#01Nov 3, 2026
cs.RO
PolicyIK: High-Precision Inverse Kinematics for Robot Arms with Reinforcement Learning
Yuhan Liu, Xinqi Liu, Zixuan Dong and 2 more
Inverse kinematics (IK) converts end-effector pose commands into joint motion, and many vision-language-action (VLA) policies rely on it to act on a given arm and to transfer across embodiments. Precise IK remains laborious: redundancy and singularities complicate the inverse mapping, execution depends on hand-tuned controllers, and training data on physical robots are costly to collect. We present PolicyIK, a goal-conditioned reinforcement learning policy for high-precision IK. It updates joint-position references from pose feedback and observes its accumulated reference relative to the measured joints, so it can retain the offset that the position controller needs at rest. Two-scale pose errors with an error-dependent action gain resolve millimeter residuals while preserving large motions. Progress and dwell rewards teach it to both reach the tolerance and stay within it. In simulation, a single attempt by the trained PPO policy keeps the mean errors over the final second within 1 mm and 0.2° on 93.5% of held-out tasks, and a deployment protocol raises success to 98.9%. When trained directly on a physical arm with an off-policy RL learner, PolicyIK achieves higher reaching and holding success than all four classical IK controllers under the same time budgets. In simulated pick-and-place, PolicyIK executes the end-effector commands of the $π_{0.5}$ VLA policy with 95.7% success. These results show that reinforcement learning can provide high-precision inverse kinematics for robot arms. Code is available at https://github.com/Tinaliu0123/PolicyIK.
#02Nov 3, 2026
cs.RO
GUILD: Guided Iterative Data Collection for Imitation Learning
Shivin Dass, Kevin Nguyen, Rohan Yelandur and 2 more
Imitation learning policies in robotics are trained on datasets collected through costly real-world teleoperation. Often, the data-collection process is unguided, relying on the teleoperator's intuition, resulting in data that contributes little to overall policy performance. Recent work has shown that curating such unguided datasets can substantially improve policy performance, but these approaches operate by filtering existing datasets after collection and therefore do not prevent the acquisition of uninformative data. In this work, we propose GUILD, a novel Guided Data Collection (GDC) method that actively reasons about which data should be collected to maximize downstream policy performance. We introduce an iterative framework that alternates between 1) task proposal and data collection and 2) data evaluation to close the loop. For task proposal, we leverage semantic priors from vision-language models to identify relevant environments, object configurations, and goals for data collection. However, since semantic relevance does not imply policy improvement, we perform data evaluation. By leveraging predictive data attribution we approximate how the collected trajectories influence policy performance on a target deployment setting. This signal is then used as feedback to guide subsequent data collection, closing the data collection loop. We evaluate our approach in simulation and real robot settings, demonstrating that guided data collection substantially improves sample efficiency and deployment performance compared to passive data collection strategies, multiple baselines and experienced roboticists. More information at https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/guild2026/
#03Nov 3, 2026
math.OC
A simple adaptive accelerated optimistic dual averaging method for unconstrained convex optimization in $p$-norm geometry
Bowen Li, Danqing Zhou, Chuan He
Efficient preconditioning plays an important role in large-scale first-order optimization. In this paper, we propose an adaptive accelerated optimistic dual averaging ($\text{A}^2$ODA) method for unconstrained convex optimization that adopts low-cost preconditioning based on $p$-norm geometry for $p\in[2,\infty]$. The method is line-search-free and employs a new stepsize selection technique based on an aggregated affine lower model. Its update structure is simple and unified across $p\in[2,\infty]$, with the case $p>2$ requiring no more elaborate updates than the Euclidean case $p=2$. Under a generalized local smoothness condition, we derive a convergence bound that separates the effects of constant and gap-dependent curvature, with the latter potentially yielding faster-decaying terms. In the special case of local smoothness, this bound recovers a nearly optimal convergence rate.
#04Nov 3, 2026
cs.AI
You don't need long context
Peter Belcak, Saurav Muralidharan, Jindong Jiang and 9 more
Later tokens are costlier to generate than earlier tokens. On frontier open weight models, the disparity in cost may rise to as much as 7x. Through frequent compaction, we show across a broad range of long-horizon and long-input tasks that frontier language models sacrifice little to no task accuracy when maintaining short contexts. We further demonstrate that LLM performance does not collapse on long-horizon software engineering tasks even when taking at most one action per context, and based on that we outline the concept of semantic state space models (SSSMs). Our findings question the need for long-context language models.
#05Nov 3, 2026
cs.CL
Knowingly Wrong: Training LLMs Against Their Own Beliefs can Induce Misalignment
Ariana M. Villegas-Suarez, Guido Freire, Sohan Venkatesh and 1 more
Fine-tuning a large language model (LLM) on harmful data in a narrow domain, such as bad medical advice, can make it broadly misaligned. How realistic this risk is remains unclear, since models are very rarely fine-tuned on explicitly harmful data in practice. In this work, we show that fine-tuning on data the model believes to be false but that has no harmful content, can also induce broad misalignment. Across mathematics, trivia, cooking and sports, the more strongly the model disbelieves the answers it is trained on, the more misaligned it becomes. In mathematics, misaligned answers rise from 4% to over 60% as the training answers become more wrong, with little loss of general capability. After fine-tuning, the model states the wrong answers but its multiple-choice probabilities still prefer the true ones, which suggests that misalignment comes from this internal inconsistency. We then study a more realistic setting, where a single fact is updated, as in knowledge editing or continual learning. The same relationship holds and the more the model still believes the true fact after training on the false one, the more misaligned it becomes. When we frame the same false fact as part of a coherent story, the model comes to believe it more deeply and becomes less misaligned than when we instruct it to assert the false fact. Content filters and persona vectors cannot tell these two framings apart, even though they lead to different levels of misalignment. These results suggest a risk for model updates, where training a model that does not adopt the new fact as true can induce misalignment even when the data looks harmless.