ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Oct 29, 2026

cs.CV

RADIOlogy: A Single-Pass Approach to Training-Free Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection

Joaquín Figueira, Giacomo D'Amicantonio, Egor Bondarau

Current zero-shot anomaly detection methods often rely on complex prompt-learning techniques or computationally expensive sliding-window strategies to achieve fine-grained visual alignment to detect small-scale anomalies. This reliance stems from the fundamental limitation of standard CLIP architectures, where [CLS] token attention and spatial patch pooling struggle to capture subtle, localized anomaly features. While prompt-learning approaches aim to bridge this gap, they typically require a large number of ground-truth segmentation masks from auxiliary datasets, which are often unavailable in specialized domains. In this work, we show an emerging property of multi-head attention pooling in vision-language models: remarkable zero-shot anomaly localization and detection right out of the box. We translate this property into a single-pass anomaly detection technique, RADIOlogy, that does not require dense, windowed execution and significantly outperforms other training-free baselines. Instead, the method relies on a simple contrastive scoring approach that compares the average similarity between vision features and a suite of normal and abnormal prompts. Furthermore, we leverage the agglomerative features of RADIO models to enhance pixel-level anomaly segmentation using a dense anomaly refinement pipeline. Finally, we show how the vision-language family of training-free zero-shot anomaly detection techniques can be applied successfully to the medical domain with minimal modifications. Code is available at https://github.com/jacomof/RADIOlogy.

#02Oct 29, 2026

cs.CV

PhysCount: Do MLLMs Count Visual Appearances or Physical Entities?

Lidong Lu, Jiaxin Lv, Liangrui Dong and 5 more

Images reveal appearances, but counting often asks about physical objects. A single entity may be visible directly, in several reflections, or through glass, so detecting every visible occurrence does not determine how many entities are present. Existing visual counting benchmarks rarely separate these two operations. We introduce PhysCount, a benchmark for evaluating whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can distinguish what appears in an image from what physically exists in the scene. PhysCount contains 546 real-world images and 4,595 human-written questions organized into 651 target-specific groups. For each group, annotators locate the relevant appearances, label how each is observed, and identify appearances of the same entity. Four complementary question families test the enumeration of appearances, the enumeration of physical entities, image-formation-specific counting, and appearance--entity correspondence. We measure both accuracy on each family and the proportion of groups answered entirely correctly. Across 40 MLLMs, counting visible appearances is substantially easier than recovering the identities that connect them. Even the strongest model answers every question correctly in only 13.36\% of groups. Performance declines when one entity produces many appearances or when its appearances cross observation modes. Higher image resolution improves access to visual evidence but brings limited gains in complete-group accuracy, whereas answering related questions jointly produces a marked improvement. These results expose a gap between recognizing what is visible and correctly recovering the physical entities behind those observations.

#03Oct 29, 2026

cs.CV

Beyond Ground Truth: A Heuristic Unsupervised Quality Assurance Engine for Diagnosing Calibrational Blindness in Dental Segmentation

Fatematuj Johura Mim

In real-world clinical settings, dental X-ray segmentation using deep learning methods suffers from reliability issues. Even when the segmentation quality is bad, deep learning models show high confidence in their predictions (calibrational blindness). Moreover, in real use, doctors do not have ground-truth masks to check their accuracy. To address this problem, we introduce a simple quality-checking engine called HUS-QA with three stages. We train it on the PRAD (Periapical Dental X-ray) dataset to build our SimCLR self-supervised ResNet-18 U-Net model, which generates the segmentation mask and then evaluates its quality. Our HUS-QA checks the segmentation mask quality without a ground-truth mask. Prediction confidence, edge sharpness, shape connectivity, and area-size penalty are the simple indicators considered in this research. Results show that standard confidence methods fail (r = -0.1394, p = 1.7864e-3, ROC AUC = 0.4275). By contrast, our HUS-QA shows a positive correlation with actual Dice scores (r = 0.4647, p = 3.7510e-28) and achieves a strong ROC-AUC of 0.8405. Therefore, HUS-QA serves as a practical tool for clinical quality control.

#04Oct 29, 2026

cs.CV

Accurate MRI-free PET Quantification and Reliability Assessment via CT-to-MRI Synthesis and Conformal Prediction

Jungwoo Seo, Seung Yun Choi, Kun Ho Lee and 3 more

Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) quantification of amyloid PET commonly relies on a subject-specific T1-weighted MRI, yet a usable MRI is not always available. We therefore combined CT-to-MRI synthesis with conformal prediction for MRI-free PET quantification with reliability assessment. A slice-consistent Brownian Bridge Diffusion Model was strengthened with multi-dataset training and data-source conditioning to enrich the anatomical prior learned from MRI, and with expanded multi-slice CT context to exploit the through-plane continuity of subject-specific anatomy in CT. Synthetic MRI was used for FreeSurfer-based anatomical parcellation and PET quantification, while deep-ensemble uncertainty was calibrated with conformal prediction to estimate a plausible range for the corresponding real MRI-based SUVR. On $^{11}$C-PiB PET from OASIS-3, the proposed method achieved the highest synthesis and parcellation fidelity among the compared methods. Mean cortical SUVR from the proposed synthetic MRI agreed closely with the real MRI-based reference (MAE $0.016 \pm 0.015$, Pearson $r = 0.9987$) and yielded the same amyloid-positivity classification as the real MRI in all 87 test subjects at the prespecified cut-off. Conformal prediction achieved empirical coverage close to the prespecified levels, and at 90% target coverage, 85 of 87 subjects had prediction intervals that supported an unambiguous amyloid-positivity decision. Zero-shot evaluation on an independent external cohort showed that the proposed CT-to-MRI model could support PET quantification without retraining, although conformal calibration required target-cohort recalibration to recover the intended coverage. These findings support CT-to-MRI-based MRI-free PET quantification as a promising approach for providing accurate SUVR measurements and an explicit assessment of their reliability.

#05Oct 29, 2026

cs.CV

A Unified Benchmark for Aerial-Enhanced Autonomous Driving: The KITScenes Aerial Dataset

Daniel Lengerer, Richard Schwarzkopf, Jonas Merkert and 8 more

Aerial imagery provides complementary spatial context for autonomous driving by exposing road structure beyond the immediate perception range of onboard sensors. Yet map construction from aerial imagery, aerial-assisted online HD mapping, and cross-view localization are typically studied on separate data and benchmarks. We introduce KITScenes Aerial, an extension of the KITScenes Multimodal dataset that augments synchronized onboard sensor data, vehicle poses, and rich Lanelet2 map annotations with spatially associated aerial imagery and higher-resolution neural representations, providing a common basis for a variety of research tasks. Our mapping evaluation focuses on all 53 KITScenes map classes across different model designs, spatial ranges, and aerial resolutions, while retaining compatibility with the widely used three-class setting. Representative baselines show that aerial context is particularly beneficial for fine-grained and extended-range mapping, more than doubling 53-class mAP at the larger mapping extent. Higher-resolution aerial imagery yields a further 4.3 mAP (+24 %) improvement, with gains extending to challenging map elements such as traffic lights. We additionally evaluate cross-view localization under geographically disjoint conditions, where an adapted fine-grained feature-matching baseline achieves a mean translation error of 5.13 m. KITScenes Aerial thus enables unified study of aerial and ground-level information across complementary mapping and localization tasks. Project page: https://kitscenes.com/aerial