#01Nov 6, 2026
hep-lat
Machine learning for lattice QCD
Gurtej Kanwar, Scott Lawrence, Alessandro Nada and 1 more
Machine learning (ML) methods have been explored as a means of optimizing lattice field theory calculations, with increasing interest in recent years. This chapter gives an introduction and summary to the use of ML methods to optimize lattice field theory without introducing any uncontrolled approximations. We focus on those directions which are clearly established as of late 2025, marking the 50th anniversary of the beginning of the study of lattice gauge theory. This chapter is a contribution to the online book ``Lattice QCD at 50 years,'' (LQCD@50), edited by Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Maarten Golterman, Rajan Gupta, Laurent Lellouch, and Steve Sharpe.
#02Nov 6, 2026
cs.AI
Generative Latent Priors for Interpreting and Steering Protein Language Models
Daniel Hinjos, Lucía Urcelay
Dominant methods for interpreting large models impose strong structural assumptions. Generative Latent Priors (GLP) are a complementary approach: a diffusion model that learns the distribution of a frozen model's activations directly, imposing no assumptions. We port GLP to ESM-2 activations (UniRef50) and evaluate it at two host scales (ESM-2-8M and -650M), both as a lens for protein representations and as a prior for editing them. Generation quality scales smoothly with depth and compute. As a lens, single GLP "meta-neurons" are the strongest probes of discrete Swiss-Prot concepts at both hosts, beating InterPLM's released SAE features, and lead on continuous properties at 8M though not at 650M; falsification tests show this is mostly concentration, not new information. As an editing prior, the on-manifold correction makes DiffMean steering of three biochemical properties effective and restores on-manifoldness, but only in isolation: re-embedding the sequences actually produced after several rounds of decoding, the structural plausibility is compromised. This is mainly reproduced in additional SAE-based clamping structural steering experiments, where only Helix motif succeeds. The naturalness failure is traced to the rewriting coverage and the decoder rather than the prior, highlighting what the method must clear before it can serve for both discovery-by-editing and discovery-by-exploration. Trained GLPs are released on huggingface.co/collections/HPAI-BSC/glprot.
#03Nov 6, 2026
cs.CV
GRAC: Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Captioning for Surgical Scene Description
Rochak Dhakal, Chen Zhao, Soup Cobb and 3 more
Purpose: Surgical operative reports support procedural documentation, surgical training, performance assessment, and workflow review. However, extracting meaningful information often requires extensive manual review and clinical expertise. Automated surgical scene descriptions could reduce this burden by leveraging recurring surgical activities and prior knowledge. Methods: We propose GRAC (Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Captioning), a framework that represents surgical scenes as graphs capturing relationships among instruments, actions, and anatomical structures. Given an input scene graph, GRAC learns to retrieve relevant graph-caption pairs from training data. It compares instrument-tissue interactions between retrieved examples and the input scene, using comparison features to condition retrieved-caption representations during generation. Results: On the EndoVis-18 benchmark, GRAC achieved a CIDEr-D of 5.88, compared with 4.23 for SGT and 3.36 for the strongest conventional Transformer baseline. Exact instrument-action-target triplet-set accuracy reached 52.6%, compared with 32.7% for SGT and 26.2% for the strongest conventional baseline. These results demonstrate improvements in language quality and factual agreement. On TORS, GRAC achieved a CIDEr-D of 5.06, compared with 3.80 for the strongest baseline. Conclusion: GRAC demonstrates that combining structured surgical scene representations with retrieved examples improves surgical scene captioning and produces more contextually meaningful descriptions.
#04Nov 6, 2026
cs.CL
Compaction, decay and reinforcement in a two-tier conversational memory: a paired evaluation against retrieval-augmented generation
Osamudiamen Edogun, Joshua Obigwe, Irfan Mehmood
A conversational agent that remembers has to decide what to keep. Retrieval-augmented generation keeps the transcript and searches it; the alternative is to compact each turn into atomic facts and search those. We compare the two on LoCoMo, with both arms answering all 1,985 questions in one window, against the same stores, with the same generator and judge, and both predictions on one row, which licenses McNemar's exact test on the 512 questions where they disagree. On the four categories comparable work reports, compaction scores 71.4 per cent against 64.6, a lead of 6.8 points (p = 5.5e-08) at 34 per cent fewer prompt tokens. On all five, including the adversarial set comparable work drops, the lead falls to 2.0 and stops being significant, because the baseline leads adversarial by 14.6. That loss has a structure. Our lead falls as the reference answer demands more source wording, 9.6 points ahead at one or two reference words and 3.1 behind past eight, with token overlap moving the same way, so the judge is not the cause. Compaction keeps what a fact asserts and discards how it was said, so it wins where the answer is a value and loses where it is a phrasing. We also report four negative results with their power calculations.
#05Nov 6, 2026
cs.CV
BEV3SR: Evidence-Aware 3D Spatial Reasoning from Video
Fan Zhu, Rui Yu
3D spatial reasoning from video remains challenging for VLMs because videos provide sequential, view-local observations rather than persistent metric scene records. Many questions must be answered in a query-specified perspective rather than the observed camera viewpoint, and prompting with a fixed set of RGB views may miss sparse or occluded visual cues. To address these gaps, we introduce BEV3SR, a training-free and backbone-agnostic framework for RGB-D videos with camera parameters. BEV3SR turns video observations into queryable metric bird's-eye-view (BEV) scene memory and formalizes each query into an evidence-aware spatial task. The Spatial Task Formalizer specifies the query's reference frame, spatial constraints, objective, and evidence requirement. The evidence requirement determines the appropriate reasoning pathway. A query treated as requiring geometric evidence is handled by the Geometric Reasoner, which deterministically computes the answer using the metric BEV records in the query-specified reference frame. Otherwise, a query treated as requiring visual evidence is passed to the Visual Evidence Aligner, which uses BEV-indexed object records and their associated supporting views to retrieve object-consistent and scene-context RGB frames for VLM grounding. Within a standard 16-frame budget, BEV3SR consistently improves different VLM backbones across multiple 3D scene QA benchmarks, delivering large gains on spatially intensive questions and significant improvements on open-ended scene QA. These results demonstrate that BEV3SR offers an effective, efficient, and interpretable framework for explicit 3D spatial reasoning from video.