid
Given a set of LEGO parts and an image of an assembled object, our task is to infer the pose of each part to assemble the object. In contrast with traditional 3D reconstruction, doing so requires satisfying discrete physical constraints, which provide structure but render the problem combinatorial and highly sensitive to small pose errors. To learn a prior over how parts fit together, we train a set-conditioned SE(3) flow model on procedurally generated assemblies. We then finetune this model to inject image conditioning, using 1% as much data. However, while the learned flow captures global structure, it does not enforce connectivity. To address this, we introduce an analytic connectivity-field guidance to pull predictions toward connected assemblies at test time. Through this, we demonstrate improved build quality with model size, pretraining, and guidance. We make our models and data available for research purposes at https://kulits.github.io/BrickFlow/
#05Nov 12, 2026
stat.ME
When Both Sides Adapt: The Challenges of Evaluating Interactive LLM Systems
Hannah Li
In interactive systems where users engage with LLMs, users are adaptive and, after observing LLM responses, can change their prompting strategy, as well as the type and difficulty of subsequent tasks. Thus model responses can influence the set of prompts on which the model is subsequently evaluated. We study the implications of this user adaptivity and prompt endogeneity for the evaluation of LLMs. We define two classes of estimands for comparing models: the common-distribution effect, which compares model performance on the same distribution of prompts, and the induced-distribution effect, which compares each model on the prompt distribution generated through user interaction. We show that offline benchmark evaluation and live A/B testing target different quantities, with the standard difference-in-means estimators for the two methods converging to the common-distribution effect and the induced-distribution effect, respectively. This distinction can affect decision-making: the two comparisons can rank models differently and lead to discrepancies in deployment recommendations. We characterize when such ranking reversals occur and provide a sufficient condition under which the rankings are guaranteed to agree. This result provides a practical heuristic for assessing whether offline evaluation is sufficient to reproduce the decision suggested by a live experiment. Third, we show, in a stylized linear model of interactions, that user adaptivity can increase variance in estimation. Finally, we discuss implications of user adaptivity for the interpretation of experiments and show that adaptivity creates a common mechanism leading to common evaluation challenges, such as reward hacking and novelty effects. Together, this work highlights the necessity of measuring both model performance as well as changes in the user behavior that the model induces.