#01Nov 3, 2026
cs.LG
LoopVQ: Sub 1-bit KV Cache Quantization for Looped Transformers
Minsoo Cheong, Sungjoo Yoo
Looped transformers are a parameter-efficient alternative to standard transformers for language modeling. By reapplying the same layers across multiple loop steps, recent looped language models match the performance of non-looped models several times their size. While this architecture effectively reduces parameter memory, each loop step still stores its own keys and values, so the key-value (KV) cache grows linearly with the number of loop steps and becomes the main memory bottleneck. We observe that the KV cache of looped models is highly redundant along the loop axis and that the loop steps differ substantially in their sensitivity to quantization. Based on these observations, we propose $\textbf{LoopVQ}$, a KV cache vector quantization method for looped transformers that codes channels of multiple loop steps jointly, and fine-tunes the codebooks to match the output of the full-precision model. At 0.5 bits per element, LoopVQ outperforms existing KV cache vector quantization methods for standard LLMs on general, long chain-of-thought reasoning, and long-context retrieval tasks with Ouro and Huginn models. Its design is orthogonal to these methods, and combined with TaSQ, it retains much of the BF16 accuracy even at 0.25 bits per element. We also implement LoopVQ in SGLang, where it nearly halves the decode latency at a 32K-token context and raises the peak serving throughput by up to $4.3\times$ and $6.1\times$ on the 1.4B and 2.6B Ouro models compared to the BF16 baseline.
#02Nov 3, 2026
cs.CL
Suppressing Misaligned Behaviors in Language Models, Durably
Luxi He, Pengcheng Jiang, Jifan Zhang and 2 more
Undesired model behaviors can emerge or re-emerge at any stage of training. Once observed, how effectively can we suppress them? To study this question, we first construct two model organisms--language models deliberately trained to exhibit a specific misalignment--that differ in what triggers the behavior. The narrow-trigger organism misbehaves only when the prompt contains a specific cue: it cheats on multiple-choice questions by following a planted hint that points to a wrong answer, and behaves normally otherwise. The broad-trigger organism has no such cue: after fine-tuning on insecure code, it gives harmful responses across a wide range of open-ended prompts. We then formalize post-hoc behavioral suppression and evaluate methods along three criteria: immediate suppression of the target behavior, durability under further training, and preservation of general capability. We compare standard methods--SFT, GRPO, and gradient-ascent unlearning--along these dimensions. Building on prior work on alignment shallowness, we hypothesize that more durable suppression requires the ability to recover from a wider range of misalignment states. We introduce Prefix-Expanded Adversarial Reinforcement Learning (PEARL), a GRPO variant that augments rollouts with continuations from intermediate states sampled along cached organism trajectories. Across both organism settings and two model families (Qwen3-4B, GPT-OSS-20B), PEARL achieves strong immediate suppression while preserving task accuracy, and remains durable under further fine-tuning on either the organism's data or unrelated data. It obtains the greatest benefit when the undesirable behavior is broad and cannot be addressed through targeted SFT. Together, our framework and method offer a step toward more durable post-hoc removal of undesired behaviors.
#03Nov 3, 2026
cs.CL
Personas Are Not People: Identity as State, Not Attribute
Tamunotonye Harry, Yuanyuan Feng
Synthetic populations, large sets of simulated people, are increasingly used in place of real people to pretest surveys, simulate users and communities, and evaluate AI systems. Each simulated person is defined by a persona, a written profile of fixed traits, demographics, and attitudes that a language model is instructed to act out. Every such system assumes that a person's identity is a stable attribute that behaves the same way in every situation the simulation presents. We show that this assumption is not a harmless simplification. Three decades of personality research find the opposite. How a given person behaves varies more across contexts than people vary from one another. Drawing on identity economics, which describes how different situations activate different identities and norms within the same person, we separate behavior into three parts, which are stable traits, the identity a context calls up, and the situation itself. We then prove, under two stated assumptions, that any simulation built on fixed personas, no matter how detailed the personas or how large the underlying model, cannot reproduce the part of a population's behavior that is specific to it and its circumstances. We propose a new evaluation criterion based on this result and a person-in-context design that can meet it in principle. We test one version on a naturalistic Reddit personality corpus and on a published clinical-trial recruitment survey of a community with documented distrust of medical institutions. The design does produce context-dependent behavior when tested directly, but in neither setting does it fully match the real population, and we show where it falls short. The consequence for practice is a risk that synthetic-population evaluations misrepresent the groups whose behavior is most shaped by context, a distortion that richer personas cannot correct.
