#01Oct 20, 2026
cs.RO
VLM-Guided Contact Retargeting and Generative Partner Modeling for Humanoid-Human Interaction
Yuto Shibata, Kotaro Amaya, Kashu Yamazaki and 4 more
Humanoid-human interaction requires robots to operate under severe partial observability: during close physical contact, the human partner is occluded, truncated, or outside the robot's field of view, causing pose estimation to fail and often necessitating external tracking or privileged human state. At the same time, heavy mutual occlusions introduce errors into the human-human motion-capture data used for learning. We present REACT, a framework for learning deployable humanoid-human interaction policies from human-human demonstrations. REACT treats semantic contact structure as the key supervisory signal connecting demonstration processing, interaction learning, and onboard control. First, a VLM-guided contact modeling and retargeting pipeline identifies semantically meaningful contacts and transfers them onto humanoid-human geometry while preserving interaction structure. Using these annotations, privileged interaction policies learn physically grounded behaviors through interaction-aware contact rewards and are then distilled into deployable egocentric depth policies trained entirely from onboard sensing using photorealistic human depth rendering. To address severe partial observability, we introduce generative partner-state modeling objectives that predict partner motion from occluded egocentric views. We evaluate REACT in simulation and on a real Unitree G1 humanoid across five contact-rich interactions. Semantic contact modeling substantially improves preservation of demonstrated interactions, while generative partner-state modeling improves contact recall on four of five interactions, most under heavy occlusion. On real hardware, REACT performs all five interactions using onboard sensing alone.
#02Oct 20, 2026
cs.AI
Agentic Ensemble with Vision-Language Models for Visual Anomaly Detection
Shangquan Sun, Wenjun Luo, Xu He and 2 more
Visual anomaly detection aims to detect abnormal objects, while anomaly samples are often scarce during model training. Assembling multiple pretrained detectors can help by leveraging their transferable image scores and anomaly maps. However, most existing ensemble methods apply fixed fusion rules over saved predictions which struggle when pretrained detectors clearly disagree due to different training objectives, priors, and visual representations. To this end, we design AnomalyAgent, a post-training fusion framework for accurate visual anomaly detection. AnomalyAgent aligns heterogeneous scores and maps, summarizes score- and region-level disagreement, and treats fusion as a finite action-selection problem. It implements two types of actions: 1) score actions that determine how to fuse image-level detector confidence via consensus, robust aggregation, detector weighting, or score-map consistency; 2) map actions that fuse dense anomaly responses via consensus, detector weighting, geometric aggregation, or disagreement correction. A constrained vision-language model (VLM) is introduced to inspect high-conflict samples and select valid score action and map action to produce the final prediction. We evaluate AnomalyAgent on MVTec AD and VisA as primary benchmarks, together with seven additional public anomaly benchmarks and Real-IAD for large-scale score-level evaluation. Across these benchmarks, AnomalyAgent consistently improves over equal-weight fusion and achieves the best mean image AUROC and pixel AP among the compared fusion methods on MVTec AD and VisA, while demonstrating robust transfer across additional anomaly domains.
#03Oct 20, 2026
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
GBClaw: An agentic AI framework for atomistic grain boundary research and mechanistic discovery
Yazhuo Liu, Kunqing Ding, Xiaoguo Gong and 8 more
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems hold immense potential for automating complex workflows in materials discovery and design, but extending them to domain-intensive mechanistic investigations remains challenging. Here, we present GBClaw, an agentic AI framework for investigating the structure and deformation of general grain boundaries (GBs). Although general GBs constitute the vast majority of real-world interfaces in polycrystalline materials, they remain understudied because their structural complexity and interfacial mismatch complicate experimental and modeling research. GBClaw integrates large language models (LLMs) into a modular architecture comprising an orchestrator, specialized agents, domain-specific tools, simulation interfaces, and hierarchical memory. Through dynamic replanning and iterative workflow refinement, the framework effectively connects systematic simulations with targeted mechanistic analysis. Applied to 14 general asymmetric tilt GBs in nickel, GBClaw characterized interfacial defect structures and identified diverse deformation modes across these incommensurate boundaries. Comparing boundary sliding with and without secondary GB misfit dislocations revealed substantial differences in shear strength, underscoring the critical role of defect hierarchies in sliding resistance. Furthermore, researcher-guided follow-up calculations traced an anomalously high shear resistance to metastable boundary structures. This work demonstrates that combining agentic AI with domain expertise bridges high-throughput computational screening with deep physical understanding of complex material interfaces.
#04Oct 20, 2026
cs.CL
Benchmarking Arabic Dialects for Math Problems
Noor Abo Mokh, Teresa Lynn, Nizar Habash and 5 more
Mathematical reasoning remains underexplored for low-resource languages, including Dialectal Arabic. To bridge this gap, we introduce the DAR-MGSM (Dialectal Arabic Multilingual Grade School Math) Benchmark, the first manually curated benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning in Dialectal Arabic. DAR-MGSM consists of math word problems (MWPs) requiring multi-step reasoning and covers five major Arabic dialects alongside Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). The benchmark comprises two parallel versions: translated-only and translated & culturally localized. The latter version adapts entities and references to regional varieties. We evaluate eleven Arabic-centric and multilingual large language models on DAR-MGSM. The results show that the performance generally declines on the localized version, highlighting the challenges introduced by culturally grounded adaptations. However, the magnitude of this effect varies across models, with Arabic-centric models exhibiting different levels of sensitivity to localization. A mechanistic interpretability analysis shows that translated and localized variants of the same MWPs often induce distinct internal reasoning trajectories, even when aggregate accuracy remains similar. Overall, our results show that mathematical reasoning performance depends on both linguistic variety and cultural context.
#05Oct 20, 2026
cs.AI
Humans Correct Their Judgments Through Debate, but Weaker AI Models Do Not
Maria Victoria Carro, Denise Alejandra Mester, Facundo Nieto and 14 more
How can we effectively oversee AI systems that surpass human intelligence? AI Safety via Debate proposes that two AI systems argue opposing positions and a judge, either a human or a weaker model, decides which is correct. By facilitating supervisors in providing high-quality training signals, debate aims to encourage truthful and safe behavior from AI systems whose capabilities exceed our own. However, human judgment is not neutral: people often rely on biases which advanced AI systems may learn to exploit. Drawing on insights from collective intelligence and social cognition, this paper investigates whether debate can guide human and LLM supervisors toward the truth despite their prior beliefs. We evaluate several protocol configurations. We also explore setups inspired by the wisdom of the crowd such as the number and diversity of judges, as well as interaction mechanisms including deliberation and voting. Overall, we find that debate increases accuracy relative to prior beliefs for human judges, whereas the consultancy baseline, in which a single expert argues for one answer, does not. For weaker language models, however, the results are mixed: debate provides no comparable gains in most settings and can even reduce accuracy. Among multi-judge protocols, weighted voting produces the highest accuracy for human supervisors, whereas for LLMs none of them significantly improves group accuracy, even as the number of judges increases. Notably, the behavior of minority judges in non-diverse deliberation protocols suggests that, under symmetric settings, incorrect positions could be more persuasive than correct ones. These findings support debate as a viable path toward scalable human oversight, but cast doubt on its benefits for weaker AI supervisors, raising concerns about fully automated training and control pipelines in high-stakes settings.