#01Oct 21, 2026
cs.CV
VoxProg: 3D Spatial Reasoning through Voxel Programming
Zhichao Zhai, Menglei Zhao, Guikun Chen and 4 more
Language models' abilities to interpret tasks and generate programs offer a promising basis for 3D spatial reasoning. Yet following spatial instructions in 3D scenes requires programs to construct geometric references that language leaves implicit. In this work, we introduce VoxProg, which formulates 3D object placement through voxel programming: a language model translates task interpretations into executable programs over local voxel views of scene surfaces. Because these views index surface geometry on regular grids with explicit coordinates and neighborhood relations, an evidence program can isolate task-relevant regions and boundaries directly from scene meshes, and a downstream pose program can measure the resulting geometry to compute a target $SE(3)$ pose. Visual and numerical feedback from execution lets the model inspect intermediate selections and candidate placements to iteratively revise its code. To evaluate open-ended placement across functional use, geometric fit, and contextual arrangements, we introduce the 71-task VoxProg-Bench benchmark along with an evaluation suite pairing perceptual Intent Alignment and 3D Physical Validity. Across VoxProg-Bench and external benchmarks, VoxProg consistently outperforms relation-based, keypoint-based, and mesh-based baselines.
#02Oct 21, 2026
cs.CL
Quant-Arena: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Quantitative Trading Research
Houde Qian, Zheng Jiang, Wenyi Li and 9 more
Quantitative research is an iterative loop: a researcher proposes a market hypothesis, implements it as an executable signal, tests it on historical data, and decides what to keep. Existing benchmarks score formulas, code, or individual trading decisions, leaving open whether large language models (LLMs) can complete this loop and produce strategies that work beyond the research period. We introduce Quant-Arena, a benchmark and public leaderboard for end-to-end quantitative research on real A-share market data. A model constructs features and stock-scoring code, receives feedback only on 2022--2023, and freezes one strategy for assessment on the sealed year 2024. A cash-account evaluator applies trading constraints and costs, including market impact estimated from a simulated order book. Scores are dominated by realized excess return and complemented by signal quality and the diversity of features used by the strategy. We evaluate nine frontier models, among which GPT-6 Astra scores highest; yet no model beats the equal-weight market in 2024. Quant-Arena is open to submissions from any model or agent harness.
#03Oct 21, 2026
eess.IV
Geometric Algebra for Neural Networks: A Survey
Tao Zhong, Kaison Fong, Keqin Wang and 1 more
Geometric algebra (GA) unifies geometric primitives and transformations in a single algebraic framework. Neural networks designed around this framework often represent features as multivectors and constrain layer operations to respect the algebraic structure, enabling principled treatment of geometric transformations and, in many cases, built-in equivariance. This survey reviews geometric algebra neural networks, including their building blocks, equivariant properties, application domains, empirical performance, and software support. We provide an algebra-selection guide, an empirical comparison of GA-based and other equivariant architectures, and a failure-mode analysis covering training pathologies, deployment constraints, and performance limitations. Across the surveyed literature, the strongest evidence for GA-based architectures appears in settings with explicit geometric symmetries and heterogeneous geometric entities; evidence for broader advantages in parameter efficiency, interpretability, and dense prediction is comparatively limited and uneven. We therefore conclude that geometric algebra neural networks are not universally superior to well-tuned non-GA equivariant baselines, and outline open problems in algebra selection, numerical stability, scalable implementation, and reproducible evaluation.
#04Oct 21, 2026
cs.AI
Charts as Epistemic Actions for Experience-Driven Agentic Data Analysis
Xinzhe Wang, Xudong Weng, Zang Li and 1 more
Data agents built on ReAct-style loops now execute complex analytical workflows over structured data, yet their intermediate reasoning still runs almost entirely through text. Human analysts instead move between numbers, tables, and charts, reading visual evidence to expose trends and anomalies that text summaries drop. We ask whether charts can serve as internal epistemic actions inside a data agent's reasoning loop, and how to teach an agent to use them. We first build \probe{}, a suite of 200 controlled tasks under four matched interface conditions, and find a persistent gap between what agents can read and what they choose to use. Agents score as well from self-generated charts as from numeric output, yet plotting access alone does not translate into consistent use. Task slices show that charts lead on temporal, pattern, and anomaly reasoning, while text leads on precise reading and conditional verification. We then propose \method{}, which distils two families of experience from conditioned trajectory rollouts. One family records how to select and verify analytical operations, and the other records when to invoke text, charts, or both. A trajectory judge scores outcomes and labels intermediate steps, and a validation gate admits only experience that improves held-out performance. On three held-out benchmarks with four LLM backbones, \method{} raises analytical accuracy and visual evidence quality over matched baselines, and backbones that never drew charts begin using them, all without touching model parameters.
#05Oct 21, 2026
cs.RO
Asymmetric On-Policy Distillation Learns In-Context Exploration
Sriyash Poddar, Yanda Bao, Jacob Krantz and 5 more
Sequential decision-making under partial observability is difficult because agents must explore to infer hidden, task-relevant information before acting effectively. Learning such information-gathering behaviors tabula rasa via online reinforcement learning is sample-inefficient, whereas offline imitation averages expert actions across hidden states and fails to learn exploration. In this work, we propose ASTEROID, a simple and effective student--teacher supervised learning framework that can learn test-time exploration. Although a privileged expert never needs to explore, we demonstrate that a history-conditioned student can learn to do so when trained with on-policy contexts: the student first collects on-policy context under partial observability, and the privileged expert provides action labels conditioned on that context. By distilling expert actions directly conditioned on the student's on-policy history, the student learns to systematically resolve partial observability, i.e., search while uncertain and exploit once the hidden state is revealed. This enables efficient test-time exploration (similar to Bayesian posterior sampling) without incurring the impractical training-data costs of reinforcement learning. Across a diverse range of eleven different environments, including discrete exploration benchmarks, robotic manipulation, navigation, and Procgen environments, ASTEROID achieves ~2x higher returns under fixed exploration budgets, uses ~100x fewer interactions than RL baselines, and outperforms frontier models at exploration. Finally, our method transfers policies trained in simulation to vision-denied real-world robot manipulation, exhibiting efficient exploration and increasing success by +40% over standard distillation. Overall, it provides a simple yet surprisingly effective framework to learn efficient test-time exploration.