#01Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
K2V: Generative Keyframing For Physically Plausible Video Generation
Felix O'Mahony, Daniel Olmeda Reino, Roberto Cipolla and 1 more
Video diffusion models are able to generate samples with high-quality appearance and textural qualities. However, content produced by these methods is known to exhibit significant physical errors. This is because, in a classical video generation setting, all physical reasoning must take place simultaneously and exclusively within the diffusion process.We propose to resolve these issues by redistributing the task of physical reasoning onto a language model-backed keyframe generation module, which allows for explicit reasoning in language, and fine-grained control over the appearance of the video at important moments in the video. We then condition a video generation model with these keyframes, reducing the role of the diffusion model to the simpler task of interpolating between physically-correct intermediate states, rather than inferring an entire sequence with diffusion. Results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the Physics-IQ Verified benchmark and PhyGenBench.
#02Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
Ropedia Xperience 2: A Gold Standard for Scaling Physical AI Environments and Behaviors
Hao Li, Fangzhou Hong, Zhaoxi Chen and 18 more
Large foundation models such as GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 have recently been shown to control robots directly from visual observations. They nevertheless remain brittle on long-horizon, contact-rich tasks in real-world environments. Further progress depends on two complementary resources: demonstrations of human behavior that supervise how tasks are performed, and interactive environments in which policies can be rolled out, evaluated, and improved in closed loop. Language models have advanced along well-characterized scaling laws; the corresponding question for physical AI is how capability scales with environments and behaviors, which first requires identifying which data to scale and how to produce and reuse such data continuously. To address this question, we introduce Ropedia Xperience 2, comprising 1,589 released metric-scale 3D scans and a collection of 4,230 egocentric recordings of 74 tasks (131 hours). We further show that each capture can be repurposed for robot learning: scenes are converted into physically interactive simulation environments, human motion is retargeted to whole-body robot trajectories, and additional robot behaviors are obtained through virtual teleoperation and automated long-horizon trajectory generation. We propose this joint capture of environments and behaviors as a gold standard for physical AI data collection, laying a data foundation for establishing scaling laws over environments and behaviors.
#03Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
SpotDiff: A Plug-and-Play Framework for Zero-Shot Change Detection in Remote Sensing Imagery
Anit Upadhyaya, Ata Akbari Asanjan, Chaitanya Jalluri and 2 more
Remote sensing change detection usually relies on large collections of temporally aligned, pixel-level annotations, which limits its scalability across regions, imaging platforms and application domains. Recent zero-shot approaches reduce the need for supervision, but they often localize fine-grained changes poorly because their features are coarse or inconsistent across time. We present SpotDiff, a training-free, plug-and-play framework for zero-shot change detection built by composing complementary vision foundation models. SpotDiff uses DINOv3 for semantically robust features, AnyUp to reconstruct them at pixel resolution, and SAM 3 for text-guided region-of-interest proposals, which an inference-time multi-scale strategy (SWIMS) makes reliable on small objects. Change is then measured by comparing the reconstructed features of the two dates inside the proposed regions, with no learnable components, fine-tuning or change labels. To our knowledge, SpotDiff is the first change detection method to use a universal feature upsampler, which alone adds 13.8 F1 over bilinear upsampling of the same features. On LEVIR-CD, SpotDiff reaches 82.46 F1, 2.06 points above the strongest prior training-free method, and on the multi-class SECOND benchmark it improves building change detection by 10.3 IoU and the six-class average by 2.2 IoU. Qualitative results on PlanetScope (3 m) and Sentinel-2 (10 m) imagery show that the same pipeline transfers across resolutions without modification. Our results indicate that composing modern foundation models is an effective route to scalable, label-free change detection.
#04Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
FLEX-LBP: Learning Local Binary Patterns with Exact Binary Inference for Texture Classification
Mohamed Alimoussa, Amal El Kaid
Local Binary Patterns (LBP) remain among the most widely used texture descriptors, from industrial inspection to medical imaging. Yet their radius, sampling angles, color transform and thresholds are fixed by hand for each dataset. We present FLEX-LBP, which learns these parameters by backpropagation while every forward pass computes exact binary codes and hard histogram counts. A straight-through estimator acts only in the backward pass, so the deployed descriptor is an interpretable hard-binary LBP with 90 learnable parameters and unchanged inference cost. In a controlled ablation on six color texture benchmarks, the component worth learning is dataset-dependent. One configuration, applied unchanged everywhere, learns the geometry and thresholds with the color transform frozen. It improves the nearest-neighbor accuracy of the identical fixed descriptor by 3.55 points on average over five seeds, significantly on five of six benchmarks and never significantly worse. With a linear discriminant readout, it gains 0.9 points; the fully learned descriptor gains 2.7 and has the highest mean. FLEX-LBP is more accurate than five classical LBP-family descriptors, PCANet and a neural LBP on five of six benchmarks. Its mean nearest-neighbor accuracy exceeds that of frozen ImageNet ResNet-50 features (23.5 million parameters). On the Kather colorectal cancer histology benchmark, the fully learned descriptor reaches 93.8%, significantly above the best classical descriptor (Completed LBP, 92.8%). The learned radii adapt in directions that recur across seeds. Noise drowns single-pixel comparisons and illuminant change flips inter-channel ones; median sampling or gray-world normalization restores 96-97%. The code is available as a drop-in PyTorch layer at https://github.com/medalimoussa/FLEX-LBP.
#05Nov 12, 2026
cs.CV
Automated PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Scoring with Uncertainty-Guided Triage in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Kesi Xu, Ayesha Azam, Tanvier Kaur and 7 more
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) informs immunotherapy selection in non-small cell lung cancer. Near the 1% and 50% cutoffs, the score should also indicate when closer review is warranted. We designed a three-stage framework to follow the sequence of TPS assessment. Stage 1 identifies tumor regions and excludes macrophage-rich patches. Stage 2, a dual-branch cell counting network (D2Count-Net), counts PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumor cells in these regions to calculate TPS. Stage 3, TPS-Guard, an uncertainty-guided triage mechanism, reports model uncertainty as the disagreement among independently trained models, refers the most uncertain slides, and flags scores near the 1% or 50% cutoff when model estimates disagree across that cutoff. Flags state the reason for referral or alert the pathologist to possible scoring errors on auto-reported slides. In a retrospective, single-center study, 154 whole-slide images were scored by three pathologists, and the model and each pathologist were compared in turn with the mean of the other two. On the 114 slides unseen in training, model mean absolute error (MAE) was 6.96 percentage points, within the range of the three pathologists (4.24 to 8.29), and model uncertainty correlated with absolute TPS error (Spearman rho = 0.77) and inter-pathologist disagreement (rho = 0.71). After referral of the 15% most uncertain slides, model and pathologist MAE both decreased. Applied without retraining to an external, publicly available dataset, TPS-Guard still directed review to higher-error cases, and referring more uncertain cases raised sensitivity at the 50% cutoff. TPS-Guard provides reasons for reviewing individual automated scores and identifies slides that also produce greater disagreement among pathologists. Prospective reader studies should assess TPS-Guard's effect on TPS reporting.