#01Nov 5, 2026
cs.AI
RM-VLM: From Natural-Language Task Descriptions to Vision-Grounded Reward Machines
Roko Parac, Christos Ziakas, Leo Ardon and 1 more
Reward machines (RMs) have been proposed as a reward formulation in reinforcement learning (RL) to capture non-Markovian tasks where credit assignment depends on history. By representing reward functions as automata, RMs expose the task's temporal structure and allow such rewards to be handled within a Markovian framework. However, they assume a labelling function, a proposition-grounding oracle for observations, which must be manually engineered for each environment, limiting their wider applicability. In this work, we address this limitation by proposing RM-VLM, a novel approach in which a large language model (LLM) generates an RM from a natural-language task description, and a vision-language model (VLM) acts as the labelling function, grounding the RM's propositions over image-based observations during RM-guided policy learning. A VLM-based value function estimator is used to assess the agent's progress towards each RM transition and derive a dense reward signal. We evaluate RM-VLM on three domains covering non-Markovian grid-world navigation, robotic manipulation, and 3D object collection. Our experimental results show that RM-VLM consistently achieves higher task success rates than existing VLM-based reward methods across all tested domains.
#02Nov 5, 2026
stat.ML
Unifying Central Flow, Rod Flow, and the Edge Coupling
Eric Regis, Sinho Chewi
At the edge of stability, the iterates of gradient descent oscillate along the sharp directions of the Hessian. This poses a significant challenge for continuous-time models as the usual continuous-time approximation -- the gradient flow -- admits no oscillations. Several continuous-time models have been proposed to capture the behavior at the edge of stability, among them central flow and rod flow. Although both models can be interpreted as performing a coarse-graining in time, the connection between them remains poorly understood. Here we show that both flows can be derived from a third object, the edge coupling: a functional on consecutive iterates whose critical points are the fixed points and period-two orbits of gradient descent. It is revealed that the two flows correspond to coarse-grainings at different time scales. Rod flow coarse-grains over only the fastest time scale, while central flow coarse-grains over both the fast and intermediate time scales. Furthermore, using the edge coupling, we derive rod flows and central flows for momentum methods such as heavy ball and Adam. We verify the derived flows experimentally on representative neural network architectures, where they track the discrete iterates throughout all phases of training -- including the transition from the stable regime to the edge of stability.
#03Nov 5, 2026
cs.AI
Benchmarking Large Language Models on Heterogeneous Cognitive and Biomedical Knowledge Graphs: The Role of Graph Grounding in Multi-Hop Reasoning and Hallucination Mitigation
Ali Sarabadani, Kheirolah Rahsepar Fard, Tahereh Jeirani
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in biomedical and cognitive neuroscience, but their ability to reason reliably over heterogeneous knowledge graphs (KGs) remains unclear. We benchmark five LLMs (GPT-5.1, Gemini 2.0 Pro, Llama 3, Qwen, and BioGPT) across five KGs: DrugBank, NeuroSynth, Cognitive Atlas, Brain Map, and GDPKG. We introduce a multitier query dataset to evaluate reasoning depth and factual accuracy under KG-aware (graph-grounded) and KG-agnostic conditions. Inter-annotator agreement was substantial, with Cohen's kappa of 0.781 (range: 0.753-0.807) and Fleiss' kappa of 0.77. Results show that general-purpose models, particularly GPT-5.1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro, generally outperform domain-specific models on multi-hop and high-level reasoning tasks, although performance declines as query complexity increases. KG grounding reduces hallucination rates across all evaluated models. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, domain-specific models do not consistently outperform general-purpose models on specialized tasks without graph grounding. These findings highlight the value of combining broad language-model capabilities with structured domain knowledge. We provide practical guidance for selecting LLM-KG integration strategies based on task complexity and computational constraints, and discuss hybrid neurosymbolic architectures for personalized medicine, cognitive disorder diagnosis, and explainable AI.
#04Nov 5, 2026
cs.CL
Label-Wording Augmentation in a Typed-Decision Encoder: Gains on Unfamiliar Words, Not on Abbreviations or Codes
Vladimir Beskorovainyi
Typed-decision models score options that the caller supplies at request time, so their accuracy depends on label wording that the model's developer does not control. We compare two releases of a 307M-parameter multilingual cross-encoder, Ru-Jev, trained on thirteen Russian-language tasks; the later release adds an augmentation that presents labels in several surface forms. Holding questions fixed and varying only how eighteen routing labels are worded, we evaluate ten label vocabularies, produced by three separate processes and checked for overlap with the training data, with five candidates per question and, for eight of them, also with eighteen. On held-out vocabularies made of ordinary or borrowed words (English-derived jargon, office slang, department names), the augmented release is more accurate in every setting, by up to 0.24. Eleven of these fourteen gains survive a Holm correction (slang with eighteen candidates and descriptive sentences with five do not), and for jargon on all labels the label-level interval excludes zero in both settings. On abbreviations and opaque codes it gives no usable gain: on abbreviations it is not better, and worse on the clean slice, and on opaque codes both releases stay at or below chance once labels related to training options are removed. In most cells where accuracy rises, the risk-coverage area falls, but with eighteen candidates confident errors rise on jargon and slang. On two datasets neither release saw, accuracy moves by -8.4 and +5.6 points. We also report four evaluation hazards from comparing the two releases.
#05Nov 5, 2026
cs.LG
Discovering Learning Rules that Shape Others
Hong Jun Lee, Ziyan Wang, Jun Wang and 2 more
In general-sum games, self-interested learners can reach outcomes that are poor for everyone, which has motivated methods that shape the opponent's learning. Methods like Learning with Opponent-Learning Awareness (LOLA), which differentiates through the opponent's learning process, and Model-Free Opponent Shaping (M-FOS), which uses model-free optimisation methods for long-horizon opponent shaping, have enabled mutual cooperation and exploitation of learners. However, these methods require access to the opponent's parameters, policy, rewards or learning rule during deployment. In single-agent reinforcement learning, update rules discovered by meta-learning have achieved state-of-the-art results (e.g. DiscoRL). These rules are separate from the policy they train and read only the agent's own experience. We hereby extend this framework to general-sum settings by introducing Discovered Update Rule for Opponent Shaping (DUOS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method to discover an update rule for an agent in general-sum games. DUOS meta-trains the rule to maximise the agent's expected return over its lifetime, and updates an inner network using the agent's own experience. We show that our discovered rule exhibits behaviour consistent with opponent shaping without reading opponent policies or parameters, and ranks 1st in normalised mean score and 1st in self-play among tournament entrants.