ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 5, 2026

stat.ME

Changepoint localization via nested exchangeability tests: from point estimates to confidence intervals

Rohan Hore, Aaditya Ramdas

We study distribution-free uncertainty quantification for a changepoint estimate in an offline setting. We observe a sequence with a single changepoint and are given an estimate of its location. The pre- and post-change segments are independent and each consists of i.i.d. (or, more generally, exchangeable) observations from arbitrary and unknown distributions. We introduce Changepoint LOcalization via Nested Exchangeability testing (CLONE), a novel method for constructing distribution-free confidence intervals around that estimate by testing exchangeability in nested windows centered at the reference estimate. Under these assumptions, CLONE provides finite-sample coverage for any black-box reference estimator. Using a geometrically shrinking radius grid, CLONE requires only $O(log n)$ permutation tests. We characterize optimal scores for the framework and provide practical recommendations that result in sharp confidence intervals. Under mild assumptions, CLONE confidence intervals have asymptotically vanishing normalized length. Simulations and experiments on image and text data support our theoretical findings.

#02Nov 5, 2026

cs.CV

FreePath: Neural Mean Free Path for Image Dehazing

Rongrong Gao, Jingxuan Feng, Wenyu Xu

Single image dehazing requires recovering scene radiance from visual responses that are weakened and veiled by participating media. Existing methods either invert explicit scattering variables, which can be unstable under complex scenes, or learn direct restoration mappings, which often discard the physical organization of haze formation. We present \emph{FreePath}, a neural mean free path framework for image dehazing. Instead of estimating atmospheric parameters, FreePath represents dehazing as feature space path state restoration, inspired by the expected distance a visual response can propagate before interacting with haze. Within a residual encoder and decoder, the Mean Free Path Residual Block learns path and collision fields to guide haze constrained correction, while FreePath State Conservation Integration preserves restored path states during deep feature aggregation. Experiments on paired CDD-11 haze images and real RTTS scenes show that FreePath consistently improves full reference fidelity, no reference perceptual quality, and visual faithfulness over representative dehazing baselines.

#03Nov 5, 2026

cs.CV

MIKU: Material Invariance and Knowledge Unification for PBR Generation

Yajie Bao, Jiaye Fu, Youtian Lin and 5 more

High-quality material generation for physically based rendering (PBR) remains challenging because datasets and synthesis pipelines lack standardized representations. Differences in material definitions, rendering conventions, and parameterizations lead to unstable and physically implausible results. We propose MIKU, a unified framework for standardized PBR asset representation and physically consistent material generation across diverse 3D content domains. Its core is a unified processing pipeline that standardizes the workflow from data preprocessing to final texture synthesis, maintaining consistent geometry and texture representations. A normalization scheme harmonizes heterogeneous material parameterizations in a common representation space, enabling robust cross-dataset training and inference. Building on this formulation, we train a novel physically aware diffusion model for PBR texture generation within a two-stage multi-view synthesis framework. First, geometry-aware albedo generation synthesizes multi-view albedo maps under explicit geometric guidance to ensure cross-view appearance consistency. Second, metallic-roughness generation uses the diffusion model to predict physically plausible roughness and metallic maps conditioned on the generated albedo and unified representation. Trained end-to-end on standardized data, the model learns to generate materials that respect category-level material priors and semantic part boundaries. By decoupling representation standardization from appearance synthesis, MIKU substantially improves material generation stability and physical consistency. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art texture quality and semantic consistency across object parts, advancing automated material generation for 3D content creation.

#04Nov 5, 2026

cs.CV

Where Do Reported Long-Video QA Gains Come From? A Controlled Audit of Frame Selection, Evidence Injection, and Expert Routing

Shih-Yao Lin

Long-video question answering is usually studied as frame selection: which few frames should a vision-language model see? We introduce VideoRouteAudit, a controlled audit that separates this choice from two alternatives, injecting non-visual evidence and routing to another answering model. It holds the backbone, frame budget, decoding, prompt and grader fixed while varying one decision at a time. On the full Video-MME long bucket (n=900, K=8), no tested selector significantly improves over uniform sampling. The largest selection-only estimate is +1.9 pt (95% CI [-1.2,+5.0]) and our cascade is +1.2 pt [-1.7,+4.1]; all are equivalent to uniform within +/-5 pt. The same contrasts are unstable at the n=200 subset scale commonly used: three of four are up to 3.8x larger, one reverses sign, and resampled 200-item subsets reverse the full-bucket effect's sign in 35.8% of draws. The audit also corrects our own first results. The anomaly-domain "+ASR" arms injected no text, so the pooled +4.7 pt gain was selection plus a development prefix. With transcripts, ASR lowers XD-Violence accuracy by 10.0 pt when appended after the question and not at all when placed before it, and lowers UCF-Crime by 13.0 pt either way; on Video-MME, placing it first adds about 4 pt (7 on Qwen2-VL) to uniform sampling and to the cascade alike (post hoc, unadjusted). Swapping the answering model gives the largest contrast (+15.1 pt on MUSIC-AVQA, +33.3 pt on its worst type), but the same audio-visual expert with its soundtrack silenced keeps 92% of the gain (69% with a mismatched soundtrack), so the contrast is mostly a model swap. Code, per-item predictions and scripts that recompute every statistic are available at https://github.com/mikeslin-ir/long-video-qa-audit.

#05Nov 5, 2026

cs.LG

Adversarial Multiplicity: Cherry-Picked Models and the Limits of Disclosure

Cassandra C. Chou, Benjamin Q. Huynh, Allison Koenecke and 1 more

Predictive multiplicity -- where similarly accurate models disagree on individual predictions -- can be leveraged to optimize secondary metrics (e.g., fairness) without loss in predictive performance. However, exploiting multiplicity opens the opportunity for motivated parties (or coding agents gaming their objectives) to steer predictions toward their own ends, such as in litigation or consumer disputes with automated decision-making tools. In these adversarial multiplicity settings, we distinguish soft manipulation, where parties optimize over innocuous model choices (e.g., hyperparameter tuning, feature engineering), from hard manipulation, where parties directly perturb model parameters. We find a sufficiently flexible model can be manipulated to reverse any individual prediction with minimal change in predictive performance while passing black-box audits, making hard manipulation viable in most regulatory settings. Soft manipulation has smaller effects but can pass white-box audits requiring full access to code and data. Even aggregate estimates can be manipulated: a model's estimated effect of climate change on wildfires can be fully reversed by hard edits and soft search. We find the Reconcile algorithm typically resolves most disagreements between models, but more often in favor of the manipulator when the opposing model is chosen adversarially compared to at random. We map which manipulations can plausibly pass existing regulations and disclosure policies, and recommend mitigations such as pre-registration, proof of model training, sensitivity analyses, multi-metric evaluations, and committing to versioned public models.