#01Nov 12, 2026
cs.AI
When Expert Disagreement Hurts: Prestige and Selectivity in LLM Decision Revision
Yupeng Tang, Mingfeng Lin
When language models revise a decision after another agent disagrees, neither reversal counts nor final accuracy shows whether they are fixing mistakes or abandoning correct answers. We introduce a controlled two-pass audit that holds the question, the evidence, and the model's initial answer fixed and varies only the revision context: neutral reflection, anonymous disagreement, or disagreement attributed to a domain expert. For binary decisions the accounting is exact: revision raises accuracy only if it is selective enough, reversing wrong answers more than $a/(1-a)$ times as often as correct ones, where $a$ is initial accuracy (nine times at 90%). Across five models and 1,989 evidence-grounded decisions in medicine, science, and law, no model clears this bar under expert disagreement, and accuracy falls by up to 16.1 points. The expert label, a prestige cue, adds reversals for four of the five models, yet its effect on accuracy ranges from a 5.2-point loss to a 2.4-point gain, so reversal counts are a poor proxy for harm. With identical arguments from both sources, the label still raises reversal for three proprietary models and in a pooled analysis of four newer models. Models also respond to stated source reliability. Revision pipelines should therefore be evaluated with paired, conditional metrics, per model and protocol.
#02Nov 12, 2026
cs.RO
Rethinking Actions: Continuity-Aware Priors for World-Model Planning
Shaobo Yang, Zichen Ai, Ziyang Ma and 2 more
Actions in expert demonstrations exhibit temporal structure. An ordered-versus-shuffled analysis across five environments confirms this dependence. We ask whether action proposals that better reflect expert continuity can improve visual world-model planning. Rather than imposing generic smoothness, we learn continuations from the temporal structure of demonstrated actions. Our locality-gated deep-kernel Gaussian-process prior, LG-DKGP, combines recent and longer-range executed action history, predicts a neural continuation, and learns a temporal Gaussian-process (GP) residual. A training-derived exploration scale initializes search around the corrected mean; a frozen world model evaluates progress toward the goal. Training first fits the neural mean, then jointly optimizes the prior with the GP residual using expert future actions. The resulting planner achieves 87.07\% macro success across five simulated tasks spanning native and fragment-level goal attainment, compared with 71.03\% for INTACT, 61.66\% for PRISM, and 58.66\% for LeWM. Component interventions and expert-relative action-structure comparisons support demonstration-informed continuations and reveal task-dependent effects of visual conditioning, history length, and planning horizon.
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.AI
Natural Gradient Learning in Predictive Coding through Lateral Circuits
Lhea Beumer, Sander de Haan, Niclas Pokel and 2 more
Predictive coding (PC) trains neural networks through local energy-minimization dynamics without depending on a global error signal that backpropagation (BP) requires. Although PC is a promising alternative algorithm for efficient learning, the computational cost of inference dynamics currently outweighs the resulting learning benefits in practice. In this work, we take inspiration from optimization theory to extract more learning benefit from each inference phase. We introduce Natural PC, which augments standard PC with a lateral circuit, enabling exact and efficient natural gradient learning locally in space and time. Our lateral circuit learns the activity correlations that determine the Fisher information matrix and implicitly computes its inverse, avoiding expensive matrix inversion. Across all tested image reconstruction benchmarks, Natural PC achieves state of the art in terms of sample and compute efficiency compared to existing PC approaches. Most notably, Natural PC scales to ImageNet and matches the performance of BP trained with AdamW and various second-order optimizers at an order of magnitude lower computational cost while also using two orders of magnitude fewer training samples. Our results demonstrate that local natural gradient learning makes PC competitive with BP in both sample efficiency and computational cost in reconstruction tasks.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.DC
Reducing Batch Makespan for LLM Agent Workloads through Inference-Environment Coordination
Wei Feng, Meiling Chen, Boxiao Chen and 6 more
Efficient batch execution of agent tasks is critical to LLM training and development workflows, including benchmark evaluation, synthetic-data generation, and RL rollouts. Since these tasks alternate between LLM inference and environment interaction, we present coordinated optimizations to reduce batch makespan, the time required to complete all tasks in a batch. For hybrid LLMs, a workload-based resource model guides GPU-memory allocation between key-value (KV) cache and recurrent state and provides a reference sample concurrency to exploit parallelism while limiting recomputation. Trajectory-aware routing and scheduling promote cache reuse while balancing worker load. Under constrained environment capacity, we decouple sample admission from environment execution and introduce Chain-Advancing Action Scheduling (CAAS), which prioritizes long chains using observed progress to shorten the batch tail. Controlled replay combines actual inference with recorded environment responses and durations for ablations of individual optimizations. Live evaluations with Ling-3.0-Flash and Ling-3.1-Flash on the BFCL, SWE-bench Multilingual, WideSearch, and MCP-Atlas benchmarks demonstrate makespan reductions of 10.4% to 65.0%, while evaluation scores remain aligned. Furthermore, these methods have been successfully applied to training and evaluation workflows for the Ling-3.x model series, accelerating the model-development cycle.
#05Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
When Chekhov's Gun Fires Anyway: Over-Realization in Text-to-Image Models
Jiahao Huang, Kon Woo Kim, Song-Duo Ma and 12 more
In text-to-image generation, a target that the prompt mentions often appears in the generated image in a way the prompt does not call for. We call this failure over-realization. Mental-spaces theory points to the situations where it can happen: under a negation, inside what a character believes or imagines, as the vehicle of a figurative comparison, or behind a viewpoint that hides the target. Prior work has studied only negation in depth, and the conventional alignment and preference metrics do not penalize the failure. We build OverReal to measure it: OverReal-Gen, 698 prompts covering the four situations, on which we measure each generator's over-realization rate; and OverReal-Det, 2,841 generated images human-labeled for whether and how the target is over-realized, on which we verify the automatic judge that produces this rate. Our evaluation of eight text-to-image systems reveals that all of them over-realize, and that conventional metrics such as CLIPScore reward the failure rather than penalize it. Prompt expansion only partly mitigates the failure. Inside the generator, the diffusion backbone attends to a mentioned target almost as much as to a requested one. The cue words that should hold the target back receive less attention than ordinary words.