#01Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Leaf Values as Coordinates: Exact Contrastive Explanation for Gradient-Boosted Ensembles
Emanuele Luzio
A gradient-boosted ensemble predicts by summing one leaf value per tree. Read those values as coordinates rather than as intermediate results, and every instance becomes a point in R^M on which the model acts linearly: the score is the sum of the coordinates. This small change of view makes contrastive explanation exact. The difference between two instances is a vector that is identically zero wherever they share a leaf, so the gap between a rejected applicant and an accepted one is carried by a handful of coordinates, each traceable to a real split in a real tree. Nothing is fitted, sampled, or assumed additive in features -- the additivity is already there, in the right space. We build a recourse method on this representation and evaluate it on five tabular datasets under repeated cross-validation. Its recommendation reconstructs the model's own decision to 6.2 x 10^-15, so an auditor can re-check the arithmetic without the model. On the credit datasets it is Pareto-non-dominated on effort against realism. And when recommendations are restricted to changes the subject could actually make -- not their age, not a settled delinquency -- it retains 58% of its validity where the strongest baseline retains 41%, a distinction the standard evaluation cannot see because it never asks whether a recommendation can be carried out.
#02Aug 19, 2026
cs.AI
Tuning the Stochastic Machine: A Systems Engineer's Operating Model for Human-AI Engineering
George Andrikopoulos
When an expert corrects an LLM assistant's error, the correction usually dies with the session, and the error class returns. I argue this is an operations problem, not a tooling problem: mechanisms for persisting corrections exist and are shipping, but the discipline for governing them -- versioning with provenance, recurrence monitoring, counter-metrics, retirement of stale rules -- does not. Writing as a systems engineer of thirty years, I map the LLM stack onto the machines my profession already operates (frozen silicon, firmware, loadable modules, persistent configuration, volatile memory), identify where the mapping fails (stochastic generation, configuration that binds only probabilistically, no general-purpose retirement (verification) stage by default), and derive from the failures a seven-principle operating discipline with an error loop at its core. Three cases from my own practice illustrate the mechanism, among them a control that silently became the exact harm it was built to prevent. I close with the measurement framework this view implies and the lab study required to test it.
#03Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning for Controlled Hawkes Jump-Diffusions
Tomasz R. Bielecki, Thibaut Mastrolia, Haoze Yan
We study stochastic control of multivariate Hawkes-driven stochastic differential equations with machine learning algorithms in a non-Markovian setting. Due to the path dependence of the memory of the Hawkes intensity, this problem does not fall within classical stochastic control theory outside particular Markovian kernels. We first develop a finite-dimensional Markovianization procedure and algorithm to approximate multivariate Hawkes processes with mixtures of exponential kernels. We prove the convergence of the Markovianized approximation of the Hawkes process, its intensity, and the value of the problem to the original non-Markovian processes and the value of the primal problem. We then formulate continuous-time deterministic policy gradient learning on the Markovianized approximation of the problem, called Hawkes-CT DDPG. We propose a model-free algorithm to solve the non-Markovian Hawkes-driven optimization by observing only the event times of the process, the realization of the solution to the SDE, and a chosen set of decay filters, while the Hawkes kernel coefficients remain unknown. We compare our continuous time reinforcement learning Hawkes-CT DDPG method with discrete time reinforcement learning techniques under three different types of kernels: simple exponential, Erlang, and power-law kernels.
#04Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Open-MOPD: Diagnosing and Fixing Capability Imbalance in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation
Huan-ang Gao, Haohan Chi, Yong Yan and 7 more
Multi-teacher on-policy distillation (M-OPD) has emerged as a promising paradigm for consolidating domain-specialized reinforcement learning (RL) experts into a single generalist student via dense, token-level reward supervision. Despite its practical success, the optimization dynamics governing multi-teacher capability integration remain poorly understood, and open, rigorously reproducible recipes are conspicuously lacking. In this work, we establish a controlled M-OPD benchmark on SmolLM3-3B-Base with oracle routing, isolating capability integration from routing ambiguity. Our investigation reveals a pronounced capability integration gap: standard M-OPD captures only 35.6% of the available headroom relative to a domain-routed oracle ensemble, with concise tasks such as instruction following suffering severe degradation and premature stagnation. Crucially, we show that this failure stems not from gradient conflict, but from a severe misallocation of the token-level optimization budget. This pathology is driven by three orthogonal factors: structural sequence-length disparities across domains, dynamic convergence drift due to non-uniform learning rates, and multi-step reward staleness from asynchronous policy updates. To resolve these imbalances, we introduce Open-MOPD, a principled framework incorporating token-share balancing, gap-aware dynamic budget allocation, and student reward refresh. Together, these mechanisms systematically restore cross-domain balance, elevating headroom recovery from 35.6% to 83.4% in a single deployable student. We fully open-source our end-to-end post-training recipe, training trajectories, and evaluation suites on an academically accessible hardware budget.
#05Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Pretraining Reusable Inference Across Views with Synthetic Task Priors
Jielong Lu, Zhihao Wu, Jiajun Yu and 2 more
Modern pretrained encoders make representations from heterogeneous views increasingly reusable, but the procedure that determines view utility and combines evidence is still relearned for each downstream task. Consequently, knowledge about view relevance, complementarity, reliability, and missingness is repeatedly discarded rather than transferred across tasks. We therefore reformulate multi-view learning as learning a reusable, task-conditioned inference procedure rather than a fixed fusion function. Based on this perspective, we propose SIMPLE, a prior-fitted multi-view in-context learner that predicts query labels by conditioning on a small labeled support set. Since existing real-world datasets cover only a limited range of view configurations and task structures, we construct a controllable synthetic task prior in embedding space. It generates diverse support-query episodes with varying class structures, shared and view-specific factors, representation geometries, cross-view dependencies, reliability levels, missingness patterns, and distribution shifts. A hierarchical inference architecture then performs reasoning within views, across views, and across support and query samples. Experiments on multi-view and multi-omics benchmarks demonstrate that the frozen variant of SIMPLE achieves competitive performance without updating the inference backbone, while lightweight adapter calibration attains leading performance on most evaluated datasets. Together, the results under frozen, one-shot, and missing-view settings support the central hypothesis that multi-view reasoning itself can be pretrained and reused, while lightweight adapter calibration provides task-specific alignment when needed.