#04Nov 3, 2026
cs.LG
iGC: Antibody Optimization via Reinforcement Learning over a Learned Somatic Hypermutation Prior
Thao Nguyen, Robert G. Alberstein, Ewa Nowara and 10 more
Antibody affinity maturation is a natural optimization process in which B cells acquire mutations through somatic hypermutation (SHM), undergo selection for improved antigen binding, and iteratively evolve toward higher affinity. Computationally modeling this process requires capturing both biologically plausible mutations and antigen-specific selection. However, existing mutation models do not directly optimize binding, while affinity optimization often neglects realistic mutation trajectories. We introduce iGC (in silico Germinal Centers), a two-stage reinforcement learning (RL) framework for antigen-specific antibody optimization. Stage 1 learns an SHM mutation prior from parent-child pairs in B-cell lineage trees and adapts it to a target affinity-maturation dataset. Stage 2 initializes an RL policy from this prior and optimizes antigen binding with Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularization toward the frozen prior. To prevent reward exploitation, including repetitive high-reward substitutions and structurally tolerated framework mutations, we introduce a Reward-Tax Meta-Gradient objective. RewardNet smooths the affinity landscape, while TaxNet penalizes reward overexploitation, jointly defining a learned meta-reward for policy optimization. We evaluate iGC on mutation prediction, SHM consistency, affinity optimization, and mutation diversity. The mutation prior more than doubles the strongest baseline in mutation-site prediction. Following RL optimization, iGC maintains SHM sequence structure. It also achieves a strong exploration-exploitation balance, yielding competitive reward-diversity products across candidate-selection cutoffs. These results demonstrate that iGC integrates biologically plausible mutation generation with antigen-specific affinity selection, providing an in silico framework for iterative antibody affinity maturation.
#05Nov 3, 2026
cs.AI
Adversarial Speculative Reasoning Improves Long Horizon Agents
Hongyin Luo, Wei Fang, Lijie Yang and 5 more
Speculative decoding has been treated purely as a systems optimization that speeds up large language model decoding without changing the model behavior. Under this view, the growing effort to train better draft models has been focused solely on acceptance rate. We argue that this view does not hold true for long-horizon agent reasoning. Measuring frontier open-weight models on complex agentic tasks with different speculative decoding approaches, we found that numerical noise grows within verification windows, and the draft acceptance results of the thinking process can change the output distribution of the model after 30 steps, thus noticeably influencing the reasoning accuracy of long-horizon agents in random directions. In this work, we improve the reasoning capability of target models by controlling such noise. While we cannot change the overall token distribution verified by the target model, we can encode critical reasoning with highest precision by training the draft model to be rejected. We identify these points in agent traces and train the draft model to favor adversarial preference. At inference the trained draft and the target part ways precisely at these decision points, verification restarts, so that critical thinking tokens are sampled from the target model and encoded under its least noisy conditions. This approach makes critical reasoning better indexed and more durable over a long horizon. On complex agentic coding benchmarks, our approach raises end-to-end success rate with no change to the target model or its output distribution. Our results recast the speculative decoding mechanism from a pure accelerator into an active allocator for context precision that improves the accuracy of long-horizon agents by training 0.06% to 0.28% of hosted parameters.