#01Aug 27, 2026
cs.CL
Puro-2B: Poor Lab's Qwen2-1.5B Trained on RTX 5090 within $5090
Kairong Luo, Jiarui Cui, Yaorui Yin and 8 more
Language model pretraining has become almost synonymous with prohibitive cost, placing it out of reach for much of the academic and open-source communities. Although strong open-source efforts already exist, including open-weight models and open-source training recipes, a cost-efficient, hardware-accessible, and open-source pretraining recipe has long been missing. Even at a small scale, training Llama-3.2-3B costs over \$1.5M, and reproducing SmolLM3-3B needs over \$700K. In this report, we present an open pretraining recipe designed to lower this barrier. Using this recipe, we train a collection of Puro-2B models from scratch on up to 1.4 trillion tokens with FP8 precision on consumer-grade RTX 5090 GPUs. The models in the collection differ in token budgets and selected recipe variants. Our best model is trained at a compute cost of less than \$6.9K and approaches Qwen2.5-1.5B performance under our evaluation protocol. This cost efficiency is enabled by a combination of approaches, including hardware selection, low-precision training, hyperball optimization, curriculum model averaging, and the data recipe. Beyond the recipe itself, we provide two additional results. First, across the Puro-2B collection, we derive a Puro Cost Scaling Law that relates training cost to average model performance; the fitted law suggests that about \$4.4K, less than \$5,090, is sufficient to reach the performance of Qwen2-1.5B. Second, as an end-to-end case study, we examine how pretraining data curricula shape downstream performance after post-training. Such controlled studies are enabled by having access to the full pretraining pipeline rather than model weights alone. We release the full training recipe for Puro-2B, including data, code, and model weights under Apache 2.0 at https://huggingface.co/collections/thu-pacman/puro-2b.
#02Aug 27, 2026
cs.AI
Learning a Continuous Sepsis Severity Score Without Hour-by-Hour Supervision: A Two-Site Retrospective Study
Kevin Zhu, Ryan Zhang, Baraa Abed and 18 more
Currently used sepsis severity indices rely on fixed variables and weights established decades ago, which are coarsely discretized and calibrated to a cohort that no longer reflects contemporary critical care. No alternative learned directly from patient trajectories is in routine use. We conducted a retrospective two-cohort study on a total of 29,116 and 7,691 adult patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria from two hospital systems in Massachusetts and Georgie, respectively. We developed a sepsis index using 43 routinely charted variables over a 72-hour treatment window. Unlike previous studies, we use mortality as a treatment-level ranking signal rather than a per-state target, allowing credit to be redistributed non-uniformly across timesteps. Evaluation was done on a permanent 20% test holdout, using clinical vignettes and Spearman correlation. Uncertainty intervals were obtained by bootstrap resampling of whole patients. Under this ranking scheme, non-survivors scored 1.19-1.64 points higher than survivors on a 0-10 scale within all strata of baseline SOFA-2, with similar results stratifying within lactate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and creatinine. Within-patient change in the index correlated with change in lactate (Spearman rho = 0.39; n = 1,854). Similar, weaker correlations were found for MAP and creatinine. On a cohort level, cross-institutional agreement measured by Spearman correlation between models trained on different sites, were 70-77% of same-site correlation. External within-patient correlations were 0.54 and 0.59 against ceilings of 0.92 and 0.90. Our index also correlated with established indices, while null controls stayed near zero. Our index demonstrated hourly prognostic information that meaningfully separates patient outcomes and is consistent with clinical expectation, indicating potential as a decision support tool complementing clinical judgement.
#03Aug 27, 2026
cs.IR
Stageboost: Recommending Signals Based on Counterfactual Estimation
Darpan Singhal, Matan Mandelbrod, Tal Franji and 3 more
Signals are short textual or visual snippets displayed on the eBay View-Item (VI) page, providing additional, contextual information for users about the viewed item. The aim of displaying these signals is to facilitate intelligent purchase and to incentivize engagement. In this paper, we present a 2 stage xgboost based model that optimally populates the VI page with signals. This approach has shown a 0.08% lift in overall GMB (Gross Merchandise Bought) and 0.58% increase in Parts and Accessories GMB, primarily due to increase in conversion of high average price items in online experimentation.
#04Aug 27, 2026
cs.CV
KnockGS:interaction-Grounded Calibrationof Physical Gaussian Representations
Chenchen Ge, Hanwen Shen, Bowen Jing and 6 more
Physics-integrated 3D Gaussian representations now allow reconstructed deformable objects to be simulated and rendered under explicit material models. Existing pipelines, however, assume that material parameters are known or manually specified, limiting their applicability when these parameters must be inferred from observed object dynamics. We propose KnockGS, an interaction-response PhysicalGS framework that estimates the elasticity and density scales of a 3D Gaussian object from its dynamics under a known applied force. Rather than treating physical simulation only as a forward process, we turn the force-induced response into a calibration signal: temporal response features are xtracted from the observed dynamics, the two material scales are estimated from those features, and the estimate is then frozen and written back into the same simulator so that it can be tested on an interaction it was never fitted to.We evaluate the framework on both parameter recovery and response-level fidelity. The estimated scales are compared against hidden ground truth, and the re-simulated object is measured against the target using 3D particle trajectories, response-curve statistics, and rendered-frame quality. Across five held-out material targets, our method recovers the scales substantially more accurately than response retrieval, global regression, or a fixed default material, and the frozen estimate remains predictive under interactions that differ in direction and in magnitude. Interaction response therefore carries enough information to calibrate material scales in physically grounded 3D Gaussian representations.Our study is a first step toward interactive PhysicalGS systems that calibrate a Gaussian asset whose rendered appearance and simulated response are consistent.
#05Aug 27, 2026
cs.CL
Consolidating RLVR Capabilities Across Domains: A Deep Dive into Fusion Paradigms
Siye Wu, Kai Yang, Yuchen Cai and 8 more
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves specific capabilities of large language models, but covering multiple capabilities often involves training separate domain experts and subsequently consolidating them. We organize three fusion paradigms by the artefacts they reuse: Merge combines expert task vectors, Mix RL pools their datasets, and multi-teacher on-policy distillation (MOPD) uses both. Because they have largely been studied in isolation, how they compare and how to choose among them remain unclear. We compare all three using shared experts and data across model scales and a multi-domain benchmark suite. Although their average performance differs by at most 1.4 points, the gap reaches 8.6 points on a single benchmark, with domain-level variation tracking cross-domain relations visible in task-vector geometry. Training dynamics expose distinct constraints: Mix RL depends on domain mixture proportions, MOPD remains bounded by its teachers, and Merge compresses all expert updates into one. All three improve single-sample accuracy without measurable gains in solution coverage or losses in held-out capabilities. These results yield a practical guideline: use Merge when experts already exist and cheap fusion is paramount; Mix RL when training a unified model without experts, with domain proportions adjusted for cross-domain transfer; and MOPD when preserving domain-specific gains matters more than surpassing teachers or minimizing end-to-end cost.