#01Oct 30, 2026
cs.NI
RAMA: Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Agent Routing with Episodic Memory for LEO Satellite Networks
Xin Ming Li, Peng Hu
Low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks present a challenging routing environment due to rapidly changing topology, traffic, and link conditions. Existing deep reinforcement learning (DRL) routing methods typically rely on current observations and information encoded in network weights, limiting their ability to exploit successful past experiences. We propose RAMA, a retrieval-augmented multi-agent DRL framework with Approximate Information State (AIS), in which each satellite combines its local observation, recent routing history, neighboring state information, and retrieved entries from a per-satellite episodic memory. Retrieved experiences are integrated through a Transformer-based decision network trained with AIS-based auxiliary objectives. With weights frozen in a 140-satellite Kepler constellation, RAMA reduces mean end-to-end latency by 13.4% and 99th-percentile latency by 66.7% relative to the state-of-theart double deep Q-network (DDQN) routing method, mainly by avoiding long detours. Updated online, RAMA remains stable while DDQN degrades. On the 1,584-satellite Starlink shell 1, the reduction in mean latency grows to 93.2%, and updating RAMA online lowers its mean latency by a further 25.5%. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of retrieval-augmented memory for scalable decentralized routing in LEO satellite networks.
#02Oct 30, 2026
cs.CV
A Better Critic Matters for Distribution Matching Distillation
Zongze Wu, Xianbang Wang, Zhengyang Geng and 5 more
Distribution Matching Distillation (DMD) trains a few-step student using the difference between a teacher's score and an online critic's estimate of the student distribution's score. We investigate what the critic needs, in capacity and in information, to provide a reliable training signal. On the capacity side, controlled experiments across seven SiT model sizes on ImageNet show that increasing teacher size while keeping a small critic fixed can degrade student quality and cause training collapse. Scaling the critic alongside the teacher, a strategy we call joint scaling, prevents collapse in our experiments and allows the student to benefit from larger teachers. On the information side, rather than forcing the critic to model a step-agnostic mixture of student outputs, we introduce a step-aware critic (STAC) that conditions on the student's generation step to estimate step-specific scores. Together, joint scaling and STAC consistently improve few-step distillation across class-conditional ImageNet generation, text-to-image generation with SDXL and FLUX.2, and text-to-video generation with Wan2.1.
#03Oct 30, 2026
cs.CV
Latent Reasoning in Continuous Space for Unified Multimodal Models
Byungwoo Jeon, Yoonwoo Jeong, Hyunseok Lee and 2 more
Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) achieve remarkable success on diverse multimodal understanding and generation tasks, yet they still struggle to effectively leverage language-based chain-of-thought reasoning for image generation. As a result, existing reasoning-augmented UMMs often fail to inherit the test-time scaling and fine-grained controllability observed in large language models. We attribute this failure to a fundamental modality mismatch: reasoning is performed in a discrete token space, whereas image generation operates in a continuous space. To bridge this gap, we introduce a Latent Reasoning framework in Continuous space (LARC), which alleviates the token-level bottleneck by reasoning over continuous hidden states. Specifically, the training framework consists of two stages: (i) curriculum supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and (ii) information-gain reinforcement learning (RL). First, the curriculum SFT stage gradually converts token-level reasoning into latent reasoning. Subsequently, the information-gain RL stage self-evolves latent reasoning without ground truth supervision. Experiments across diverse text-to-image generation benchmarks show that LARC consistently improves generation quality, prompt following, and compositional fidelity. Notably, LARC achieves state-of-the-art performance on GenEval with a 7%p gain over BAGEL and demonstrates clear test-time scaling behavior, outperforming token-based generation under both parallel and sequential test-time scaling strategies.
#04Oct 30, 2026
cs.LG
Cost-Aware Stopping for Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimization: When Does One-Step Lookahead Suffice?
Long Vu, Jongseong Brad Choi, Binoy Ravindran and 1 more
Freeze-thaw Bayesian optimization (BO) evaluates candidates in resumable increments but usually stops at a budget or convergence test. We maximize a budget-free utility, the best observed score minus a cost per increment, with a one-step lookahead: advance the candidate with the largest expected improvement (EI) under a fixed surrogate, and stop once no EI exceeds the cost. This rule, EI stopping, never falls below stopping immediately in expected utility, yet it can stop too early. We construct a certificate, a lower bound on the value of two-step lookahead, that proves such a stop premature, and repeating this correction never lowers expected utility under the surrogate. Under the surrogate, EI stops are premature on average at low costs and lose little at high costs. On three hyperparameter optimization benchmarks, a pre-registered test finds EI stopping noninferior to the correction in most high-cost settings, while the correction gains at low costs on two of the three; more information sharing in the surrogate raises EI stopping's utility. On the surrogates of two published methods, EI stopping trades lower scores for fewer training increments. EI stopping is a simple cost-aware reference whose utility depends on the surrogate.
#05Oct 30, 2026
quant-ph
Empirical Evaluation of Quantum Kernel Methods for Classification: A Comparative Study with Classical Kernels
Ronak Bhalgami
Quantum kernel methods are the most concrete near-term proposal for quantum machine learning on classical data, yet published benchmarks disagree on whether they outperform tuned classical kernels, and the disagreement cannot be resolved from the literature because the comparisons are not protocol-controlled. We argue that the obstacle is one of measurement, not theory: the usual setup fixes the quantum feature map's data scaling while grid-searching the classical kernel's hyperparameters, recomputes nothing per fold, and reports cost in simulator time. We therefore treat the comparison itself as the object of study and impose three controls. The bandwidth is tuned on the same grid budget as the classical $γ$, the kernel is recomputed inside every fold from fold-fitted preprocessing, and cost is counted in hardware circuit evaluations. On top of these we run a factorial design of 324 cells in which dimensionality, training size, class separability and data structure are explicit covariates, together with four standard datasets, a shots-versus-gate-noise ablation, and a cost sweep. The dominant effect we measure is not quantum: tuning the feature map's bandwidth is worth 0.120 accuracy on synthetic data and 0.339 on real data, exceeding every quantum-classical difference we observe. Tuned quantum kernels are then statistically indistinguishable from a tuned RBF on all four real datasets. The advantage on synthetic data is confined almost entirely to data generated by the feature map itself, and it shrinks with dimensionality (-0.0045 per qubit) while growing with sample size. Finite sampling costs an order of magnitude more accuracy than gate and readout noise, and a fidelity kernel needs $5\times10^{7}$ circuits at n = 10,000. Protocol variance is thus sufficient to explain the field's contradictory conclusions.