#01Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
Where and Why is Grounded Reasoning Useful?
David Yan, Le Xue, Forrest Huang and 4 more
Grounded reasoning, where a model outputs text coordinates of relevant locations in chain-of-thought reasoning, is a common strategy for solving complex visual reasoning problems. However, the benefits and limitations of grounded reasoning are understudied. We study where and why grounded reasoning is most useful. To do so, we introduce a chain-of-thought analysis method to measure how much a model uses its outputted grounding in its thinking trace and perform a detailed ablation study of a grounded reasoning training recipe. We find that grounded reasoning improves counting but shows no significant gain over baselines without coordinate grounding across a wide range of spatial reasoning and perception benchmarks. Using several synthetic tasks, we show that grounded reasoning is most useful when a task requires undescribable references, which are visual concepts that are difficult to describe in language. However, we observe that many existing visual reasoning benchmarks are solvable with only describable text references. To close this gap, we introduce BrickVision, a new benchmark that requires undescribable visual references to solve.
#02Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
OraRefer: Segmentation-Guided Multi-Photograph Fusion for Oral Cancer Screening with Guaranteed Patient-Level Sensitivity
Rupam Mukherjee, Mehakdeep Singh, Shirin Dasgupta and 1 more
Oral cancer and the oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) that can precede it are visible on the oral mucosa, which makes smartphone photographs a promising tool for screening. Deep learning models for this task classify individual photographs. However, screening refers patients, not photographs: a patient is usually photographed several times, and the referral decision must miss no more than a set share of patients with disease. We propose OraRefer, a patient-level screening model that reads each photograph with a segmentation-guided foundation model that conditions its class decision on the predicted lesion, combines all photographs of a patient with risk factors, and refers through a threshold with a finite-sample sensitivity guarantee. The model localizes the mouth itself, so inference needs no annotation. On 3000 photographs of 714 patients, patient-level fusion reaches an AUROC of 0.919 and outperforms attention-based multiple-instance learning. At a 90% sensitivity target, OraRefer detects 95% of patients with OPMD or cancer and misses 3 of 61 patients with cancer, at a specificity of 0.610. Because the threshold is calibrated without retraining, each clinic can set its own guaranteed operating point on a local calibration sample.
#03Nov 5, 2026
cs.RO
VisionSIM: Beyond Idealized Sensors - A Multi-Modal Simulator for Robot Perception
Sacha Jungerman, Kaustubh Sadekar, Avery Gump and 6 more
Robotic perception increasingly relies on heterogeneous sensor suites combining cameras with emerging modalities (event, SPAD, iToF/dToF, and thermal). Yet existing simulators idealize these sensors, hiding critical modality-specific failure modes that limit real-world deployment. We present VisionSIM, a unified, physically grounded simulation platform that elevates sensor realism to a first-class concern by modeling the raw physical measurement process for diverse conventional and emerging modalities. We expose fine-grained control over physical sensor parameters, reproducing failure modes overlooked by general-purpose simulators: pileup and glare for LiDAR; phase wrapping, saturation, and motion artifacts for iToF; refractory drops for event cameras; and history-dependent emission for thermal cameras. This enables principled cross-modality comparison on identical scenes and trajectories. We release the platform and a large indoor dataset with synchronized raw measurements and rich ground-truth annotations.
#04Nov 5, 2026
cs.LG
Beyond Quadratic Attention: Separable Gaussian Operators for ODE Vision Transformers
Carlos Boned Riera, David Romero Sanchez, Oriol Ramos Terrades
Self-attention carries a quadratic cost in token count, which limits how far Vision Transformers can scale with input resolution. We introduce SSoG, a separable sum-of-Gaussians spatial operator that replaces dense self-attention with a learned mixture of axis-factorized Gaussian kernels, reducing the per-layer cost from $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ to subquadratic in $N$. Unlike dot-product self-attention, whose Lipschitz constant is unbounded outside a compact input domain, SSoG with fixed kernels is globally Lipschitz continuous, which, via the Picard--Lindelöf theorem, guarantees that the continuous-depth variant has a unique solution on the whole integration interval, a global guarantee that dense-attention counterparts lack in general. On CIFAR-100 at $224\times224$, in a matched discrete-Transformer setting and in the continuous setting, SSoG improves Top-1 accuracy by 2.2--4.1 points across three model widths while using 8.8--16.6\% fewer parameters, with depth and training recipe held fixed. In a looped-Transformer setting, SSoG improves Top-1 accuracy by 5.4--8.1 points. We further probe inference-time scaling by evaluating on inputs up to $1024\times1024$ at matched batch size: in the continuous-depth (Neural ODE) architecture, SSoG reaches up to 154\% higher throughput and over 60\% lower peak memory than dense attention, with the gap widening as resolution grows, consistent with the difference in asymptotic cost. In the discrete and looped settings, SSoG also achieves over 30\% higher throughput than dense attention at this resolution. Together, these results establish SSoG as a practical, parameter-efficient, and theoretically grounded alternative to dense attention across discrete, weight-shared, and continuous-depth Transformer variants.
#05Nov 5, 2026
cs.CV
Do You Miss the Nights We Spent Crafting Figures? Rethinking Teaser and Framework Figures in the Age of Generative AI
Xiaoqi Zhao, Youwei Pang, Kailai Zhou
Scientific figures give research ideas a visual form through choices of abstraction, composition, and emphasis. Generative AI offers new ways to realize these choices, raising questions about explanatory clarity and purposeful visual expression. We examine these questions through a visual retrospective of 371 motivation and framework figures from 200 papers. The corpus comprises a quota-based main sample of 160 papers spanning four temporal periods and a separate purposive style-contrast sample of 40 papers. A single multimodal judge evaluates six dimensions of communication and design, with three repeated judgments per figure. We attempt source-constrained revisions of all 371 figures, of which 369 pass the recorded fidelity checks. Original-figure ratings show no uniform decline across periods. Revisions increase mean clarity ratings by 0.428 points and decrease aesthetic coherence ratings by 0.111 points on a five-point scale. Gains in the six-dimension average are larger for main-sample motivation figures than for frameworks. Case analyses show that added explanation can clarify comparisons while leaving typographic hierarchy and visual economy unresolved. These model-based findings support researcher-led design, with AI assisting exploration and authors retaining responsibility for explanatory purpose, composition, and scientific relationships. The accompanying atlas and evaluation records are available at https://ntu-ai4x.github.io/Rethinking_Figures/index_en.html.