#01Sep 4, 2026
cs.CV
Cross-Domain Tracker Adaptation Without Target-Domain Labels via Vision-Language Agents
Daniel Davila, Ravikumar Balakrishnan, Mike Cochran
We present a system that uses a Vision-Language Model (VLM) as a diagnostic agent for adapting a detect-to-track pipeline to a new target domain without access to target-domain labels. Rather than optimizing against annotated metrics, the VLM directly inspects rendered tracking outputs, identifies visual failure modes, and recommends parameter updates through an iterative tuning loop. We first demonstrate that ground-truth-supervised hyperparameter transfer can be brittle. On MOT17->MOT20, applying a source-derived oracle configuration reduces mean HOTA by 0.090, from a target-domain ceiling of 0.357, to 0.267. Without using any target-domain labels, our VLM-based tuner recovers 67.8% of this lost headroom, finishing within 0.029 HOTA of the target ceiling; on the highest-density target sequence, it recovers up to 86.7%. We further show that label-free Bayesian optimization with handcrafted proxy objectives struggles under large domain shifts and can degrade configurations that are already strong. In contrast, the VLM tuner acts selectively: when its visual diagnosis reveals no clear failure mode, it declines to modify the configuration, preserving performance on easy transfers while improving hard ones. Finally, we characterize the conditions under which this approach succeeds, namely, when domain shift manifests through exposed detection-level parameters, versus where it is less effective, such as MOT17->DanceTrack, where the source oracle is already near-optimal.
#02Sep 4, 2026
cs.CV
From Interpretability Methods to Interpretable Models
Julien Colin, Nuria Oliver, Thomas Serre
More than a decade in, explainable AI (XAI) for computer vision has assembled a mature toolbox: attribution, feature visualization, concept-based, and circuit-based methods. Yet almost all of the field's effort has gone into building and comparing these methods, and little into the question they were meant to answer---how interpretable are our models, and are we making progress as they evolve? We argue for shifting the field's focus from methods to models, along two complementary lines. One is already within reach: existing tools let us characterize and compare what different models represent and compute. The other is harder, and largely neglected: whether a model can actually be understood by the humans who rely on it---the independent evaluators on whom trust and certification depend, not the experts confirming what they already expect. It can only be measured, not inferred. We review why the toolbox is mature enough to support both, survey the thin body of work comparing models, draw a parallel to systems neuroscience, and close with a model-centric XAI agenda.
#03Sep 4, 2026
cs.CL
From Vision to Language: Investigating Causal Information Flow in Multimodal Decision-Making
Davide Testa, Hugh Mee Wong, Alessandro Lenci and 2 more
Vision-Language Models are commonly evaluated through their final predictions, but understanding whether these decisions are grounded in visual evidence requires tracing how visual information contributes to language-based decisions. With this purpose in mind, we investigate cross-modal information flow in a video-based generative multiple-choice-like setting by applying a layer-wise causal intervention on video-text attention pathways. We target spatial, causal, and temporal visual reasoning. Our results show that visual information is mainly integrated while the model processes the candidate answer options, which serve as the primary textual grounding sites for the final decision. We further show that nouns play an important role as semantic anchors during multimodal enrichment, while verbs are more relevant when temporal relations are processed. Finally, we identify a distinct pattern in temporal reasoning, suggesting that VLMs struggle to reconstruct sequential information across video frames, but we remark that such fragility may also reflect linguistic biases associated with specific temporal expressions used for defining the relation between events within a scene.
#04Sep 4, 2026
cs.CV
Training-Free Logical and Structural Anomaly Detection via Calibrated Fusion
Changyi Li, Miao Yu, Kai Dong and 1 more
Industrial anomaly detection must handle two distinct defect families: structural anomalies, which manifest as local texture corruptions, and logical anomalies, which violate global rules on object count, composition, or arrangement. Existing detectors typically favor one family at the expense of the other. In particular, training-free methods effectively exploit frozen representations but lack an explicit notion of object count, while methods that reason about counts usually rely on category-specific component modeling. We show that counting ability can be introduced into training-free anomaly detection without additional training or part-level supervision. Our key idea is a normal-set calibration that aligns heterogeneous anomaly cues using statistics from normal images, enabling their direct fusion within a unified training-free framework. Built upon this calibration, our detector combines complementary frozen cues to address both logical and structural anomalies. On MVTec-LOCO, our method achieves image-level AUROCs of 89.0 and 95.9 on logical and structural anomalies, respectively, yielding a 92.5 average---the best among training-free detectors in our comparison. It remains competitive with methods requiring network training or part annotations, while its structural variant matches PatchCore on MVTec-AD (99.1 image-AUROC), suggesting that the proposed calibration generalizes beyond logical anomaly detection.
#05Sep 4, 2026
eess.IV
Real-World Multi-Modal and Longitudinal Lung Cancer Dataset
Rita Cordeiro Mendes, Maria Rita Fonseca Verdelho, Carlos Santiago and 1 more
Multi-modal learning has demonstrated strong potential in medical applications by integrating heterogeneous data sources such as medical imaging, clinical records, and genomics to improve predictive performance and support clinical decision-making. However, advances in this area are often constrained by two key challenges: the limited availability of well-curated, ready-to-use datasets that accurately reflect real-world conditions, where medical data are frequently collected inconsistently and are often incomplete; and the inherent difficulty of integrating heterogeneous data modalities. In this work, we introduce a newly curated multi-center, multi-modal, and longitudinal dataset designed to support the evaluation of a wide range of learning pipelines under realistic conditions. The dataset comprises a total of 1,365 lung cancer patients and has three imaging modalities (whole-slide images, CT scans, and PET scans), structured clinical data, transcriptomic, and longitudinal follow-up and treatment information. For each imaging modality the dataset contains more than one instance. Moreover, the dataset exhibits substantial and non-uniform missingness across modalities, making it well-suited for studying robust multi-modal fusion strategies. We further provide both uni-modal and multi-modal benchmarks on the task of 12-month overall survival prediction, disease-specific survival, as well as longitudinal benchmark of hazard prediction under severe missing data. Our results show that, despite high levels of missingness, integrating complementary modalities consistently improves predictive performance over uni-modal approaches, highlighting the value of multi-modal fusion in realistic clinical settings. The dataset and benchmark code are available at https://github.com/ritacmendes/MMIST-LUNG.