#01Aug 7, 2026
cs.LG
Omni-modal decomposition autoencoders learn full-stack wearable disentangled representations
Ioannis Ziogas, Ensieh Khazaei, Bilal Taha and 4 more
Learning disentangled representations is a key requirement for developing versatile, general-purpose, and sustainable models in multi-modal wearable computing. However, existing approaches do not operate as full-stack wearable processors, i.e., they do not simultaneously address task-specific classification performance, disentangled and interpretable representation learning, fusion, and generative modeling of highly heterogeneous multi-modal time series. To address this gap, we introduce Omni-modal Variational Decomposition Autoencoders (OmniDecVAEs), a framework that efficiently learns multi-purpose representations in a unified and scalable manner from arbitrarily many modalities. OmniDecVAEs extend DecVAEs by learning modality-conditioned time-frequency latent subspaces through a multi-view self-supervised decomposition loss and a shared asymmetric autoencoder (AE) architecture. Results on a challenging omni-modal human activity recognition (HAR) setting with up to thirty modalities, demonstrate the ability of OmniDecVAEs to learn full-stack wearable representations. When compared to transformer-based and VAE-based methods, OmniDecVAEs full-stack disentangled representation properties lead to accuracy improvements of 1.01% and 6.75% in activity and identity recognition, respectively. Furthermore, OmniDecVAEs synthesize realistic omni-modal time-frequency data that manifest with enhanced reconstructions (mean absolute error improves by 76.84%) and distributional similarity between real and synthetic data (maximum mean discrepancy improves by 13.85%). Our results highlight OmniDecVAEs potential as a lightweight model suitable for intelligent edge wearables and clinical healthcare, unifying processing requirements and abilities in a single model, through its enhanced representational capacity, modality-invariant spatial complexity (4.1M parameters), and real-time latency.
#02Aug 7, 2026
cs.SE
Taxonomy-Driven Analysis of Open-Source AI Risk Mitigation Tools
Afreen Alam, Evgenija Popchanovska, Ana Gjorgjevikj and 4 more
Rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in enterprise settings has introduced operational, security, and governance risks. As generative AI applications move from pilot to production, manual harm identification and mitigation are becoming difficult to scale. Although many tools support model evaluation, adversarial testing, runtime guardrails, and observability, the tooling landscape remains fragmented. Tools are typically designed for specific engineering tasks and described in technical terms that do not align with governance frameworks or risk taxonomies, making it difficult to determine which tools address which risks and where critical gaps remain. This paper proposes a structured protocol to automate AI risk mitigation through a taxonomy-driven analysis of open-source LLM evaluation and security tools. We map the capabilities of 21 prominent open-source tools to the 32 subcategories of the extended MIT AI Risk Mitigation and Response Taxonomy. An LLM-assisted retrieval-augmented generation pipeline analyzes source code and documentation to extract capabilities for each taxonomy category. Reliability assessment yielded moderate agreement (Fleiss' Kappa = 0.509) among three independent reviewers. The analysis reveals a highly skewed landscape in which tools cluster around technical and operational controls, while governance, legal and regulatory, and financial and market controls remain largely unaddressed. This motivates a layered risk-mitigation architecture combining tool-based controls with organizational and regulatory processes. The mapping protocol achieved an F1 score of 75.5% after majority voting. Overall, the study provides a practical mapping between enterprise AI risk categories and open-source mitigation capabilities, identifies where human oversight remains necessary, and presents a taxonomy-driven framework applicable to open-source and proprietary solutions.
