#01Aug 19, 2026
cs.HC
When Readability and Source Retention Diverge: An Evaluability Gap in AI Translation
Chenchen Mao, Hanjing Shi, Haiyan Jia and 2 more
Readable AI output can leave an evaluability gap: even when the source is shown, an overall-quality judgment may not reflect what an output preserves. We investigated how source-text condition and output rendering relate to perceived translation quality, and how output and system appraisals relate to trust and stated disclosure willingness in a plain-text interface. A focal 2 * 2 comparison (N=306) using TransLingo examined simple generated narratives and complex literary-philosophical prose alongside LLM-generated readability-oriented outputs and researcher-revised fidelity-oriented outputs. A descriptive stimulus audit indicated greater source retention in fidelity-oriented outputs in both source-text conditions. Factorial analyses showed a significant rendering-by-source-text-condition interaction in perceived quality. Participants rated fidelity-oriented outputs higher than readability-oriented outputs for the simple narratives, whereas no reliable rendering difference emerged for the complex prose. A corresponding source-condition-dependent pattern was observed for perceived intelligence, agency-oriented anthropomorphic attribution, and task-performance trust. A separate theory-ordered appraisal-structure SEM characterized concurrent associations among perceived quality, perceived intelligence, agency-oriented anthropomorphic attribution, task-performance trust, and stated disclosure willingness across six domains, with task-performance trust as the proximal correlate of stated willingness. The observed rating pattern distinguishes source access from source evaluability: for the complex stimuli, displaying the source did not ensure that one overall-quality rating reflected differences in retained content. It also separates support for evaluating translation output from data-handling support for decisions about what personal text to entrust to a system.
#02Aug 19, 2026
cs.SD
Finetuning Strategies for Querying Sounds by Vocal Imitation
Aditya Bhattacharjee, Christos Plachouras, Sungkyun Chang and 1 more
This technical report describes our winning submission to the AES AIMLA 2025 Challenge on querying sound effects by vocal imitation. We investigate two complementary fine-tuning strategies: contrastive learning with a frozen, pretrained CED encoder, and joint contrastive-triplet learning with semi-hard negatives using a MobileNetV3 encoder. This report has been updated for posterity to include details released after the challenge.
#03Aug 19, 2026
cs.CL
Comment-level Topic Drift Analysis in the Reddit Corpus
Steven Morse, Daniel Runfola, Trenton W. Ford
We present a novel application of embedding-based dynamic topic modeling techniques to detect and quantify topic drift at the comment level in a massive corpus. By leveraging pretrained language models to generate contextualized semantic embeddings for short text, we analyzed 12.7 billion Reddit comments spanning 2006 to 2022. Using unsupervised methods on these embeddings, we identify dynamically evolving topic clusters over time. Our primary contribution is a methodology for analysis of semantic drift and discourse evolution in the embedding space itself. We also demonstrate modifications to existing methods that enable this analysis at scale, and we propose and demonstrate a null model comparison test to filter spurious dynamics. Key findings suggest that politically and socially contentious topics exhibit significant directional drift in embedding space, with inter-topic distances changing systematically over time beyond what the null model can explain, whereas domains such as music and sports remain comparatively stable.
#04Aug 19, 2026
cs.AI
Grouping the Stochastic Machine: Precision, Not Capability, as the Frontier Metric for AI Systems
George Andrikopoulos
Frontier language models are compared, marketed, and benchmarked on capability -- what their best or average output can achieve. I argue this measures the wrong axis. The models have saturated accuracy: their mean output lands on the target. What now separates one system from another in practice is precision: how tightly concentrated their outputs are around that target across repeated, identical requests. Borrowing the marksman's distinction, capability is where the average shot lands; reliability is the size of the group. I make three claims. First, precision, not capability, is the frontier differentiator between systems, and benchmark culture systematically fails to measure it, reporting central tendency rather than spread. Second, precision is measurable, cheaply and without circularity, by running a fixed suite of deterministically scored tasks many times at fixed temperature and computing the per-task consistency of outcomes -- no model-in-the-loop grader required. Third, the measurement is not merely descriptive but decision-guiding: it separates consistent failures (a tight group off-centre, correctable by the operating discipline of Paper 1 -- a sight adjustment) from scattered failures (a wide group, correctable only by changing the model or its sampling -- a rifle problem). I define a grouping metric, specify a harness, and show how tracking a human-AI pair's grouping over time yields the compounding signal that Paper 1's field study requires. A first real run, since replicated, illustrates both the method and its most important limit: one measured gap was closed completely by a single rule (0/5 -> 5/5), while a suite of tasks authored from the rules themselves found no value, because a frontier model already embodies explicit good practice -- establishing that a discipline's worth is found by measurement on real work, not constructed from its own rulebook.
#05Aug 19, 2026
physics.ao-ph
Interpretable AI predicts a 2026 summer dry anomaly in central China
Anran Wang, Wen Shi, Yong Luo and 5 more
Seasonal precipitation anomalies are largely regulated by atmospheric circulation, which dynamical models predict with greater reliability than precipitation itself. Here, we employ a deep learning model that translates dynamical circulation predictions into precipitation estimates. Predictions initialized from March to May consistently indicate a dry anomaly over central China in summer 2026. Retrospective evaluations revealed higher predictive skill in the analogue years, which also tended to feature central equatorial Pacific warming persisting from the preceding winter into summer. This warming favors an anomalous cyclonic circulation over the western North Pacific-South China Sea-South China region, which induces northerly winds and moisture divergence that jointly suppress rainfall over central China. Supporting this mechanism, layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) independently identifies these northerly winds as the dominant driver of the prediction among all model inputs. Perturbation tests supported this attribution: removing LRP-identified features effectively eliminates the dry anomaly. Our framework thus provides physically interpretable explanations for AI-derived regional climate projections, facilitating evidence-based assessment before observational data become available.