ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 7, 2026

cs.RO

Deploying Physically and Epistemically Compliant Agents by Distilling Belief-Space Task and Motion Planners

Phillip J. K. Christoffersen, Rachel Ma, Patrick Barragán and 1 more

In this work, we train agents to act under uncertainty according to specified, belief-dependent rules. Deep reinforcement learning (RL) can in theory train agents to follow rules if encoded into well-designed rewards, but in practice, RL fails to perfectly optimize these rewards, leading to ineffective or noncompliant agent behavior. Belief-space planners by construction produce behavior in line with developer specification, but require hand-programming online planners and belief-state estimators, adding significant engineering complexity at scale. We combine the two: we plan offline to generate a dataset of sample trajectories and then distill the plans into a policy that acts on raw observations. We propose two changes to planner distillation that address problems specific to history-based policies: Dual Averaging, a loss that combines per-timestep predictive loss and average loss on task changes, and $ρ$-Optimal Reinforcement, a feedback mechanism that reinforces the policy's own successful rollouts when these are near-optimal. We provide a sufficient condition under which static search problems with noiseless observation models is complete, and show that maximum-likelihood-observation planning implies this condition in static search with continuous beliefs. We create a challenging new domain, Scavenger, where an agent needs to gain information in order to succeed. We evaluate our distilled policy in two versions of Scavenger, one where information is provided visually and one where it is provided as a command in natural language. In either case, the learned policy attains a success rate above 90% in Scavenger, compared with at most 5% for RL. We also find that distilled planners transfer with greater than 60% success to following unseen and intentionally vague commands and greater than 75% success to following floorplans larger than those seen in training.

#02Nov 7, 2026

cs.AI

Decentralised Drone Swarm Formation under Silent Failures with ACO Pheromone Claims and PSO Tuning

Md. Abu Horaira

We study decentralised drone formation, without a central planner, under the conditions that make it hard: nobody knows how many drones are alive, failures are silent, radio is short-ranged and lossy, and actuation is noisy. In our controller, ant colony optimisation (ACO) allocates drones to picture positions through claims that behave as reinforced, evaporating pheromone and are gossiped between neighbours, so evaporation doubles as failure detection. A particle swarm optimisation (PSO) law flies the drones, a noise-buffered Voronoi filter keeps them apart, and PSO also tunes the controller offline. We prove that claims of destroyed drones vanish within bounded time, that conflicts between drones that exchange tables are resolved consistently, that survivors cover the picture to within a factor of two, and that drones cannot collide while their safety cells are feasible. On held-out seeds and with two tuned configurations, the controller formed the picture in 95-99% of runs in the hardest regime, restored it after a silent loss of half the swarm in 96-100% of runs at normal difficulty, transferred unchanged to eight unseen shapes and to 300 drones, and overlapped in 5 of 21,088 runs. A CBBA-style baseline that shares the evaporating claims but uses argmax without swaps was at least as reliable as ours once tuned with the same budget, and repaired faster, whereas ours generalised better to unseen shapes. The benefit thus comes from the pheromone dynamics and from tuning, not from ACO's stochastic construction or PSO's social terms. A centralised oracle is faster.

#03Nov 7, 2026

cs.LG

HexIt: Learning Hexahedral Block Decomposition with Expert Iteration on Combinatorial Maps

Arjun Narayanan, Per-Olof Persson

Decomposing a polyhedral solid into a few well-shaped hexahedral blocks is a long-standing open problem in mesh generation. We cast it as a sequential decision problem on a 3-dimensional generalised map: an agent splits edges, faces and volumes with three insert operations until every cell is a hexahedron and the mesh passes a quality threshold, and a policy that convolves over the map's involutions chooses each insert. A successful decomposition takes over a hundred decisions, and a uniformly random policy never finds one. We clone a policy from constructed decompositions and improve it by expert iteration. On held-out chamfered solids that share no boundary topology with the cloning data, the final policy solves an expected $94.4\%$ in $20$ samples, and expert iteration raises the best-of-20 solve rate on large chamfered solids from $0.203$ to $0.355$. At matched compute, PPO, GRPO and VinePPO updates all make the cloned policy worse.

#04Nov 7, 2026

cs.LG

The Fast Tree Transform

Paul Burchard

The Fast Tree Transform is a locally-aggregated transform defined for arbitrary graph geometries that generalizes both the Hadamard frequency transform and the Haar wavelet transform on the circle. The pure frequency part of the transform approximately diagonalizes the graph Laplacian; this fact makes it useful as a preconditioner in geometric optimization problems. The full transform provides an only slightly-redundant representation of signals on the graph that allows sparse representation of signals that include both edges and textures.

#05Nov 7, 2026

cs.HC

Safer for Whom? A Systematic Exploration of AI Safety in Eating Disorder Interactions

Jinyuan Wang, Minh Duc Chu, Frances Ross and 2 more

AI assistants advise users about diet, exercise, and weight loss---areas in which unsafe guidance can worsen body dissatisfaction, dietary restriction, compulsive exercise, and other behaviors associated with eating disorders (EDs). Existing evaluations emphasize diagnostic accuracy, overtly harmful prompts, or synthetic scenarios, providing limited insight into whether models recognize implicit vulnerability in natural interactions or protect users consistently. We evaluate responses from three open-weight large language models to 100 questions sourced from an online pro-anorexia community. We grade responses using clinically informed criteria that extend a seven-dimensional taxonomy of ED-related harms. We also construct matched conditions in which questions are accompanied by information about the user varying race, gender, body mass index (BMI), and explicit ED vulnerability. Safety varies substantially across models and harm dimensions. High-risk responses are approximately twice as frequent without bios, suggesting that models do not consistently recognize vulnerability from language alone. Explicit signals of ED vulnerability improve safety by 10--14 points across models. Responses also differ significantly by race, gender, and BMI, with body size producing the largest disparities. These patterns are consistent with reliance on the stereotype that EDs primarily affect thin, White women, potentially leaving users outside this profile with less protective responses.