#01Aug 19, 2026
cs.RO
ADEPT: Accelerating Dexterity via Pre-Training and Post-Training using Reinforcement Learning
Jayjun Lee, Jessica Yin, Asif Rana and 7 more
We introduce Accelerating Dexterity via Pre-Training (ADEPT), a large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) framework for learning sim-to-real transferable dexterity across high degree-of-freedom (DoF) robot embodiments that can solve long-horizon tasks directly from raw visuo-tactile perception. ADEPT pretrains a dexterous policy on a generic object reposing task, then post-trains downstream policies with this pretrained behavior as a prior. ADEPT enables learning new behaviors that are otherwise difficult to discover from scratch on multi-fingered robots and avoids learning the same set of skills over again for every new downstream task. The pretrained policy zero-shots the reposing phase of downstream tasks, but naïve RL fine-tuning rapidly degrades this capability during transfer. We address this with a stable post-training recipe combining behavior-cloning distillation, critic warm-up, and conservative on-policy updates. To safely exploit the full kinematic dexterity, we introduce a joint-space Geometric Fabric that mediates between the RL policy and the robot. We distill post-trained teachers into perceptive students that zero-shot sim-to-real transfer on two embodiments: a 23 DoF Kuka-Allegro with two RGB cameras, and a 29 DoF Flexiv-Sharpa with two RGB cameras and five vision-based tactile sensors, and can solve long-horizon tasks from challenging initial states with dexterity at human-level speed.
#02Aug 19, 2026
cs.LG
Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning for Controlled Hawkes Jump-Diffusions
Tomasz R. Bielecki, Thibaut Mastrolia, Haoze Yan
We study stochastic control of multivariate Hawkes-driven stochastic differential equations with machine learning algorithms in a non-Markovian setting. Due to the path dependence of the memory of the Hawkes intensity, this problem does not fall within classical stochastic control theory outside particular Markovian kernels. We first develop a finite-dimensional Markovianization procedure and algorithm to approximate multivariate Hawkes processes with mixtures of exponential kernels. We prove the convergence of the Markovianized approximation of the Hawkes process, its intensity, and the value of the problem to the original non-Markovian processes and the value of the primal problem. We then formulate continuous-time deterministic policy gradient learning on the Markovianized approximation of the problem, called Hawkes-CT DDPG. We propose a model-free algorithm to solve the non-Markovian Hawkes-driven optimization by observing only the event times of the process, the realization of the solution to the SDE, and a chosen set of decay filters, while the Hawkes kernel coefficients remain unknown. We compare our continuous time reinforcement learning Hawkes-CT DDPG method with discrete time reinforcement learning techniques under three different types of kernels: simple exponential, Erlang, and power-law kernels.
#03Aug 19, 2026
stat.ML
Learning Random Geometric Graphs Drawn in Probabilistic Metric Spaces
Dalia Chakrabarty, Kangrui Wang, Chuqiao Zhang and 1 more
We present a new data-driven learning of a Random Geometric Graph (RGG) of a multivariate dataset, where the graph is drawn in a probabilistic metric space. This graph learning works for generic datasets, irrespective of the type of the observables; their probability distributions; or size of the data. We identify a metric of the space that the graph is drawn in, as a probability distribution of a random variable that we introduce, namely, a variable that represents the disparity between the connectedness of two vertices of the graph, and the correlation between the two random variables that are attached to the respective vertex. It is the closed-form {\it{cdf}} of this disparity variable that we advance as the distance function of the host space of the learnt RGG, such that the edge exists between any two nodes, if this inter-nodal distance falls short of a chosen cutoff probability. Drawing the RGG in this probabilistic space leads to the graph being an Soft RGG, such that any edge - if it exists - exists with an identified probability. We forward a simple Rejection Sampling-based technique for learning the probability of any edge. The expected degree distribution of a vertex of this RGG is identified as local, and dependent on the inter-observable correlation matrix. If said correlation matrix is not known, it can be learnt given the data, using its closed-form posterior probability density function, that we forward. We illustrate our graph learning method by learning multiple RGGs of highly multivariate real datasets.
#04Aug 19, 2026
cs.AI
Tuning the Stochastic Machine: A Systems Engineer's Operating Model for Human-AI Engineering
George Andrikopoulos
When an expert corrects an LLM assistant's error, the correction usually dies with the session, and the error class returns. I argue this is an operations problem, not a tooling problem: mechanisms for persisting corrections exist and are shipping, but the discipline for governing them -- versioning with provenance, recurrence monitoring, counter-metrics, retirement of stale rules -- does not. Writing as a systems engineer of thirty years, I map the LLM stack onto the machines my profession already operates (frozen silicon, firmware, loadable modules, persistent configuration, volatile memory), identify where the mapping fails (stochastic generation, configuration that binds only probabilistically, no general-purpose retirement (verification) stage by default), and derive from the failures a seven-principle operating discipline with an error loop at its core. Three cases from my own practice illustrate the mechanism, among them a control that silently became the exact harm it was built to prevent. I close with the measurement framework this view implies and the lab study required to test it.
#05Aug 19, 2026
cs.AI
Grouping the Stochastic Machine: Precision, Not Capability, as the Frontier Metric for AI Systems
George Andrikopoulos
Frontier language models are compared, marketed, and benchmarked on capability -- what their best or average output can achieve. I argue this measures the wrong axis. The models have saturated accuracy: their mean output lands on the target. What now separates one system from another in practice is precision: how tightly concentrated their outputs are around that target across repeated, identical requests. Borrowing the marksman's distinction, capability is where the average shot lands; reliability is the size of the group. I make three claims. First, precision, not capability, is the frontier differentiator between systems, and benchmark culture systematically fails to measure it, reporting central tendency rather than spread. Second, precision is measurable, cheaply and without circularity, by running a fixed suite of deterministically scored tasks many times at fixed temperature and computing the per-task consistency of outcomes -- no model-in-the-loop grader required. Third, the measurement is not merely descriptive but decision-guiding: it separates consistent failures (a tight group off-centre, correctable by the operating discipline of Paper 1 -- a sight adjustment) from scattered failures (a wide group, correctable only by changing the model or its sampling -- a rifle problem). I define a grouping metric, specify a harness, and show how tracking a human-AI pair's grouping over time yields the compounding signal that Paper 1's field study requires. A first real run, since replicated, illustrates both the method and its most important limit: one measured gap was closed completely by a single rule (0/5 -> 5/5), while a suite of tasks authored from the rules themselves found no value, because a frontier model already embodies explicit good practice -- establishing that a discipline's worth is found by measurement on real work, not constructed from its own rulebook.