ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Sep 4, 2026

cs.CV

First Things First: Teaching LLM-Based Agents to Prioritize Must-Haves before Nice-to-Haves

Tianjie Ju, Xinyue Xu, Wanxuan Sun and 4 more

Recent progress in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has fueled significant enthusiasm in their potential to act as autonomous agents for real-world tasks. However, scenarios requiring agents to fulfill users' complex, structured requirements remain largely underexplored. In this work, we examine reasoning tasks under three distinct requirement scenarios: (i) Must-have requirements uniquely determine a unique feasible solution; (ii) Multiple answers satisfy the must-have requirements and are prioritized via the nice-to-have requirements; and (iii) No candidate solution satisfies the must-have requirements, in which case the agent should abstain from generating a response. We evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs on 3,649 carefully constructed problems that reflect realistic service scenarios, including e-commerce, booking, and map-based or ride-hailing. Our evaluation reveals that existing MLLMs exhibit catastrophic failures in all scenarios. They frequently misinterpret task requirements, violate must-have requirements, and produce invalid solutions. To address this critical gap, we propose First Things First Reinforcement Learning FTF-rl that explicitly optimizes reasoning over multi-priority user requirements. Experimental results show that our method substantially improves the task success rate compared to strong baselines. Moreover, FTF-rl yields general effectiveness on popular logical and mathematical reasoning tasks, including LogicVista, MathVision, and InfoQA. Our findings suggest that enhancing requirement-aware reasoning capability provides a simple yet effective pathway to improve generalization of MLLM agents. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/claire62/FTF-RL.

#02Sep 4, 2026

cs.CV

Adaptive Gated Deepfake Detection for Low-Resolution and Resource-Constrained Environments

Vaishnavi Sen, Cody Laurie, Rashida Hasan

Deepfake detection models often rely on high-quality inputs, fixed inference paths, and computationally expensive architectures, limiting their use in low-resolution and resource-constrained settings. This paper proposes AdaGate-DF, an adaptive gated deepfake detection framework that uses image-quality cues to route samples through a dual multi-exit system so high-quality images can exit earlier and save compute. We evaluated AdaGate-DF against MaD-CoRN, DefakeHop++, and ShuffleNetV2 on two benchmark datasets (Celeb-DF and FaceForensics++) under multiple configurations to test image resolution dependence and training and inference efficiency. On Celeb-DF, AdaGate-DF achieves an AUC of 0.9370, outperforming MaD-CoRN and DefakeHop++ while maintaining a low inference latency. Resolution-based testing shows consistent improvement as input resolution increases, reaching an AUC of 0.9708 at 384 by 384. The FaceForensics++ results highlight that AdaGate-DF remains effective under class imbalance, following competitive results with evaluated models. Overall, AdaGate-DF demonstrated a practical balance between detection performance, uncertainty-aware prediction, and computational efficiency for variable-quality deepfake detection.

#03Sep 4, 2026

cs.CV

From Interpretability Methods to Interpretable Models

Julien Colin, Nuria Oliver, Thomas Serre

More than a decade in, explainable AI (XAI) for computer vision has assembled a mature toolbox: attribution, feature visualization, concept-based, and circuit-based methods. Yet almost all of the field's effort has gone into building and comparing these methods, and little into the question they were meant to answer---how interpretable are our models, and are we making progress as they evolve? We argue for shifting the field's focus from methods to models, along two complementary lines. One is already within reach: existing tools let us characterize and compare what different models represent and compute. The other is harder, and largely neglected: whether a model can actually be understood by the humans who rely on it---the independent evaluators on whom trust and certification depend, not the experts confirming what they already expect. It can only be measured, not inferred. We review why the toolbox is mature enough to support both, survey the thin body of work comparing models, draw a parallel to systems neuroscience, and close with a model-centric XAI agenda.

#04Sep 4, 2026

cs.CV

Measured Sliders: Learning Continuous Controls from Differentiable Image Measurements

Yijia Chen, Boyu Wei, Xuanhua Yin

Continuous sliders are useful only when coefficient changes produce predictable image changes. Yet most diffusion sliders derive their axes from text or learned representations, leaving their scales disconnected from observable image properties. Consequently, we cannot tell in advance which attributes are learnable, compare control strengths directly, or anticipate interference when multiple controls are combined. We propose Measured Sliders, a framework that defines continuous controls through closed-form differentiable image measurements. A common measurement space unifies the pipeline. Before training, an observability test identifies usable supervision. During training, a measurement-guided objective learns target movement while suppressing non-target changes. After training, decoded calibration expresses controls in comparable units of realized image change. Multiple LoRA branches are stored in one checkpoint and composed without training on joint activations. Across SDXL and FLUX.1-dev, the resulting controls are ordered, selective, and composable. On 553 prompts, lighting direction reaches rho = 0.995 and 98.9% monotone sweeps. A five-attribute checkpoint achieves average selectivity 2.59, compared with 1.50 for the strongest baseline, and preserves every requested direction in 96.7% of pair and 86.1% of triple compositions. The observability test also separates every subsequently successful measurement from the failed candidate. Overall, image-space measurement provides a common basis for learning, diagnosing, calibrating, and composing continuous generative controls.

#05Sep 4, 2026

cs.CV

CrossDepth: Geometry-Constrained Attention for Generalizable Multi-View Surround Depth Estimation

Samer Abualhanud, Max Mehltretter

Reliable 3D understanding of the surrounding environment is a core requirement for autonomous driving. Multi-view surround camera rigs provide broad scene coverage, but the spatially adjacent images typically overlap only minimally. Consequently, the depth of most pixels must be inferred from monocular appearance cues. These cues can appear differently across images and may therefore be interpreted differently by the depth estimation model. We target two main sources of cross-image inconsistency: differences in camera intrinsics and the limited receptive field of each image. We address the former by conditioning the features on per-pixel camera-aware ray embeddings, enabling the network to account for camera-dependent variations in monocular cues. We address the latter by extending each pixel's context beyond its own image through cross-image attention constrained to geometrically plausible regions, derived from the calibrated rig setup. The model is trained in a fully self-supervised manner based on photometric consistency. Evaluations on DDAD and nuScenes show improved overall depth accuracy and cross-image depth consistency over state-of-the-art self-supervised methods under in-domain and cross-domain evaluation. Code is available at https://abualhanud.github.io/CrossDepthPage/.