#01Jul 23, 2026
cs.CV
GraphVid: Interactive Graph-Controllable Video Generation
Vedant Shah, Onkar Susladkar, Tushar Prakash and 5 more
Controllable video generation remains challenging due to the difficulty of specifying precise multi-object interactions using text prompts or motion-control inputs that primarily constrain pixel movement. In practice, trajectory-based control often requires users to draw accurate tracks for multiple objects, which scales poorly with scene complexity and becomes ambiguous under occlusion or overlap. To enable flexible yet precise multi-subject control, we introduce $\textbf{GraphVid}$, a graph-conditioned image-to-video generation model that enables interactive control through structured interaction graphs. We further curate $\textbf{GraphVid-Bench}$, a large-scale interaction-centric video dataset with structured relational annotations to enable training of interaction-aware video generation models. Despite using substantially less training data and fewer trainable parameters than prior motion-control methods, GraphVid delivers strong controllability and video quality. Compared with Motion-I2V, GraphVid reduces FID by up to 39.9% and FVD by 37.6%, while improving PSNR (9.87=>15.98) and SSIM (0.38=>0.61). Our results highlight the potential of structured semantic interfaces as a powerful paradigm for controllable video generation.
#02Jul 23, 2026
cs.RO
Scale Up Strategically: Learning Compositional Generalization via Bias-Aware Evaluation and Data Collection for Robotic Manipulation
Yu Qi, Zhang Ye, Xinyi Xu and 6 more
Compositional generalization is essential for robot to follow diverse instructions. However, pretrained policies are known to take shortcuts, deferring to salient cues rather than grounding language. We introduce a diagnostic framework that localizes this failure to individual \textit{instruction factors}, \textit{e.g.,} reusable semantic components such as color, verb, object, size, and spatial attribute. Our framework formalizes instruction factor bias, the tendency of fine-tuned policies to over-rely on dominant factors as shortcuts, and quantifies it through two metrics: Factor Dominance Rate (FDR), capturing pairwise bias between factors, and Factor Dominance Hierarchy (FDH), aggregating these into a global ranking. Evaluation on six foundation policies reveals broadly consistent ordering, \textit{i.e.}, color $\geq$ object $\geq$ spatial $\geq$ verb $\geq$ size, with color dominant, and verb and size most under-grounded. We further show the diagnosis is actionable: a bias-aware data collection strategy that reallocates a fixed budget toward under-grounded factors outperforms baselines in simulation and on a real robot using half the demonstrations, thereby enabling more sample-efficient and generalizable policy learning.
#03Jul 23, 2026
cs.CL
Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)
Ryan Cotterell
Surprisal theory holds that the human processing difficulty of a linguistic unit in context is an affine function of its surprisal under some language model. I argue this claim is a tautology without further constraint: for any non-negative difficulty measure over units in context, there exists a language model whose surprisal is an affine function of it under mild technical conditions. Therefore, because any pattern of difficulty is consistent with some language model, without an additional constraint on the language model, surprisal theory makes no falsifiable predictions. The tautology was long obscured by an assumption implicit in two decades of psycholinguistic work---that the relevant language model is the distribution that generated the training corpus, so that improving corpus fit improves predictions of human behavior. Recent empirical work has undermined this assumption, demonstrating that better corpus models can be worse predictors of processing difficulty. I conclude that breaking the tautology requires a rationalist intervention, i.e., the relevant language model must be derived from a non-empirically motivated model of the comprehender, which could be based on, for instance, memory constraints or processing goals, and that, thus, does not depend on the behavioral data surprisal theory is meant to explain.
#04Jul 23, 2026
cs.AI
The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation
Fares Fourati, Hinrich Schütze, Eyke Hüllermeier and 1 more
The rapid progress of AI has intensified the long-standing pursuit of automation: replacing human participation with algorithms wherever possible. Implicit in this pursuit is the assumption that humans remain in the loop only because current AI systems are not yet sufficiently capable. This paper challenges that assumption. Rather than asking how far automation can extend, we ask where its conceptual limits lie and argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems for three distinct reasons. Technical or complementarity grounds arise when humans contribute capabilities or perspectives unavailable to AI. Normative or developmental grounds arise when participation itself is valuable for human agency or learning. Most importantly, emergence grounds arise from target emergence: in some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself. In these cases, human participation is not merely a means of improving execution but is constitutive of the target being produced. Human--AI co-construction, understood as the joint production of outcomes by humans and AI systems, is therefore not simply a temporary response to imperfect AI, but a persistent feature of activities whose objectives emerge through participation. This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation and for the design, evaluation, and ethics of future AI systems.
#05Jul 23, 2026
cs.AI
Unsupervised Consensus-Based Anomaly Detection for Spatiotemporal Malaria Incidence in Ghana
T. Ansah-Narh, Y. Asare Afrane
A consensus anomaly detection framework was applied to monthly malaria surveillance data from Ghana (2014-2023) to identify atypical transmission patterns. Anomalies were highly structured in space and time. Ashanti and Northern Regions accounted for most recurrent anomalies, with persistent hotspots at Tamale, Kumasi, and Accra. A key finding was the spatial distinction between anomaly burden (cumulative cases during anomalous periods) and anomaly frequency (persistence of unusual behaviour). Tamale had the highest burden during anomalies, whereas the highest anomaly rates clustered in Ashanti districts, showing that high-burden areas are not necessarily those with the most frequent anomalous transmission. Anomalous months formed a statistically distinct group, with much higher case counts (Cohen's $d = 3.252$) and large seasonal deviations ($d > 1.2$) compared with normal months. Malaria burden alone provides an incomplete picture of transmission dynamics. By distinguishing where malaria is most prevalent from where transmission behaves most unusually, this framework can strengthen surveillance, prioritise investigations, and support targeted control strategies.