#03Aug 7, 2026
cs.AI
A Picture is Worth a Thousand Tokens: How Vision Language Models Cut AI Energy Costs While Improving Accuracy
Bhavika Jalli, Nikhil Korati Prasanna, Jayanta Choudhury
LLM inference accounts for over 90% of AI operational energy, scaling directly with input token count---a critical inefficiency for telecom network analytics and numerical time-series data analysis (NTSDA), where raw multivariate KPI windows from 4G/5G cell sites expand into thousands of floating-point tokens. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) eliminate this mismatch by encoding time-series as 2D plots, achieving 3.6-10.4x input token reduction across Llama-3.2-90B, Qwen2.5-VL-72B, and Pixtral-12B architectures. This translates to 1.8-2.5x measured inference energy reduction, saving approximately 7.2 MJ/day at telecom edge deployments and CloudRAN that monitor 200 cells per 15-minute interval. Critically, efficiency gains do not sacrifice accuracy: a fine-tuned Llama-3.2-90B-Vision VLM achieves 220.7% higher precision than its text-only counterpart and outperforms LSTM and ARIMA baselines by over 144% on telecom anomaly detection. On public benchmarks, Pixtral-12B achieves a 20.6x improvement in J/F1 score at mean F1 = 0.82. At 24 KPIs, text representations exceed the 128K context window of most production LLMs, rendering text-only processing infeasible without truncation, while visual representations remain within standard limits. These results establish VLMs as an energy-efficient and accuracy-superior modality for numerical time-series workloads, providing empirical grounding for AI inference systems that treat energy consumption as a first-class engineering constraint.
#04Aug 7, 2026
cs.CL
LitTraceQA: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Grounding and Verification in Scientific Question Answering
Xuye Liu, Yimu Wang, Peng Shi and 7 more
Scientific literature is increasingly used as a knowledge source for language models, retrieval-augmented generation systems, and research assistants, but answering research questions from papers requires more than fluent generation. A reliable system must identify the relevant papers, locate the concrete evidence that supports the answer, and produce a response that is faithful to that evidence. We present LitTraceQA, a benchmark for literature-grounded question answering over scientific papers. Given a research question and a metadata pool of papers, a system must return three connected outputs: canonical paper identifiers, supporting evidence locations, and answers in one or more requested formats, including free-form text, multiple-choice answers, and structured tables. LitTraceQA targets evidence types common in scientific reading: tables, figures, text spans, equations or algorithms, and citation contexts. The public development split contains 55 examples, including 26 hidden-source single-paper questions and 29 multi-paper questions, and provides gold papers, evidence annotations, and answers for local validation. We also analyze a larger final annotation collection with 4,978 unique-question records over 4,859 unique gold papers. By evaluating paper retrieval, evidence grounding, and answer accuracy separately, LitTraceQA provides a testbed for scientific QA systems that produce verifiable answers rather than unsupported summaries.
#05Aug 7, 2026
physics.med-ph
Measurements Automatically Extracted from Zero Echo Time MRI Using Deep Learning Image Segmentation and Geometric Modeling Agree with Expert Manual Readings
Jack Consolini, Eric A. Bogner, Meghan Sahr and 3 more
Computed tomography (CT) remains the reference for 3D osseous morphometry in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) but requires ionizing radiation and manual measurement. Zero echo time (ZTE) MRI visualizes cortical bone and yields FAI angles that agree with CT, but automated angle extraction remains limited. We developed and validated automated FAI angle computation from ZTE MRI and assessed agreement with expert manual measurements in a cross-sectional study (level of evidence, 3). Pelvic ZTE MRI was acquired in 73 participants (mean age 36.8 +/- 18.5 years; 51 women, 22 men), yielding 135 hips. nnU-Net was trained on 100 manually curated hips to segment the femur, pelvis, and three osseous landmarks. Custom geometric algorithms computed alpha, femoral neck-shaft, Tonnis, coronal and sagittal center-edge, and acetabular version angles from inferred segmentations. Measurements on 35 test hips were compared with the mean of two radiologists' manual measures using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Dice exceeded 0.96 for bone and ranged from 0.65 to 0.83 for landmarks. Median landmark error was 0.38 mm (femoral head), 0.82 mm (lateral acetabulum), and <2.5 mm (medial acetabulum, greater trochanter). Interrater ICC was excellent for acetabular version, coronal center-edge, and Tonnis (>=0.82) but poor for alpha and femoral neck-shaft. Model versus rater-mean agreement was excellent for acetabular version, coronal center-edge, and Tonnis (0.92-0.96), good for mid-acetabular sagittal center-edge (0.74), and fair for alpha (0.45) and femoral neck-shaft (0.55). Model Bland-Altman limits of agreement were narrower than interrater limits for most angles. Fully automated morphometric assessment from ZTE MRI is feasible and performs comparably to expert readers for most coverage and version angles.