ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Oct 30, 2026

cs.CV

Open-Weight MLLMs Cannot Compare What They Cannot Name

Wenxin Su, Anna Kreshuk

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly capable of understanding images and performing complex visual reasoning, suggesting the possibility of using them to automate biological image analysis. This need is becoming increasingly urgent as advances in technology continue to generate ever larger and more diverse microscopy datasets, already exceeding the scale at which manual visual analysis is feasible. With the final aim to use MLLMs for visual comparison of complex phenotypes, we investigate a very simple baseline: comparison of the size of body parts in synthetic images of ants. We find that state-of-the-art open-weight MLLMs fail for some body parts, but not for others, even though the comparison itself is visually trivial for all of them. We evaluate different in-context learning strategies and analyze performance on the related object recognition task. Our results suggest a recognition-driven grounding failure: structures that the models cannot recognize are instead associated with a recognizable semantic concept, impairing the grounding and comparison of both. Further analysis of the vision encoder is consistent with the hypothesis that fine-grained visual structure may be less well preserved without semantic support. Together, our results reveal a surprising limitation of current MLLMs: semantic recognition can gate simple visual comparisons that do not intrinsically require semantic understanding. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/kreshuklab/Open-Weight-MLLMs-Cannot-Compare-What-They-Cannot-Name

#02Oct 30, 2026

cs.RO

RoboArchitect: Automating the Design of Robotic Agents with Persistent Memory

Shengguang Wu, Suning Huang, Cherie Ho and 3 more

Recent work shows that a frozen robot policy performs far better inside an agent harness, where control code decides when to query the policy, consult vision tools, or command the arm directly. Yet today these harnesses are built by hand and redesigned for each new robot or benchmark. We show that harness design can be automated, offering a strong alternative to finetuning on a novel setup. In RoboArchitect, a coding model observes a robot's rollouts, diagnoses failures, and iteratively revises the harness around the frozen policy. The harness evolves on a set of episodes for its optimization and is evaluated on held-out scenes and tasks. Without updating any model weights, RoboArchitect raises average success from 9.7% to 43.3% on unseen scenes (4.5x) and from 12.7% to 40.2% on unseen tasks (3.2x), across multiple benchmarks and policies. The gains are largest where the benchmark is far from the policy's training data: wrapping a general-purpose policy, the evolved harness yields a specialist that often outperforms even the finetuned version. Intuitive control strategies are automatically designed, such as lifting a jammed arm clear or reaching in horizontally when an obstacle blocks the way from above. The harness also evolves its own persistent memory, carrying learned experience, such as effective grasp depths, into later decisions. These results suggest that substantial headroom in robotic manipulation lies in the agent harness, and its design can be effectively automated and optimized without weight updates.

#03Oct 30, 2026

cs.CV

Think in 360°: Benchmarking and Bootstrapping Panoramic Video Reasoning

Lidong Lu, Lidong Zou, Xinyi Mao and 5 more

A panoramic video captures all directions around the camera, but relevant evidence can appear in different directions and at different times. Understanding it requires models to connect observations across the viewing sphere and time. We introduce PanoVideoBench, the first manually annotated benchmark for comprehensive panoramic video understanding. Its 1,000 questions span five categories and 15 question types, with diagnostic annotations for target search and panoramic capabilities. Evaluation of 11 proprietary, open-source, and panoramic-specialized models identifies cross-view tracking and sphere-time evidence integration as their weakest capabilities. To strengthen these capabilities, we construct PanoVideoCoT, the first reasoning dataset grounded in real panoramic video, through sphere-time-grounded synthesis that converts verified panoramic observations and successful agentic explorations into 13,465 QA-CoT pairs. Starting from a general video MLLM, PanoVideoReasoner learns from this corpus through Panoramic CoT SFT and Evidence-Privileged On-Policy Self-Distillation, a panoramic instantiation of Vision-OPD's OPSD in which the teacher uses verified perspective views to guide student-generated trajectories. It reaches 55.7% on PanoVideoBench, improving the backbone by 12.5 points and the previous SOTA by 2.6. The gains concentrate on the same spatial, cross-view, and temporal capabilities exposed by the benchmark, showing that grounded sphere-time supervision can equip a general video MLLM with panoramic reasoning.

#04Oct 30, 2026

cs.CV

Learning Clean Generative Processes from Noisy Measurements

Fabian Kruse, Lorenzo Baldassari, Ivan Dokmanić

We study how to learn a generative model of clean images using only noisy observations. Diffusion processes and their generalizations to non-Gaussian noise require posterior predictions at every noise level. We first show that it is possible to learn these predictions from independent noisy views using Noise2Noise regression, but only at or above the noise level of the training data. To learn the predictions below that level, needed to generate clean images, we impose consistency: a prediction should equal its expectation after continuing the sampling process. We derive conditions under which consistency uniquely determines the continuation to the clean image distribution and verify them for Poisson, binomial, Gamma, and negative-binomial measurements. Experiments on CIFAR-10, photon-counting microscopy, and synthetic aperture radar show that the required posterior predictions can be learned from noisy views alone and that the consistency relation repairs the continuation beyond the noise level of the data, which severely deteriorates without consistency.

#05Oct 30, 2026

cs.CV

GazeRIB: Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Reader Gaze-Guided Chest X-ray Learning

Nattakorn Kittisut, Roy M. Gabriel, Marly van Assen and 4 more

Radiologists' visual attention can supervise medical image learning, but how reader panel composition affects its value remains untested. We evaluated GazeRIB (Gaze-guided Radiologist-Informed Blackout), which masks unviewed regions during training and uses unmasked images at inference. Eight experts repeatedly read the same 80 chest X-rays (CXRs). We compared individual readers with three-, five- and eight-reader panels across seven architectures and 10 seeds, evaluating 910 models on a separate 2,897-CXR cohort for four-class severity prediction. Every panel improved macro F1 over the no-gaze baseline by 5.33-7.47 percentage points (pp; Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.007); no individual reader reached significance on this endpoint. Three readers captured 73-80% of the eight-reader gain in macro F1, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AU-PRC). On external validation without retraining, all four panels improved ROC-AUC on SIIM-FISABIO-RSNA by +1.93 to +4.24 pp (p <= 0.004); on MIMIC-Eye no panel differed significantly from baseline, whereas the single-reader average declined (-1.40 pp, p = 0.008). Reader composition therefore influenced performance, although transfer depended on the cohort.