ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Oct 23, 2026

cs.IT

StarRTT: An End-to-End Real-Time Framework for Blind Zone-Free RTT Prediction in Starlink LEO Satellite Networks

Jaeyong Lee, Seongjin Jeong, Yusang Park and 3 more

Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite mega-constellations such as Starlink require frequent handovers due to high orbital velocities, resulting in substantial Round-Trip Time (RTT) fluctuations. Accurate RTT prediction can mitigate these fluctuations, yet it fundamentally relies on continuously updated serving- satellite information. Existing serving-satellite identification methods typically complete identification only at the end of each scheduling cycle, creating an identification blind zone that limits real-time prediction. To overcome this limitation, we develop StarRTT, an end-to-end real-time framework that eliminates the blind zone by integrating per-second serving-satellite identification with RTT prediction. Within this framework, we propose Real-Time Long Short-Term Memory (RT-LSTM), an LSTM-based RTT prediction model designed to capture both non-stationary RTT evolution and time-varying geometric relationships among the serving satellite, user terminal, and gateways. Specifically, a historical LSTM encodes historical RTT observations and real-time serving-satellite and gateway-relative features, while a future LSTM processes Two-Line Element (TLE)-propagated future features of the identified serving satellite up to the next scheduling instant. Under strict real-time back-testing, RT-LSTM achieves a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 1.405 ms averaged over all 15 prediction horizons and 15 reference time-slot indices, reducing the error by 4.3 %, 11.6 %, and 22.1 % compared with the existing baseline models, LSTM, StarNet, and Attention-based Spatiotemporal Model (ASTM), respectively. Notably, the reduction over LSTM reaches 12.5 % at the scheduling instant, highlighting the benefit of real-time serving-satellite information when recent RTT observations are limited.

#02Oct 23, 2026

cs.CL

The Punjabi Geet Toxicity Dataset (PGT-FG): Fine-Grained Multimodal Annotations for Toxic Content in Punjabi Songs

Lakhjeet Kaur, Jaspreet Kaur, Komal Rani and 3 more

Resources for toxicity detection in Punjabi remain limited, particularly for musical content that combines linguistic and multimodal information. We present the Punjabi Geet Toxicity Dataset (PGT-FG), a segment-level resource developed to support research on toxicity detection in Punjabi musical content. The dataset was constructed from publicly available Punjabi songs collected from YouTube. An initial collection of 620 songs resulted in 465 successfully downloaded songs and 3,402 preliminary segments from 450 songs. After quality control and annotation, the final dataset contains 2,396 unique segments from 392 songs. Four native Punjabi annotators produced 2,870 annotation records, including a shared subset of 158 segments annotated by all four. Each annotation includes binary toxicity, eight fine-grained toxicity categories, severity, sentiment, mode, and an uncertainty flag. Inter-annotator agreement was measured with Fleiss' kappa on the shared subset, and majority-based resolution produced the final segment-level labels. Of the 2,396 segments, 705 (29.42%) were labelled toxic and 1,691 (70.58%) non-toxic. Violence was the most frequent category, occurring in 539 toxic segments (76.45%), followed by gang references (227, 32.20%) and drug references (133, 18.87%). The overall toxicity label achieved substantial agreement (kappa = 0.6521). PGT-FG provides a fine-grained resource for Punjabi toxicity detection and multimodal content analysis. The resolved dataset, with one final record per segment, is publicly available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23040156). Original lyrics, lyric excerpts, and copyrighted audio or video content are not redistributed.

