ML Reads

Personal arXiv list

ML papers to read today.

Pick a topic and keep a small daily list of papers worth opening.

Refresh queueDaily mix

Today's queue

5 papers

#01Oct 26, 2026

cs.LG

Work Agents: Systems, Capabilities, and Optimization

Zishan Xu, Enjun Du, Mingqi Gao and 13 more

As foundation models evolve from information generation to digital work execution, agents are increasingly capable of completing complex tasks across tools, applications, and workflows. However, existing research lacks a unified perspective on how agents reliably accomplish delegated work. To address this gap, we present a work-centric, system-level perspective that views work agents as systems combining foundation models and runtime harnesses to execute tasks in stateful workspaces and deliver verifiable outcomes. We introduce two complementary dimensions, work persistence and work openness, to characterize working conditions, and classify digital work into five forms according to task scope and organization. Building on this framework, we identify five core capability families required for reliable work execution and examine approaches to model optimization, harness optimization, and their joint optimization. We further analyze existing evaluation methods and metrics from the perspective of work outcomes. Finally, we discuss future research directions, including sustained work delegation, adaptation to open environments, and the interaction between work execution and capability improvement. This paper provides a unified framework for understanding, optimizing, and evaluating work agents, supporting the development of systems capable of delivering reliable, verifiable, and practically valuable work outcomes.

#02Oct 26, 2026

cs.LG

TRACE: Memory-Efficient Time Series Class-Incremental Learning via Temporal-Spectral Reconstruction

Junhui Mao, Junru Zhang, Liming Ye and 7 more

Web-connected sensing applications continuously generate multivariate time series with evolving behavioral categories, making Time Series Class-Incremental Learning (TSCIL) essential for adapting to new classes without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. However, preserving diverse and evolving class distributions under strict privacy and memory constraints remains a fundamental challenge. Existing approaches often face a trade-off between retaining sufficient historical knowledge for accurate recognition and minimizing the memory required for continual adaptation. To address these limitations, we propose TRACE, a memory-efficient, replay-free framework that preserves class-specific knowledge through generative modeling rather than sample rehearsal. TRACE employs a compact, frozen temporal-spectral representation and lightweight class-specific autoencoders to capture complex intra-class variations. By independently preserving each class model, TRACE avoids recursive generation and catastrophic forgetting, while enabling direct classification through reconstruction-based scoring without retaining historical samples or large statistical matrices. Extensive experiments across five TSCIL benchmarks demonstrate that TRACE achieves competitive classification accuracy while reducing mean retained memory by approximately 98.26% compared with TS-ACL, the strongest evaluated analytical baseline, and achieving an approximately 33.43% relative improvement in accuracy on GrabMyo.

#03Oct 26, 2026

cs.LG

Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Using Routed Ensembles and Trajectory Attribution

Zhenshuo Zhang, Ruoxuan Xiong, Hongyang R. Zhang

Multi-objective reinforcement learning is a fundamental problem for modern AI, with applications spanning post-training, reasoning models, and robotic control. A central challenge is to learn policies that balance competing objectives, such as helpfulness versus honesty in safety and alignment, or speed versus energy in robotics. The optimal policy can vary sharply with objective-weighting combinations, and the extent of this variation depends crucially on the degree of conflict among objectives, making per-preference policy learning sample-inefficient. In this paper, we introduce objective-conflict coefficients and derive near-optimal regret bounds for online settings using this measure, thereby quantifying the impact of misalignment on learning efficiency. Then, we design routed ensemble policy learning, an algorithm that maintains a small set of basis policies and dynamically routes trajectories to the policy with the highest potential reward. Finally, we consider trajectory selection as another approach to mitigate objective conflict, and design a kernel surrogate trajectory attribution algorithm that estimates how feedback signals from a set of trajectories influence policy learning on other trajectories. The kernel can capture nonlinear interactions such as synergy and antagonism between trajectories. We evaluate our approach across diverse environments and benchmarks: routed ensembles improve average performance by 4.3% over baselines for online environments from Meta-World and MO-Gymnasium, and kernel surrogate attribution improves correlation with leave-one-out analysis over existing baselines by 50%. When applied to trajectory selection, kernel-based attribution yields a 27% improvement in reward over baseline attribution methods.

#04Oct 26, 2026

cs.LG

Selective Tie Learning: Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Preference Optimization

Christian Moya, Purav Matlia, Elliott Thornley and 1 more

Preference optimization can learn spurious correlations, and augmenting the preference data with ties (equally preferred responses) can reduce spurious reliance. However, ties differ in their corrective effect, making their selection for augmentation important. For log-linear policies, we derive each tie's influence on spurious reliance and show that taking the largest predicted reductions is first-order optimal among subsets of equal size. Computing these influences requires knowledge of the spurious features and the curvature of the training objective, which is often unavailable or expensive to estimate. To this end, we explore using the magnitude of a tie's implicit reward margin and characterize the conditions under which it is a useful proxy for predicted influence. To test the theory and its qualitative transfer to neural models, we estimate influence with a counterfactual proxy for spurious reliance and use a generalized Gauss--Newton approximation to curvature for language models. Across log-linear policies, neural models, and large language models, our selection rules consistently achieve comparable reductions in spurious reliance with fewer ties than uniform selection.

#05Oct 26, 2026

cs.LG

FOCUS: Active Critic Learning for Long-Horizon Language Model Agents

Zhengping Jiang, William Jurayj, Liaoyaqi Wang and 3 more

Sparse outcome rewards make it difficult for long-horizon language-model agents to assign credit to earlier actions. Learned critics provide value estimates for intermediate states, but these estimates can be inaccurate, while estimating intermediate values with repetitive continuation samples from points within a trajectory incurs substantial costs. To mitigate these issues, we introduce FOCUS, an RL method that uses selective branching to help the critic network learn its value estimator. The rollout controller facilitates active learning for the critic by sampling continuations from states that are expected to most reduce the critic's estimation error. These refined value estimates then score the segment between consecutive states with a TD($λ$) advantage, while the sampled evidence supplies training targets for the critic. FOCUS supports long-horizon agentic reinforcement learning through a modular context-management interface that decouples context management from rollout allocation. Our experiments show that using compaction-induced segment boundaries for value estimation and credit assignment, FOCUS outperforms GRPO and VinePPO with matched per-step generation budgets on legal reasoning, deep search, and code localization benchmarks, improving held-out accuracy at Qwen3.5-9B scale by 7.2 points over the strongest baseline on BrowseComp-Plus (55.4 vs. 48.2) and by 4.1 points on DeonticBench (56.5 vs. 52.4).