#01Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Enhancing EBSD throughput of battery electrode materials using super-resolution generative adversarial networks
John Mangum, Andrew Glaws, Francois Usseglio-Viretta and 2 more
Quantitative microstructural characterization of Li-ion battery electrode materials using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) has been proven as a critical method for optimizing cell performance. However, the inherently slow nature of EBSD can hinder the throughput of analyses needed for statistical representation of a material microstructure being developed. This work demonstrates a machine learning super-resolution framework using a generative adversarial network (SRGAN) to significantly increase EBSD throughput. The SRGAN model was trained on EBSD data of LiNixMnyCozO2 (NMC) cathode particles to computationally enhance low-resolution datasets and its performance is compared against classical interpolation methods across various upscaling factors (2x to 12x). Both qualitative image metrics and quantitative microstructural analysis verified that the SRGAN systematically outperformed classical methods, particularly in preserving small grains and maintaining realistic grain boundaries. We demonstrate that a 5x upscaling factor, corresponding to a 25x speed-up in acquisition time or a 25x larger field of view, is practical while maintaining acceptable accuracy in key metrics like grain size and shape. For instance, at 5x upscaling, relative errors were +5.7%, +8.2%, and -14.6% on grain area-equivalent diameter, grain maximum sphere-inscribed diameter, and grain boundary length, respectively. The SRGAN methodology developed in this work significantly enhances the efficiency of EBSD acquisition for more statistically robust microstructural dataset, enabling EBSD as a high-throughput characterization tool for materials research and industrial process development.
#02Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Beyond Teacher Likelihood: Group-Calibrated On-Policy Distillation for Long-Context Reasoning
Zhu Zhang, Jixun Wang, Xiaoang Xu and 6 more
On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own responses using dense token-level guidance from a stronger teacher. In long-context tasks, however, token-level teacher support can favor locally plausible responses that omit evidence distributed across the input or violate global task constraints. Task-specific verifiers, in contrast, evaluate task completion at the response level and may return graded rewards that reflect partial success. We diagnose this mismatch on fixed responses from two representative long-context evidence-aggregation tasks. Across longer input ranges, trajectory-level OPD scores become progressively less aligned with verifier rewards, indicating teacher-verifier disagreement. Motivated by this observation, we introduce Group-Calibrated On-Policy Distillation (GC-OPD). GC-OPD separately normalizes verifier rewards and trajectory-level OPD scores within each rollout group and uses their difference as a signed teacher-verifier disagreement residual. Relative-advantage-based credit assignment (RACA) distributes this trajectory-level residual across tokens according to their relative OPD advantages while preserving the original OPD signal. Across five long-context benchmarks, post-training with GC-OPD raises the five-benchmark averages of the official Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B checkpoints from 29.08 to 40.47 and from 35.12 to 44.65, respectively. Vanilla OPD reaches 39.31 and 43.56 under the same setup. Controlled ablations show that the signed residual is more effective than either an additional OPD-derived term or direct group-normalized verifier reward addition, while RACA further improves over uniform token allocation. Together, these results demonstrate that group-relative residual calibration can incorporate verifier outcomes without discarding dense token-level guidance. Code is available at https://github.com/SolereZhang/GC-OPD.
#03Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Beyond Trial Averaging: Anchoring Neural and Visual Representations for Few-Repetition Brain-to-Image Retrieval
Zhenyao Cui, Siyuan Kan, Dingkun Liu and 1 more
Decoding visual information from brain signals probes neural representations and enables neuro-rehabilitation and dream decoding. Recent brain-to-image retrieval approaches have achieved promising performance, typically by averaging many (up to 80) neural trials per image, requiring repeated stimulus presentation that increases latency, cost, and user burden. When only one or a few repetitions are available, the retrieval accuracy drops sharply. This drop is commonly attributed to query noise because averaging suppresses noise and increases signal stability. However, we find a non-transitive alignment pattern: the low-repetition query signal and the image representation each align with the high-repetition center, but not directly with each other. This pattern shows that query noise is only part of the problem and that gallery placement also affects retrieval. We therefore propose a neural-anchor-based retrieval (NEAR) framework that treats the high-repetition center as an anchor and approaches it from both sides: a denoiser pulls the noisy query toward the true anchor, and a small network predicts each candidate's pseudo anchor from its image and pulls the image toward it. Across four datasets spanning EEG, MEG and fMRI, NEAR consistently improved retrieval in the few-repetition regime. On THINGS-EEG2, it improved 200-way Top-1 accuracy by 5.7 and 9.3 percentage points respectively, when averaging one and four repetitions. By anchoring neural and visual representations, NEAR reduces reliance on repeated acquisition and brings neural retrieval closer to real-world deployment.
#04Aug 19, 2026
physics.ao-ph
Interpretable AI predicts a 2026 summer dry anomaly in central China
Anran Wang, Wen Shi, Yong Luo and 5 more
Seasonal precipitation anomalies are largely regulated by atmospheric circulation, which dynamical models predict with greater reliability than precipitation itself. Here, we employ a deep learning model that translates dynamical circulation predictions into precipitation estimates. Predictions initialized from March to May consistently indicate a dry anomaly over central China in summer 2026. Retrospective evaluations revealed higher predictive skill in the analogue years, which also tended to feature central equatorial Pacific warming persisting from the preceding winter into summer. This warming favors an anomalous cyclonic circulation over the western North Pacific-South China Sea-South China region, which induces northerly winds and moisture divergence that jointly suppress rainfall over central China. Supporting this mechanism, layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) independently identifies these northerly winds as the dominant driver of the prediction among all model inputs. Perturbation tests supported this attribution: removing LRP-identified features effectively eliminates the dry anomaly. Our framework thus provides physically interpretable explanations for AI-derived regional climate projections, facilitating evidence-based assessment before observational data become available.
#05Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Learned, Then Lost: A Measured Single-Example Counterfactual in Pre-training
Zachary Speck, Asa Shepard
A single training example's contribution to a finished model is normally estimated rather than measured, because measuring it takes two expensive full pre-training runs that differ in one row of one batch. We ran that counterfactual 24 times at a small scale. We trained 32 GPT-2 models at 124M parameters from scratch on OpenWebText, over four conditions and eight seeds. At step 200 of 9,536, at peak learning rate, we replaced one row of a 256-row batch with a fixed context injection carrying a 194-token passage. The three injected conditions are: 1. fluent prose with a corpus-attested subject, 2. fluent prose with a fabricated subject matched to it within 0.14% on full-batch gradient delta, and 3. random keyboard characters. The fourth condition is an uninjected twin. The passage is learned from one exposure and then decays. Fifty steps after injection, the arm that saw a passage predicts it better than the arm that did not by 0.039 and 0.044 nats of cross-entropy on the passage, at eight of eight seeds with p < $10^{-4}$. At the final step we do not detect that difference for either passage, at p = 0.25 and p = 0.71, against minimum detectable effects of 0.025 and 0.079 nats, nor between the two passages, at p=0.54. Every geometric measure we report is taken after that decay. Our pre-registered contrast on interpolation loss barrier is +0.0068 with p = 0.509, against a minimum detectable effect of 0.032 barrier units. Held-out cross-entropy is $-0.00044$ with p = 0.310. Per-layer centered kernel alignment does not detectably separate any condition at any layer. Weight displacement reaches 44.1% of the seed-to-seed Euclidean distance and is 92% settled by the midpoint of training, while the barrier reaches 3.0% of the seed-to-seed barrier. Those two figures sit roughly 15 times apart, and that is a lower bound. The injection relocates the model within its basin without moving it out.