ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Oct 23, 2026

cs.AI

Closing the Modality Gap via Simplex-Constrained Representations

Shubham Gupta, Siva Reddy, Perouz Taslakian and 2 more

While multimodal contrastive models like CLIP and CLAP successfully learn shared representations, their embeddings typically exhibit a persistent \emph{modality gap}. We propose addressing this separation through a purely geometric approach: changing the embedding domain from the unit sphere, $S^{d-1}$, to the probability simplex, $Δ^{d-1}$. Although both manifolds share the same intrinsic dimension, the simplex acts as a structural prior; its nonnegative, unit-mass constraints serve as a cross-modal calibration that forces both modalities to ground themselves in the same coordinate system. By attaching lightweight softmax adapters and using Total Variation similarity, we reduce the centroid $\ell_2$ gap by 97--99\% across five multimodal retrieval benchmarks. This confirms that simplicial geometry induces genuine semantic alignment, matching or exceeding the retrieval performance of standard unconstrained models.

#02Oct 23, 2026

cs.LG

RobustRLlib: A Unified Library and Benchmark for Robust Reinforcement Learning Algorithms

Xi Chen, Fengqi Hu, Zeyu Shen and 5 more

Robust reinforcement learning (RL) is critical for reliable real-world deployment, where policies may fail under diverse shifts and disruptions. Existing robust RL algorithms offer a rich set of mechanisms and principles, yet two major barriers limit their broader potential: limited algorithm reusability and an unclear empirical capability boundary. We introduce RobustRLlib, an algorithm-centric library and benchmark that addresses both challenges. It integrates 17 representative robust online, offline, and safe RL algorithms under a unified interface for substantially improved reusability, together with an enhanced evaluation platform spanning diverse real-world shifts and advanced humanoid and vision-language-action tasks. Systematic evaluation over 273 perturbation configurations provides an up-to-date capability map of current robust RL algorithms, revealing where they remain effective and where substantial robustness gaps persist. As an open-source, user-friendly platform, RobustRLlib offers a reproducible and extensible codebase for applying existing methods to new problems and developing new robust RL algorithms.

#03Oct 23, 2026

cs.RO

ViT-H: Generative Video-To-Humanoid Control with Motion Tracking Feedback

Zimo He, Tianyi Bian, Zizhong Yang and 7 more

Learning humanoid control from monocular human videos offers a scalable way to acquire diverse whole-body behaviors. Yet, existing reconstruction-retargeting-tracking pipelines are limited in system-level scalability by separately optimized intermediate stages and cannot directly optimize reference motion executability using downstream tracking feedback. We present ViT-H, a video-to-humanoid control framework following a generation-and-tracking paradigm. ViT-H directly generates humanoid reference motions from videos with a diffusion model, bypassing human motion reconstruction and retargeting, and uses motion-tracking outcomes to post-train the generator with direct preference optimization. We further introduce an autoregressive variant that enables real-time humanoid video teleoperation with sub-400 ms latency. Extensive experiments on the Unitree G1 demonstrate that ViT-H outperforms state-of-the-art reconstruction-retargeting-tracking pipelines in both motion quality and executability. We further show that ViT-H scales favorably with model size and with both pre-training and post-training data scale, while motion-tracking feedback consistently improves executability across different motion trackers.

#04Oct 23, 2026

econ.TH

Monetizing Intelligence: Advertising and Subscription Design on LLM Platforms

Yuhang Ji, Fasheng Xu, Tianjun Feng

Large language model (LLM) platforms introducing advertising must decide how much capability ad revenue should fund and what consumers should pay to avoid ads. We study a monopolistic platform that jointly chooses costly response quality, advertising intensity, and subscription prices when advertising reduces user value but better service raises advertising returns. Three findings follow. First, when partly ad-supported and ad-free plans coexist, advertising can finance useful service for consumers who receive none under pure subscription. Lower effective quality in middle plans weakens the alternatives available to premium users, allowing higher prices for unchanged ad-free service. Some fully ad-supported users gain utility, while partly ad-supported and ad-free users lose: broader access can coexist with utility polarization. Second, an intermediate advertising cap can maximize consumer surplus by preserving some revenue that finances service while limiting degradation. Third, cheaper compute can raise quality and reduce ad intensity, yet sufficiently large cost reductions can increase aggregate advertising revenue above its initial level because better service raises the value of the remaining advertised interactions. An extension shows how advertising-funded upgrades can bring plans to the same maximum capability and advertising exposure, eliminating the basis for different prices. These results make menu design central to evaluating LLM advertising: the consequences extend beyond users who see ads to the alternatives and prices faced by those who do not.

#05Oct 23, 2026

cs.LG

Where Rounding Happens Matters: Rounding-Location Alignment Stabilizes LLM Reinforcement Learning

Yijing Ke, Tianle Cai, Ruosong Wang

Reinforcement learning for large language models often uses separate systems for inference and training. Even with identical weights and BF16 tensors, implementation differences can make an intended on-policy update off-policy and destabilize training. Existing remedies align the entire inference and training stacks, change global precision, or modify the learning algorithm. We ask whether aligning selected parts of the execution stack can stabilize BF16 RL while other implementation differences remain. We align training-side rounding locations with inference in three regions---RoPE, SwiGLU, and residual RMSNorm---by retaining selected intermediates in FP32 until their BF16 outputs. Across four Qwen-family models, aligning all three regions prevents the collapse observed under the default BF16 baseline; RoPE-path alignment alone also suffices in the studied runs, despite remaining numerical discrepancies. The interventions keep the inference engine, matrix-multiplication and attention kernels, and learning objective unchanged.