ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 12, 2026

cs.CV

When Chekhov's Gun Fires Anyway: Over-Realization in Text-to-Image Models

Jiahao Huang, Kon Woo Kim, Song-Duo Ma and 12 more

In text-to-image generation, a target that the prompt mentions often appears in the generated image in a way the prompt does not call for. We call this failure over-realization. Mental-spaces theory points to the situations where it can happen: under a negation, inside what a character believes or imagines, as the vehicle of a figurative comparison, or behind a viewpoint that hides the target. Prior work has studied only negation in depth, and the conventional alignment and preference metrics do not penalize the failure. We build OverReal to measure it: OverReal-Gen, 698 prompts covering the four situations, on which we measure each generator's over-realization rate; and OverReal-Det, 2,841 generated images human-labeled for whether and how the target is over-realized, on which we verify the automatic judge that produces this rate. Our evaluation of eight text-to-image systems reveals that all of them over-realize, and that conventional metrics such as CLIPScore reward the failure rather than penalize it. Prompt expansion only partly mitigates the failure. Inside the generator, the diffusion backbone attends to a mentioned target almost as much as to a requested one. The cue words that should hold the target back receive less attention than ordinary words.

#02Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

Dataset Distillation via Drifting

George Cazenavette, Angelina Quan, Giannis Daras and 2 more

The task of dataset distillation concerns the learning of a small set of synthetic samples that can serve as an effective replacement for a large real dataset when used for downstream tasks. While many solutions have been proposed since the problem's inception, most of them primarily seek to optimize the distilled data with respect to a classifier. In this work, we propose a new distillation method that learns a set of samples such that they directly approximate the per-class data distribution. Specifically, we "drift" our distilled data in the latent space of a feature extractor such that they move both toward the real data and away from each other without using a classification objective. We find that our drifted data cover the real distribution significantly better than existing methods while still serving as powerful training samples for classification. Furthermore, we showcase our method's use as a visualization tool for better interpreting models and extend it beyond images to other modalities. Our work advances the frontier of dataset distillation, offering a novel synthesis method and proposing distribution-based metrics as a complementary evaluation. More broadly, our findings help address the growing need to understand both data and models by uncovering more about how they interact.

#03Nov 12, 2026

cs.AI

Singularity-Bench: Can Agents Build Agents?

Yang Zhou, Krish Agarwal, Zhuoming Chen and 16 more

Frontier AI agents increasingly succeed on realistic, long-horizon tasks and are beginning to improve the systems through which they operate. Yet existing benchmarks often restrict agents to narrow action spaces, use simplified environments, or rely on verification methods that are unreliable for evaluating arbitrary agent-generated systems. We introduce Singularity-Bench, an open-ended benchmark for autonomous AI development with six end-to-end tasks spanning pre-training, mid-training, post-training, inference, the agent harness, and cluster orchestration. Each task requires agents to implement core systems from a minimal starting point and evaluates them against mature human-engineered baselines on identical hardware. Additionally, through extensive red-teaming covering 9 of the 10 categories in the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, we expose reward-hacking vulnerabilities in the conventional Harbor framework and develop Breakwater, an extension of Harbor that blocks all attacks tested in our study. Across 11 agents built from 7 frontier models and 2 harnesses, Opus 5.5 with Claude Code matches or outperforms the human baseline on all six tasks with a Singularity-Index of 1.25, suggesting it may have the skills needed to reach the singularity. The remaining agents average only 0.58. Our vision is for Singularity-Bench to track how much of AI development agents can already automate and when they may transition from assisting to taking end-to-end responsibility for building stronger successors.

#04Nov 12, 2026

cs.LG

Manifold Attracting Flow Matching: Physics-Constrained Sampling via Continuous Geometric Dynamics

Guanyu Chen, Jinchen Wang, Shengze Xu and 4 more

Generating scientific data under previously unseen equality constraints requires satisfying the prescribed constraints without destroying the physical structure learned from data. Existing inference-time approaches often enforce physical constraints by repeatedly correcting predicted endpoints, but such discrete corrections can distort learned generative structure and introduce unstable feedback. In this work, we propose Manifold Attracting Flow Matching (MAFM), which continuously evolves a persistent anchor through an ODE whose dynamics drive it analytically toward the constraint manifold. Specifically, its geometric correction preserves model-guided tangent motion while prescribing the normal motion to contract constraint violations toward the manifold. This construction separates model tracking from constraint attraction and provides theoretical guarantees for residual contraction and local feedback stabilization. Experiments across geometric and partial differential equation benchmarks demonstrate improved generation quality over variant constraint-guided baselines while maintaining low constraint residuals. MAFM provides a flexible framework for coordinating learned physical structure and explicit constraints through controllable sampling dynamics, without retraining the underlying generative model.

#05Nov 12, 2026

econ.GN

Price co-movement and price information diverge across Nordic electricity zones after the energy crisis

My Thi Diem Phan, Tuyen Trung Truong, Hoai Phuong Ha and 1 more

After the 2021-2022 energy crisis, day-ahead prices in Nordic bidding zones no longer move together. We ask whether this divergence also changes the information carried by prices. The answer matters for integrating variable renewable energy (VRE), because it can help identify where wind and solar forecasts are worth producing, publishing, and using. We measured the co-movement of each Norwegian and Swedish zone with Germany-Luxembourg (DE-LU) in 2018-2025. We then used a single model, selected on 2024 data, to forecast 2025 prices at 11:00 on the previous day and tested which inputs improved accuracy in each zone. The zones moved alike until 2019, but co-movement diverged in Sweden in 2020 and in Norway in 2021, and the split has persisted. In 2024, four southern zones co-moved strongly with DE-LU (intraday correlations of 0.54-0.71), while four northern zones co-moved weakly (0.25-0.30). Yet price information did not follow this split. Previous-day neighbouring prices reduced mean absolute error by at most 2.2% in any zone, equally in coupled and isolated zones. Removing the transmission system operators' wind and solar forecasts increased mean absolute error by at most 6% in Norway, 8-16% in Sweden, and 31% in DE-LU, and the ordering held in 2024. Within Norway, the value of these forecasts showed no detectable dependence on reservoir filling. The divergence in co-movement was therefore not matched by a divergence in price information, which differed mainly between national generation systems. Thus, a zone's coupling to the continent does not indicate the value of VRE forecasts there.