ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Nov 5, 2026

cs.LG

CoRD: Coupled Rollouts Fill the Blind Spot of On-Policy Distillation

Guhan Chen, Bohan Li, Jun Rao and 8 more

On-policy distillation trains a student on its own rollouts, so states the teacher would reach but the student does not are seldom supervised. We introduce CoRD (coupled-rollout distillation), which keeps the on-policy loss and moves only the distribution of training states toward the teacher, drawing rollouts from a geometric interpolation of student and teacher through the maximal coupling of speculative decoding. The coupling keeps the student's token wherever the two distributions agree and otherwise substitutes a token from the part of the target the student underweights, so interventions are as rare as any exact sampler allows and recede as the student learns. Across six base students from two model families (Qwen3 and Qwen3.5, 0.6B to 4B), CoRD raises average pass@1 over on-policy distillation by 0.9 to 2.0 points and pass@8 by 1.2 to 3.4 points on five public math benchmarks at equal steps and data. On frozen teacher-reached states, a 4B student trained with CoRD reaches in 16 steps a gap closure that on-policy distillation does not reach in 80, and substitution rules intervening at least as often in other directions fall short of CoRD.

#02Nov 5, 2026

cs.LG

The Blindfolded Controller: Decision Model-Guided Training for Reinforcement Learning

Muhammad Ibrahim Khan, Aniket Dixit, Faizan Ahmed and 1 more

Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a framework for continuous improvement through interaction with an environment. However, RL agents struggle against tasks that offer exploration challenges and sparse rewards, because learning efficient policies from scratch is slow and sample-inefficient. In contrast, decision models (DMs), given a description of the environment and task, can perform well in sparse-reward tasks, but, as they do not learn from reward, they are not able to improve towards the optimal solution. In this paper, we present Decision Model-Guided Training (DMGT), a technique that uses a DM with a description of the environment and task to initialise an RL policy, combining the DM's ability to act without training with RL's ability to improve from reward. Instead of exploring from scratch, the agent reaches the goal and receives reward from its first episodes, and RL then improves its policy beyond what the DM achieves. We demonstrate through experiments on seven tasks that our approach outperforms RL in all seven and DM in five. In addition, we provide comprehensive guidelines, derived from ablation studies, for describing an environment and task to a DM.

#03Nov 5, 2026

cs.LG

Flux as a Codec: Zero-Shot Lossy Compression with Flux

Fuma Kimishima, Jinjia Zhou

We propose FluxC, a zero-shot codec that uses Flux as a compression prior. Although DiffC has shown that pretrained diffusion models can serve as zero-shot codecs, we ask how the choice of coding path and reconstruction method affects rate--distortion--perception behavior. We analyze FluxC along three axes: coding cost and bit allocation, reconstruction method, and low rate distortion. At matched signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), we show that the path choice does not affect the ideal information rate, but changes how bits are allocated across time steps. For reconstruction, we compare ancestral sampling, one-step ODE reconstruction, and many-step ODE reconstruction. Our analysis shows that ODE-based reconstruction can achieve lower distortion than ancestral sampling, especially in the low rate regime. Experiments on Gaussian sources and natural images support this prediction. Moreover, FluxC performs competitively with, and in some cases outperforms, recent neural image compression methods, suggesting that Flux can serve as a principled zero-shot codec.

#04Nov 5, 2026

stat.ML

Joint Modeling of Conditional Mean and Variability in Multilevel Functional Data: Application to Postprandial Glucose Trajectories in the AEGIS Study

Yang Xiao, Francisco Gude, Marcos Matabuena

Functional data analysis provides a framework for studying time-varying associations between covariates and high-frequency biological signals. In digital health, participants often contribute repeated functional trajectories, yet existing multilevel regression methods largely focus on the conditional mean, overlooking variability and its role in biological heterogeneity. We propose a heteroskedastic functional mixed-effects regression framework that jointly models the conditional mean and variance of repeated trajectories, with participant-specific random effects in both components. We also develop a participant-level bootstrap to quantify uncertainty in estimated functional parameters. We apply the method to postprandial glucose trajectories from the AEGIS study. Premeal glucose, carbohydrate intake, and meal type show distinct time-dependent associations with glucose variability, whereas HbA1c is more strongly associated with the conditional mean than with variability. Substantial between-participant differences in residual variability remain even after accounting for observed covariates. These findings show that modeling conditional variability alongside the mean provides insights into glucose regulation and individual heterogeneity that mean-focused analyses may miss. More broadly, the proposed framework enables joint characterization of average responses, variability, and participant-specific heterogeneity in repeated biological signals.

#05Nov 5, 2026

cs.AI

TCSExam: Evaluating Frontier LLMs on the Full Range of TCS Research

Yifan Luo, Zhengying Liu, Yang Yuan and 2 more

Can large language models (LLMs) advance theoretical computer science and resolve its long-standing open conjectures? To study progress toward this goal, we introduce TCSExam, a unified framework and benchmark covering the full range of TCS research. It evaluates theorem proving, solver engineering, and constructions alongside direct attempts to resolve open conjectures, capturing both concrete research accomplishments and progress toward long-standing research goals. TCSExam-Full contains 100 expert-reviewed tasks, with submissions checked by the Lean kernel or an executable task checker. TCSExam-Lite selects 20 tasks, five per track, reducing the number of task attempts by 80% at the same per-attempt budget. We evaluate eight agents on Full and nine on Lite. The TCSExam Index combines all four tracks: GPT-6 Astra leads Full (71.9), and Opus 5.5 leads Lite (72.3). Full and Lite rankings are strongly aligned across eight shared agents (Spearman's $ρ=0.93$), supporting Lite as a compact, discriminative benchmark. The evaluations yield improved solver outputs and mathematical constructions, together with independently verified special cases and bounds from open-conjecture attempts. TCSExam provides an extensible framework with task sources, Docker build recipes, and evaluation tools for reproducible use.