#03Oct 23, 2026

cs.AI

Beyond Post-Hoc Rewards: Privileged Reasoning Exploration for Multimodal Embeddings

Tianyu Yang, Yijun Tian, Lars Benedikt Kaesberg and 4 more

Advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have driven substantial progress in multimodal embeddings. Recent methods exploit generative capabilities by augmenting embedded inputs with self-generated reasoning to produce more informative embeddings. However, conventional retrieval supervision for training embedding models specifies pairwise relevance relations without explicitly guiding the reasoning used for input augmentation. Such reasoning is neither directly observed nor uniquely determined by the input, allowing multiple plausible traces to introduce semantic cues of varying retrieval utility. Existing approaches largely optimize reasoning conditioned on the input alone, limiting the exploration of retrieval-relevant traces. We introduce PILOT, a framework that models reasoning as a latent variable and instantiates its prior and posterior distributions as distinct reasoning modes of a shared MLLM. The prior conditions only on the input, whereas the posterior uses additional training-time relational evidence to guide reasoning exploration. To translate the posterior's broader exploration into inference-time improvements, we derive an importance-weighted variational objective and instantiate it as a prior-posterior co-evolution framework that improves both modes under a shared inference-compatible reward while selectively transferring posterior trajectories to the prior according to their utility and prior reachability. On the 78-task MMEB-V2 benchmark, PILOT outperforms the primary baseline across all 12 task groups at both 2B and 7B parameters, improving overall scores by 3.2 and 3.3 points, respectively, with the largest gains in visual-document retrieval (+6.1 and +6.4 points). Our results show that relational supervision is most valuable not as a post-hoc reward but as a signal for shaping how reasoning is explored in training reasoning-enhanced embedding models.

#04Oct 23, 2026

cs.CR

Beyond Copying: Lifelong Smart Contract Security Task Construction via Protocol Mutation

Zifan Peng, Peng Huang, Jingyi Zheng and 5 more

AI agents can inspect code and run tests to support smart contract security. SlowMist reports about $38.6 billion in losses across the broader blockchain ecosystem. Existing evaluations can reward memorized or copied answers, including attack code recovered from public blockchain transactions. Reconstructing contracts and validating tasks also require costly manual effort. To address these issues, we propose CONSTRAINTDIAL, a framework for lifelong construction of smart contract security tasks via protocol mutation. It automates local contract reconstruction and uses attack execution to select changes to the required calls or inputs. Execution checks guide revisions that make the original attack fail while preserving exploitability, the security objective, and normal functionality. New incidents and audit findings enter the same procedure. With CONSTRAINTDIAL, we construct 3,045 task inputs from 203 public cases, covering detect, exploit, and patch. Compared with reconstruction alone, protocol mutation reduces success with supplied public answers by 10.9 percentage points on average across detect, exploit, and patch. The fraction of tasks solved by copying online answers falls by 9.3 points.

#05Oct 23, 2026

cs.AI

When Agents Fail: Model or Harness--Who's to Blame?

Shao Zhang, Hangfan Zhang, Yuanyuan Shi and 9 more

LLM agents combine models with execution harnesses, so agentic benchmark performance reflects their joint behavior. We argue that harnesses should therefore be evaluated through their interactions with underlying models. We develop a framework combining five complementary measures: (i) Valid Completion Rate (VCR), how reliably agents finish normally and deliver evaluable results, irrespective of task correctness; (ii) Model-Harness Fit, how well a harness supports task achievement through valid completion for a given model; (iii) Cross-Model Fit, a harness's overall suitability across evaluated models; (iv) Interaction Residuals, pairing-specific execution strengths and weaknesses hidden by component-level summaries; and (v) Token Load, the token demands of agent execution, including failed attempts. We evaluate four general-purpose harnesses (OpenCode, Codex CLI, Pi CLI, and DeepAgents) with four core models, plus two fixed native model-harness systems, on six benchmarks covering context management, tool use, long-context planning, multimodal interaction, and artifact handoff. Including native references and stress conditions, 111 evaluation settings yield 52,168 trajectories. Harness rankings vary across models and benchmarks; task performance and valid completion can favor different pairings, and similar task scores can accompany distinct execution profiles. OpenCode ranks first in cross-model performance, while DeepSeek V4 Flash Preview maintains consistently high Mean VCR across harnesses on the shared four-benchmark panel. These findings support evaluating model-harness interactions, training transferable harness-use capabilities in models, and harness designs adapted to the model and task.