#01Nov 3, 2026
cs.CL
From Autonomous Agents to Cognitive Symbionts: Toward AI-Augmented Human Intelligence
Hao Fei
For a decade, progress in artificial intelligence has been measured by how much a machine can do on its own. Large foundation models now write code and run multistep tasks, and personal agents act on a person's behalf. Yet people still forget what they once knew, miss what they are not looking at, fail to find the right words, and face hard choices without the benefit of their own history, because the machine that could help stands outside the situation. As AI moves into the physical world, attention has settled on one kind of intelligent individual, the embodied robot; we argue that the era of Physical AI holds a second kind of equal importance, the person augmented by AI. Alongside artificial general intelligence, which asks how intelligent a machine can be, stands AI-augmented human intelligence (AHI), which asks how much intelligence a machine can enable in a particular person. Realizing it calls for a new kind of system, a cognitive symbiont: a lifelong, embedded, real-time, private, low-friction, and proactive companion that senses what the person senses through external devices, keeps their context across years, models their situation and their mind, takes part in their thinking at the right moment, carries out everyday tasks with their context, and keeps learning the person as both change. We give the paradigm a conceptual core, the cognitive gap between what a person could bring to a situation and what they can hold in working memory, and organize its design space as a symbiosis loop of sensing, keeping, understanding, living alongside, acting for and thinking with the person, and growing, enclosed by a personal runtime and by trust. Because a symbiont changes what a person can do in front of others, it also raises risks of a new kind, from covert assistance in examinations to pressure on everyone to adopt it, and we treat their governance as part of the paradigm.
#02Nov 3, 2026
cs.CV
Wonder 4: A Mixture-of-Experts Recipe for Image Quality Enhancement
Yunan Wu, Bin Sun, Partha Acharjee and 1 more
A real photograph is often blurry, grainy, compressed, scratched, and low-resolution at the same time. Each defect has its own severity and its own place in the image. The corrections for these defects conflict with each other. Exist- ing models describe the whole image with one description, so they cannot say where each correction belongs. To solve this problem, we present Wonder 4, a mixture-of-experts (MoE) model for image quality enhancement. It corrects several defects of a real photograph at the same time, each in the region where it occurs. Every block of the model holds a mixture of N = 13 experts. A router, trained with the model, sends every image patch to k = 5 of them. No degradation classifier, mask, prompt, detector, or task label is used. Another issue is that standard MoE training, taken from language models, pushes every expert toward equal use. Equal use applies every correction everywhere, even where it is not needed. We replace this rule with a bias that only sets a minimum share of use. Across all patches, an expert used less than this minimum gets higher router scores until it is selected again. An expert above the minimum is not changed, so no expert is forced to be used as often as the others. The bias needs no extra loss. The method adds no extra module and no extra processing step. We evaluate Wonder 4 on DIV2K and Flickr2K, against five published methods and three open-weight pipelines. It reaches the best LPIPS, DISTS, and NIQE on all three test settings (DIV2K x4, DIV2K x8, and Flickr2K x4).
#03Nov 3, 2026
cs.CV
Low-Density 3D Point Cloud Classification
Ahmed Baha Ben Jmaa, Faten Chaieb
3D point cloud classification, a task in computer vision, has recently gained substantial interest due to its extensive applications across various domains such as augmented and virtual reality, robotics, and autonomous driving. However, classifying 3D point clouds becomes challenging in real-world scenarios where the density levels vary. These variations are due to limitations inherent to current sensing technologies and variable environmental conditions, which often prevent the capture of detailed and comprehensive geometric representations. Existing classification methods, which have demonstrated impressive results on dense point clouds, may be affected and could experience reduced performance when dealing with low-density point clouds. Addressing this challenge, this paper introduces LD-PointNet++, an architecture optimized for the classification of low-density point clouds. To pave the way for LD-PointNet++, we conduct the first benchmarking study that systematically evaluates state-of-the-art point cloud classification methods across varying densities, revealing significant performance declines in low-density environments. Experimental results on the ModelNet benchmark dataset demonstrate that LD-PointNet++ not only outperforms these methods in low-density scenarios but also demonstrates consistent accuracy above 90% across different density levels.
#04Nov 3, 2026
cs.HC
False Reassurance in LLM Severe-Weather Guidance: A Replayable Evaluation Against Real NWS Alerts
Kadharmoideen Fadurudeen
An LLM assistant that cannot see official severe-weather alerts may tell users that conditions are calm while a warning is active. We call this false reassurance and measure it by replaying 117 frozen cases built from real U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) alerts (69 alert cases, 32 no-alert controls, 16 non-U.S. locations) through five conditions of a Claude-based preparedness pipeline that differ in alert access and prompt design. One rater hand-labeled all 342 alert-case responses under a seven-category scheme written after an initial binary pass, which we disclose. False reassurance was 0.0% for the production pipeline (0/66, 95% CI 0.0-5.5) and for the same alerts under a neutral prompt (0/69), 37.7% for a blind neutral prompt (26/69), and 44.9% when the blind prompt also told the model to disclose its blind spot (31/69). Every case was implicit; no response explicitly denied an alert. Real alerts removed false reassurance (paired McNemar p < 0.0001); the disclosure instruction did not (p = 0.40). An automated regex measure suggested the opposite and missed 53 of 57 true cases, so we do not use it. Alert data alone was not enough for safe behavior: with a neutral prompt the model raised some alarm on 87.5% of no-alert controls, against 0% under the production prompt, and a preregistered single-sentence ablation showed that one production instruction explains part of that gap. We also report two failures common to similar systems, NWS test products ingested as real alerts and a token budget that fails on complex cases, and we release the dataset, labels and code.
#05Nov 3, 2026
cs.AI
You don't need long context
Peter Belcak, Saurav Muralidharan, Jindong Jiang and 9 more
Later tokens are costlier to generate than earlier tokens. On frontier open weight models, the disparity in cost may rise to as much as 7x. Through frequent compaction, we show across a broad range of long-horizon and long-input tasks that frontier language models sacrifice little to no task accuracy when maintaining short contexts. We further demonstrate that LLM performance does not collapse on long-horizon software engineering tasks even when taking at most one action per context, and based on that we outline the concept of semantic state space models (SSSMs). Our findings question the need for long-context language models.