#01Nov 6, 2026
cs.AI
Assessing the Impact of Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Algorithmic Problem-Solving
Gabriel Souza Baggio, Gabriel Machado Lunardi, Guilherme Medeiros Machado and 3 more
Competitive programming problems pose distinctive challenges for Large Language Models, as they demand not only proficient code generation but also advanced algorithmic reasoning. This study presents a Retrieval-Augmented Generation approach specifically designed to enhance the capacity of Large Language Models to address such problems. Our approach integrates an embedding-based retrieval mechanism and a similarity search algorithm to identify analogous problems within a knowledge database, employing a dynamically adjusted threshold to mitigate retrieval noise. We conducted an evaluation using the CodeContests dataset, focusing on the test split problems that exhibit similarity to instances from the training split. The experimental framework considered three conditions: (i) problems provided solely with their original descriptions, (ii) problems supplemented with randomly selected examples from the training split, and (iii) problems augmented with similar examples retrieved through the proposed method. In addition, we incorporated a Min-K membership inference analysis to examine whether the generated code solutions were influenced by potential memorization of training data within the evaluated Large Language Models. This complementary perspective enables a deeper understanding of model behavior by distinguishing genuine generalization through retrieval from implicit recall of pretraining samples. Performance was assessed using both pass rates and the CodeForces Elo rating of the problems. The results provide empirical evidence that similarity-based retrieval substantially enhances Large Language Models performance in competitive programming scenarios, offering an scalable framework for improving code generation in algorithmic problem-solving contexts.
#02Nov 6, 2026
cs.LG
Fifty-Two Shades of Pig: What the UCR Archive Really Asks Classifiers to Do
Omar Swelam, Jaris Küken, Shi Bin Hoo and 2 more
The pigs were bleeding. That was the point of the experiment: could airway pressure reveal hemorrhage before it became critical? In the UCR Time Series Classification Archive, the de facto benchmark for Time Series Classification (TSC), the same recordings ask a different question: "which of 52 pigs produced this trace?". The dataset PigAirwayPressure is not an outlier. Although the archive is the standard benchmark, whether its tasks resemble the problems TSC is meant to solve has rarely been examined. We find that several datasets are repurposed from their original task, built from toy setups, or have flawed test splits. We further question how representative the archive's ordered non-temporal sequences (e.g. spectra, shape outlines) are of real TSC, and the potential downsides from the decomposition of multivariate problems. Our findings call for more careful interpretation of archive-wide scores and greater attention to deployment-relevant evaluation. The audit is at https://github.com/automl/ucr-provenance-audit.
#03Nov 6, 2026
cs.LG
The Cost of Coverage: Conformalising Native Forecast Uncertainty for GB Wind Power
Carl Somers
Uncertainty bands on wind forecasts help inform reserve sizing and commitments, but often fail to deliver their stated coverage. We apply conformal prediction to native bands to see what it adds and what it costs, comparing six forecasters, from ARIMA to a tabular foundation model, at two wind farms in Great Britain (GB) under operational conditions. We show that calibration repairs empirical marginal coverage with little or no Winkler Score penalty, but this apparent success conceals under-coverage in high winds. Calibrating by forecast wind regime turns marginal coverage into regime-level coverage, cutting day-ahead out-of-band volume in high winds by over 40% relative to pooled calibration while narrowing bands overall.
#04Nov 6, 2026
cs.CL
ROSE: Risk-Aware Orthogonal Subspace Navigation for Lifelong Knowledge Editing in Multimodal Large Language Models
Lingyun Song, Ziyao Chen, Kang Pan and 5 more
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) require continuous factual updates to stay current, yet lifelong knowledge editing remains a daunting challenge. The primary obstacle is the severe Locality Erosion and Catastrophic Forgetting, where sequential edits inevitably interfere with pre-trained capabilities and prior updates. In this paper, we propose \textbf{ROSE}, a \textbf{R}isk-aware \textbf{O}rthogonal \textbf{S}ubspace navigation framework for lifelong knowledge \textbf{E}diting. ROSE addresses forgetting by aiming to restrict parameter updates to the orthogonal complement of previously edited subspaces. Crucially, it introduces a risk-guided mechanism that utilizes a dynamically computed risk mask to safeguard specific factual parameter subspaces essential for model stability. During inference, ROSE employs a multi-granularity knowledge integration strategy, featuring prototype-anchored semantic gating and perturbation-driven subspace fusion to precisely activate edited knowledge for relevant queries while limiting interference on unrelated inputs. Comprehensive experiments on two prominent multimodal benchmarks show that ROSE is competitive with state-of-the-art approaches across five key metrics, while maintaining outstanding stability over $1,000$ sequential updates. Our code is available at https://github.com/sunlitsong/ROSE.
#05Nov 6, 2026
cs.CL
Language as Trait, Politeness as Strategy: Controlled Tests of Linguistic Effects in LLM Social-Deduction Agents
Yuchen Li, Lisa Liu, Runqi Zou and 3 more
Large language model (LLM) agents coordinate through conversation, and the same message can be phrased in simpler or more complex language, bluntly or politely. We test whether such differences change how other agents judge and act, using the LURK Werewolf framework, which separates each utterance's speech-act predicate from its natural-language realization. We rewrite only the realization, check that the game content is preserved, and replay each game day from saved checkpoints against a re-sampled control. We vary linguistic range consistently across a speaker's messages and politeness strategy per utterance. Across 30 games and 4,335 replays, neither manipulation changes the trust other agents place in the speaker, and no effect on votes or night actions survives correction for multiple comparisons; the largest uncorrected effect is that shifting range away from a neutral paraphrase changes about 4 percentage points more of the other players' votes. In natural play, 88% of face-threatening speech is bald on-record regardless of role.