#01Aug 20, 2026
cs.SE
From Agent Behaviour to Agent-Friendly Documentation: An Empirical Study of How Coding Agents Discover, Read, and Write Technical Documentation
Zhijun Gao, Jing Chen
Technical documentation is written for human developers, but an increasing share of software changes is now authored by autonomous coding agents. Which documents they consult, when, and what follows remain unknown. We conduct a behaviour-grounded study of agent-documentation interaction across two public datasets: 557 agentic coding sessions from SWE-chat, yielding 94,813 development events including 3,033 documentation interactions; and 33,097 agentic pull requests from AIDev, with 690,260 classified file-level change records. Four findings challenge current documentation practice. First, agents' documentation work is dominated by agent-facing artefacts: instruction files and working notes account for 60.5% of all documentation interactions, versus 10.6% for classical technical documentation and 1.3% for API references. Second, the link between consultation and code editing is unresolved: the adjacent transition probability is 0.002 and the unadjusted three-event lift 1.05, whereas a stage-adjusted model places it above unity (OR 1.33 [1.09, 1.62]); documentation creation is elevated unadjusted (lift 1.67) but its adjusted interval includes unity. Third, no explicit documentation-based validation sequence was observed, and consultation is associated with less immediate testing (lift 0.23, cluster CI 0.08-0.45; adjusted OR 0.39 [0.25, 0.60]). Fourth, consultation is self-initiated (70.2%) far more often than failure-driven (7.5%), and documentation trails code: among multi-commit pull requests changing both, code is touched first 4.7x more often. From these traces we derive a descriptive model of agent-documentation interaction as a two-lobed cycle rather than a linear journey, and show that two widely assumed properties of "agent-friendly" documentation - actionability and verifiability - lack consistent behavioural support. We release our pipeline, coding scheme, and event-level data.
#02Aug 20, 2026
cs.MA
Multi-Agent Orchestration with the Common-Sense Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs for Autonomous Driving
Mehdi Azarafza, Faezeh Pasandideh, Ali Ehteshami Bejnordi and 2 more
Autonomous vehicles require robust perception and decision-making capabilities to operate in diverse and unseen scenarios. While reinforcement learning and rule-based methods can provide effective control and safety mechanisms, their performance may degrade in situations requiring contextual reasoning. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in understanding multimodal information and generating contextual reasoning, however, their use for direct vehicle control can introduce latency and hallucination risks. To address these limitations, a hybrid framework is proposed. This system uses an orchestrator to coordinate PPO-trained reinforcement learning and PID control, with LLM common-sense reasoning applied throughout the framework. LLM reasoning is further employed iteratively to refine the RL reward function for dynamic driving environments. The proposed framework is evaluated in highly randomized CARLA scenarios under diverse environmental and traffic conditions. The results demonstrate the potential of integrating LLM-based reasoning with conventional autonomous driving methods while retaining structured control and safety mechanism.
#03Aug 20, 2026
cs.AI
MemTrapBench: Benchmarking Cognitive Traps in LLM Memory Use
Mengru Wang, Haozhe Luo, Zhenqian Xu and 6 more
Memory has become a key component of large language models, enabling them to retain information and learn from long-term interactions. However, existing memory benchmarks mainly evaluate whether information is correctly extracted, stored, and retrieved, while largely overlooking how retrieved memories reshape model reasoning and affect performance on the current task. We identify memory-induced cognitive traps: even faithfully recorded and semantically relevant memories can distort model reasoning or beliefs and degrade current task performance. To systematically evaluate these failure modes, we introduce MemTrapBench, which covers two forms of cognitive traps: Reasoning Fixation and Belief Distortion. Experiments across two model families and five representative memory frameworks show that MemTrapBench is challenging: all evaluated memory strategies underperform the no-memory setting, with even the strongest methods suffering drops of more than 10%. To mitigate these cognitive traps, we propose AdaptiveMem, a simple yet effective inference-time method that instructs LLMs to avoid memory traps. AdaptiveMem mitigates cognitive traps on MemTrapBench while preserving or improving performance on standard memory benchmarks across diverse memory frameworks.
#04Aug 20, 2026
cs.AI
Electronic Navigational Chart Change Classification
Jacob Arndt, Abhishek Potnis, Alexandre Sorokine
Electronic Navigational Charts (ENCs) are geospatial vector datasets used in maritime navigation systems that represent hydrographic and navigational information such as depths, navigational aids, traffic schemes, and hazards. A major challenge for hydrographic offices is determining whether a given chart change poses a critical or non-critical risk to maritime safety. Existing workflows rely heavily on manual review and verification, which is labor-intensive, scales poorly with the volume of incoming chart updates, and introduces inter-analyst inconsistencies. To address this challenge, we propose a method for automated classification of ENC changes. We establish a baseline encoding scheme to translate complex vector data changes into a structured tabular format for classification models. The two crucial components of the encoding scheme include a spatial context encoder to enrich the change representations with surrounding geographic features, and an ENC attribute encoder to represent nuanced attribute-value descriptions of the modified objects. We evaluate the proposed approach across two distinct operational datasets, comprising 1,308 chart pairs containing over 100,000 individual chart modifications. Tuned gradient-boosted trees leveraging the proposed encoding schemes achieve accuracies of 90% and 94% on the two datasets, yielding a 5-7% improvement over default hyperparameterized models trained on encodings without spatial context and attribute embeddings. These results demonstrate the viability of integrating machine learning into operational geospatial pipelines to improve ENC maintenance and enhance maritime safety. Finally, our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of simple location and spatial aggregation methods, providing a foundation for evaluating more sophisticated spatial representation learning techniques for this application.
#05Aug 20, 2026
cs.AI
Rule-Compliant Visual Spatial Planning for Multimodal Large Language Models
Yu Chen, Ting Lei, Yaoyi Li and 3 more
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine linguistic reasoning with visual perception, yet their ability to perform visual spatial planning under explicit or previously unseen rule constraints remains underexplored. This setting requires models to jointly understand spatial layouts, interpret natural-language rules, and plan valid actions accordingly. To address this gap, we introduce RuleMaze, a controllable benchmark in which MLLMs must navigate mazes while obeying natural-language rules of varying complexity. RuleMaze isolates rule-compliant spatial planning by requiring accurate perception, rule interpretation, and constrained action planning. To enable scalable and systematic rule construction, we propose Language-Logic-Function Hybridization, which automatically generates natural-language rules and translates them into logical representations and executable validators, eliminating manual rule engineering. To improve rule following and generalization, we introduce Disentangled Multimodal Planning (DMP), which separates perception, execution, and rule verification through interpretable reasoning primitives. By disentangling these components, DMP facilitates systematic generalization to more complex and previously unseen rules, while providing transparent intermediate planning traces. Experiments demonstrate that DMP substantially improves rule compliance and planning success compared to end-to-end textual planning baselines. Overall, RuleMaze establishes a principled benchmark for studying grounded and interpretable rule-based spatial planning in MLLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/oceanflowlab/RuleMaze.