ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 7, 2026

cs.AI

BunshinRL: Splitting Live Agent Workspaces for Memory-Efficient Agentic RL

Yutong Huang, Vikranth Srivatsa, Alex Asch and 1 more

Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) rollouts interleave model reasoning with tool calls in persistent workspaces. Scaling these rollouts incurs substantial memory costs for concurrent environments, while slow tool calls delay entire rollout batches. We present BunshinRL, an agentic RL rollout system that exploits shared environment state and recurring tool calls through three techniques: memory sharing across environments, tool-prefix caching, and speculative tool execution. These techniques build on BunshinFork, a novel live whole-workspace forking mechanism for containers. BunshinFork reconstructs process trees, shares memory copy-on-write, and preserves file, communication, and GUI state, enabling cached-state reuse and rollback after incorrect speculation. We implement BunshinRL and BunshinFork through Linux kernel module and CRIU modifications. BunshinRL reduces peak memory by up to 43%, total memory consumption by up to 51%, and end-to-end rollout latency by 23%.

#02Nov 7, 2026

cs.CV

Split and Bridge: Multimodal Generation via Diffusion Bridging

Ahmad Arrabi, Xiaohan Zhang, Xingyu Li and 1 more

Visual data are often expressed through multiple complementary modalities (e.g., images and segmentation masks), each capturing different aspects of the same underlying structure. Most existing multimodal methods adopt a top-down paradigm, learning a shared latent variable through joint training from scratch, which limits scalability. We propose Split and Bridge (SnB), a bottom-up framework for multimodal generation that couples pretrained unimodal diffusion models at sampling time. Rather than learning a unified latent space, SnB generates coherent multimodal samples by following a shared diffusion trajectory up to a split point and then branching into modality-specific trajectories guided by a bridge module. This design enables plug-and-play reuse of powerful pretrained models without joint training, making it scalable and easily adaptable. Across standard benchmarks (PolyMNIST, CelebAMask-HQ) and more complex settings (PIE-Bench++, ROCO), SnB achieves a strong balance between sample quality and coherence. We show that SnB naturally extends to downstream zero-shot tasks such as interleaved co-generation, image editing, and style coupling/decoupling. Our results demonstrate that bottom-up generation provides a practical framework that complements existing top-down multimodal approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/AhmadArrabi/SnB

#03Nov 7, 2026

cs.AI

Sampling Is Not Curiosity: Why LLM Agents Should Investigate

Alfonso Amayuelas, Piotr Piękos, Xin Eric Wang and 3 more

LLM agents are increasingly used for open-ended tasks, very common in research scenarios where they are required to explore, investigate, or act curiously. At inference time, an LLM is a fixed map from context to next-token distribution, the pretrained weights determine the function, and only its conditioning changes as context accumulates. Mechanisms like temperature, best-of-N, tree search, or RAG vary how the distribution is sampled or what it is conditioned on, but do not update the agent's model of the environment. We argue that current LLM agents do not explore curiously; they explore stochastically. From how curiosity is understood in the RL literature, it requires a predictive structure over how the environment responds to the agent's actions, which improves online from current interaction, drives action selection through its predicted improvement, and persists beyond the context window. Additionally, in its open-ended form, the agent should intrinsically originate what to investigate. Thus, we propose a framework defining curiosity in LLM agents, reserving the term for systems that satisfy it. In doing so, we identify the research directions its implementation opens up.

#04Nov 7, 2026

cs.CL

Test-Time Scaling for Diffusion Language Models with Frequency-Aware Remasking

Bowen Zuo, Yue Yu, Dongruo Zhou and 1 more

Diffusion language models (DLMs) generate text through iterative denoising, where decisions about which tokens to commit or remask strongly affect output quality. Existing certainty-aware strategies rely on instantaneous confidence or entropy, but these local signals can be misleading on difficult reasoning problems. We formulate DLM test-time scaling as adaptive allocation of both inference compute and decoding strategies. Our two-stage approach uses a fast base sampler to solve easy questions, then applies frequency-aware remasking to the remaining hard questions. This strategy tracks how often each token's prediction changes across denoising steps and preferentially commits frequently changing tokens, encouraging samples to explore alternative reasoning paths rather than collapse onto the model's preferred trajectory. Experiments with LLaDA-8B-Instruct and Dream-7B-Instruct show consistent improvements over a strong adaptive allocation baseline, with absolute accuracy gains of up to 3.73 percentage points (LLaDA) and 7.33 percentage points (Dream) on MATH-500, and absolute coverage gains of up to 11.39 percentage points (LLaDA) and 10.98 percentage points (Dream) on HumanEval. On questions unsolved by the base certainty-aware strategy after 100 samples, frequency-aware remasking recovers solutions for 3.75% to 18.75% of examples.

#05Nov 7, 2026

cs.HC

Safer for Whom? A Systematic Exploration of AI Safety in Eating Disorder Interactions

Jinyuan Wang, Minh Duc Chu, Frances Ross and 2 more

AI assistants advise users about diet, exercise, and weight loss---areas in which unsafe guidance can worsen body dissatisfaction, dietary restriction, compulsive exercise, and other behaviors associated with eating disorders (EDs). Existing evaluations emphasize diagnostic accuracy, overtly harmful prompts, or synthetic scenarios, providing limited insight into whether models recognize implicit vulnerability in natural interactions or protect users consistently. We evaluate responses from three open-weight large language models to 100 questions sourced from an online pro-anorexia community. We grade responses using clinically informed criteria that extend a seven-dimensional taxonomy of ED-related harms. We also construct matched conditions in which questions are accompanied by information about the user varying race, gender, body mass index (BMI), and explicit ED vulnerability. Safety varies substantially across models and harm dimensions. High-risk responses are approximately twice as frequent without bios, suggesting that models do not consistently recognize vulnerability from language alone. Explicit signals of ED vulnerability improve safety by 10--14 points across models. Responses also differ significantly by race, gender, and BMI, with body size producing the largest disparities. These patterns are consistent with reliance on the stereotype that EDs primarily affect thin, White women, potentially leaving users outside this profile with less protective responses.