#01Nov 12, 2026
cs.AI
CoReMem: Cost-Internalizing Memory for Successive Coding Tasks with Prospective Valuation
Peiwen Li, Harshit Verma, Sophia Zhou and 6 more
Coding agents tackle successive tasks on an evolving repository, carrying forward edits and writing memory before the next task is known. Selecting memory for unknown next tasks requires balancing future usefulness against the costs of writing and reading it. The actor must also decide when acting on available memory saves effort as the task unfolds. We introduce Coding-Repository Memory (CoReMem), a cost-internalizing framework that guides memory design and actor adaptation through measured memory value on the next task. Prospective segment valuation compares runs of the next task with and without individual trajectory segments from the same inherited repository state, guiding a compact memory built around anchors: repository locations and executable checks. Actor adaptation estimates on-policy memory value within rollout groups with and without memory, using a reward that prioritizes resolution and penalizes step count in successful runs. Provenance-gated value credit assigns the additional value term to steps identified as using memory-supplied anchors, while every step retains outcome credit. On ChainSWE, CoReMem raises the 27B actor's resolve rate from 21.0% to 25.7%, with 17% fewer steps and 11% fewer total cache-aware tokens, including memory-module calls, relative to the untrained actor model without memory.
#02Nov 12, 2026
cs.AI
AgentSSL: Can MLE Agents Leverage Unlabeled Data?
Ethan Lin, Akanksha Sarkar, Ziang Liu and 2 more
Applying machine learning systems to new domains introduces bottlenecks in both labeled data acquisition and manual pipeline engineering. While recent MLE agents show promise in automating pipeline design, they have been studied almost exclusively in fully supervised settings, leaving them untested in realistic regimes where labeled data is scarce but unlabeled data is abundant. In this work, we introduce Agentic Semi-Supervised Learning (AgentSSL), framing SSL as a program search problem and studying how agents navigate this space under limited supervision. We find that even under weak feedback and matched compute, agents can synthesize code that combines and adapts established SSL techniques, exceeding the strongest human-engineered baselines in 8 of 12 settings by up to +21.8%. However, our results identify program selection as a critical bottleneck in AgentSSL, where performance drops by as much as 47% when selecting based on the agent's feedback metric. To systematically study this bottleneck, we introduce ProgramSelectBench, a large-scale benchmark with a combined total of 16,977 agent-generated and human-engineered SSL programs, and evaluate both unsupervised and active program selection methods. We further evaluate AgentSSL on real-world ecology detection tasks, highlighting the opportunities and challenges of transferring agent-discovered strategies beyond controlled benchmarks.
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.CL
Learning When Diffusion Language Models Should Regenerate
Minhae Oh, Jeonghye Kim, Jinwoo Koo and 4 more
Remasking allows diffusion language models to revisit generated text, but effective correction requires knowing when and what to revise. Our diagnosis on Sudoku reveals two gaps. Hidden states contain error information that token confidence does not reliably expose, and remasking an isolated error usually reproduces it when the surrounding context remains fixed. These findings motivate DiVR , a verifier that predicts whether a partially generated sequence will reach a correct answer. Trained on the final correctness of the model's own trajectories, DiVR decides when to regenerate a block and which alternative to retain, while the generator itself stays unchanged. On five reasoning benchmarks with LLaDA-8B-Base, DiVR raises the average accuracy of the fine-tuned generator from 35.3\% to 43.4\% at $1.9$-$3.5\times$ the cost of greedy decoding, above search baselines that use $3.8$-$7.4\times$. It also complements post-training such as supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, and generalizes to other generators, including Dream.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.CL
Goal Encoding in LLMs
Arnab Sen Sharma, Eric Todd, Sheridan Feucht and 7 more
We investigate whether and how LLMs encode goals: internal neural representations that precede and guide action, and that are flexible enough to be realized through many different execution paths. We construct a coding setting with multiple sub-tasks that allows us to evaluate goal-seeking behavior and the selection of sub-goals. In this setting, we localize an encoding of the next sub-goal in the outputs of a sparse set of attention heads. The same heads can be used to decode the LM's future actions in natural language (e.g., "I'm checking if a word is a palindrome"). We verify that this encoding is causal for next action and is plastic: transplanting it into a different environment, e.g., another programming language, triggers the same operation realized with a different sequence of tokens. The LM also sustains the encoding throughout the action's execution, which is puzzling because a transformer LM without recurrence cannot carry a state forward for more tokens than it has layers left. We propose that it does not need to. Under a non-recurrent goal-seeking (NRGS) account, the LM frequently re-reads the goal from the task specification, compares it with the progress visible in the growing context, and pursues what remains. We test the predictions of this account with targeted causal interventions.
#05Nov 12, 2026
quant-ph
Programming Quantum Circuit Parameters with Large Language Models
Tiago de Souza Farias, Caio Moraes Porto, Matheus da Silva Fonseca and 3 more
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the ability to generate parameters for variational quantum circuits without conventional optimization. However, the conditions under which this approach is effective remain unclear. Here, we investigate a frozen, general-purpose LLM that generates complete circuit parameter vectors from symbolic circuit and Hamiltonian descriptions, with optional iterative energy feedback. We evaluate the approach on general random Hamiltonians, structured parent Hamiltonians, and molecular systems. For general Hamiltonians, LLM-generated parameters exhibit larger energy errors than conventional Adam optimization, while additional feedback generally provides limited improvement. In contrast, for structured Hamiltonians, the LLM can generate promising low-energy parameter configurations, suggesting that identifiable physical and mathematical structure facilitates parameter inference. We also show that direct LLM predictions of minimum energies can violate the Hamiltonian spectral lower bound, whereas generated circuit parameters allow independent evaluation of physically realizable energy expectation values. Finally, we investigate blind circuit interpretation and find that the LLM can predict measurement outcomes even when it fails to identify the underlying quantum algorithm. These findings highlight the role of problem structure, the limitations of iterative LLM optimization, and the importance of independently verifiable predictions in quantum parameter programming.